Comparative Evaluation of Pulpal Anaesthetic Efficacy of Different Anaesthetic Solutions for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Pulpal and periapical inflammation and infection can cause tissue pH in the affected region to be lowered which results in less penetration of anesthetic solution in the nerve membrane and hence delays the onset of anesthesia. So, the purpose of this study was to compare the pulpal anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine, articaine, mepivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with irreversible pulpitis (IP). One hundred and twenty adult patients with IP concerning mandibular molars randomly received IANB with either of the three solutions: 2% lidocaine with epinephrine; 4% articaine with epinephrine; 3% plain mepivacaine. Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Endodontic treatment was initiated. Success was defined as no or mild pain (pain score≤54mm on Hp VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with the chi-square test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2022
CompletedFebruary 14, 2022
February 1, 2022
12 months
January 24, 2022
February 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anesthetic Success
Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Success was defined as no or mild pain (pain score≤54mm on Hp VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation.
15 minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve block
Study Arms (3)
Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine with epinephrine
EXPERIMENTALAn inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 4% articaine with epinephrine
Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 3% plain mepivacaine
EXPERIMENTALAn inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 3% plain mepivacaine
Interventions
Inferior alveolar nerve block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- active pain in a mandibular molar
- prolonged response to cold testing with an ice stick and an electric pulp tester
- absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiographs, except for a widened periodontal ligament
- vital coronal pulp on access opening and ability to understand the use of pain scales
You may not qualify if:
- known allergy, sensitivity, or contraindications to any opioid or nonopioid analgesic including aspirin or NSAIDs
- history of active peptic ulcer within the preceding 12 months
- history of bleeding problems or anticoagulant use within the last month
- patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding
- a history of known or suspected drug abuse
- patients who had taken NSAIDs within 12 h before administration of the study drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dr. Vivek Aggarwallead
- SGT DENTAL COLLEGEcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2022
First Posted
February 14, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 28, 2017
Study Completion
February 28, 2017
Last Updated
February 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share