Auriculotemporal Nerve Block in TMJ Disorders
The Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Auriculotemporal Nerve Block In Temporomandibular Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Auriculotemporal Nerve Block (ATNB) in achieving unrestricted mouth opening amount and in reducing the pain scores in those patients diagnosed with disc displacement with (DDWR) and without reduction (DDWOR) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, who could not benefit from noninvasive methods but did not want further invasion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2021
CompletedApril 1, 2021
March 1, 2021
8 months
March 27, 2021
March 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Baseline Pain Intensity
Pain intensity was measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), in which 0 referred to 'no pain', 5 referred to 'moderate pain,' and 10 referred to 'excruciating pain'. The patients were asked to mark their pain intensities on VAS scale.
At the initial visit before starting anesthetic administration.
Post-injection Pain Intensity
Pain intensity was measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), in which 0 referred to 'no pain', 5 referred to 'moderate pain,' and 10 referred to 'excruciating pain'. The patients were asked to mark their pain intensities on VAS scale.
At six months follow-up visit
Change From Baseline Maximal Mouth Opening on Post-Injection Follow Up Visits
All patients' maximal mouth opening were measured and recorded as the distance between upper and lower right central incisors.
At the first week, fourth week and sixth month.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Overall Satisfaction With The Applied Treatment
At the six-month follow-up visit
Study Arms (1)
Auriculotemporal Nerve Block Administration
EXPERIMENTALA total of 3 doses of Auriculotemporal Nerve Block (ATNB) were administered to involved participants. Local anesthetic solutions containing Articaine Hydrochloride (80 mg / 2 ml) and epinephrine bitartrate (0.02 mg / 2 ml) were used for ATNB application. The injections were repeated on follow-up visits in the first and fourth weeks. The maximal mouth opening amounts, pain intensity values (via VAS scale), and self-reported outcomes were evaluated at the pre-injection, first week, fourth week, and sixth-month follow-up controls.
Interventions
The head and neck of the condyle were detected by palpating the pretragal area. Then, the needle was inserted anterior to the junction of the tragus and the lobule. After 0.5 ml the solution was subcutaneously infiltrated, the needle was protruded until it touched the neck of the condyle. Aspiration was performed to avoid intravenous injections, and the remaining solution was injected thereafter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Underwent non-invasive therapies (occlusal stabilization splints, behavioral modifications, physical therapy, pharmacotherapy) but did not benefit from them and volunteered for the ATNB instead of invasive therapies (arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, and discectomy).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with
- Symptoms of the diseases possibly related to TMD (e.g., fibromyalgia, hypothyroidism, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis)
- Orofacial disorders that might have been responsible for the TMD symptoms (e.g., neuralgia, migraine, myositis, trauma, neuropathic pain, infections)
- Complications due to ATNB (e.g., temporary facial nerve palsy, hematoma, positive aspiration)
- History of invasive therapies or TMJ surgeries
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Dentistry
Tokat Province, 60100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
NASCIMENTO, Mirella Marques Mercês do, et al. Anesthetic blockage of the auriculotemporal nerve and its clinical implications. Odontologia Clínico-Científica (Online), 2011, 10.2: 143-146.
BACKGROUNDAyesh EE, Ernberg M, Svensson P. Effects of local anesthetics on somatosensory function in the temporomandibular joint area. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):715-25. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0893-4. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
PMID: 17588187BACKGROUNDNascimento MM, Vasconcelos BC, Porto GG, Ferdinanda G, Nogueira CM, Raimundo RD. Physical therapy and anesthetic blockage for treating temporomandibular disorders: a clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18(1):e81-5. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17491.
PMID: 23229236RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mehmet K. Tümer, AssocProfDr
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2021
First Posted
April 1, 2021
Study Start
January 15, 2020
Primary Completion
September 23, 2020
Study Completion
December 7, 2020
Last Updated
April 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data regarding participants were made available in the manuscript