Personalized Disease Prevention
PDP
2 other identifiers
interventional
721
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate whether patients and their providers benefit from an evidence-based decision tool to help prioritize preventive (and select chronic disease management) services based on their potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy, individualized for patient risk factors. The study seeks to enroll 600 patients and 60 primary care providers. Half of providers will be assigned to an intervention to utilize the decision tool with approximately 10 high-priority patients each (patients of particular interest to the research study, on whom follow-up outcomes will be collected), and half will be assigned to usual care. Surveys will be administered at baseline and approximately 6 months later; electronic health records data on preventive service utilization will be collected; and optional qualitative interviews may be conducted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedMarch 2, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.5 years
June 20, 2022
February 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in quality-adjusted life expectancy
Change in quality-adjusted life expectancy for high-priority patients in the intervention arm, as compared with the control arm.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Change in quality-adjusted life expectancy
12 months
Change in quality-adjusted life expectancy
Through study completion, approximately 2 to 3 years on average
Change in life expectancy
6 months
Change in life expectancy
12 months
Change in life expectancy
Through study completion, approximately 2 to 3 years on average
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Patient health
Within 3 business days of baseline encounter
Not ready to change (top-ranked)
Within 3 business days of baseline encounter
Not ready to change (bottom-ranked)
Within 3 business days of baseline encounter
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONControl arm: Participants will not receive individualized preventive care recommendations (decision tool).
Individualized preventive care recommendations (decision tool)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention arm: Providers will receive individualized preventive care recommendations (decision tool) for eligible patients, and discuss them with patients using shared decision-making.
Interventions
Providers will receive individualized preventive care recommendations (decision tool) for eligible patients, and discuss them with patients using shared decision-making
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A provider assigned to the intervention arm of the RCT is the patient's primary care physician (PCP) of record in the EHR.
- Aged 40-75 years.
- A modifiable lifestyle factor with a large impact on quality-adjusted life expectancy, assessed by ≥1 of the following:
- current smoker
- BMI ≥30.0 kg/m\^2
- BP ≥140/90 mmHg
- year ASCVD risk ≥10%
- HbA1c ≥9%
- alcohol/week \>4.2 oz (98 g) for female or \>8.4 oz (196 g) for male
- Eligible for a high number of preventive services, assessed by ≥3 of the following. Factor(s) used to satisfy criteria 1 also count toward satisfying criteria 2:
- current smoker
- BMI ≥27.0 kg/m\^2
- systolic BP \>130 mmHg
- year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%
- HbA1c ≥7.5%
- +11 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer in the past 3 years (other than non-melanoma skin)
- Diagnosis of alcohol abuse in past 3 years
- History of myocardial infarction
- History of stroke
- End-stage renal disease
- Moderate-severe congestive heart failure (moderate-severe may be ignored if needed to facilitate automatic data extraction)
- Moderate-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (moderate-severe may be ignored if needed to facilitate automatic data extraction)
- Other comorbidity with limited life expectancy, in the opinion of ≥2 members of the study team.
- Inability to communicate or limited communication (speaking, reading, writing) in the English language.
- Known current pregnancy.
- Known acute care need that is likely to limit time available for discussion of preventive care.
- The first primary care encounter since a hospitalization, surgery or emergency department utilization.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Glen Takslerlead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (11)
Taksler GB, Hu B, DeGrandis F Jr, Montori VM, Fagerlin A, Nagykaldi Z, Rothberg MB. Effect of Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations vs Usual Care on Patient Interest and Use of Recommendations: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31455.
PMID: 34726747BACKGROUNDZhang JJ, Rothberg MB, Misra-Hebert AD, Gupta NM, Taksler GB. Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011677. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11677.
PMID: 32716515BACKGROUNDTaksler GB, Beth Mercer M, Fagerlin A, Rothberg MB. Assessing Patient Interest in Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations. MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850803. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850803. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
PMID: 31192307BACKGROUNDTaksler GB, Keshner M, Fagerlin A, Hajizadeh N, Braithwaite RS. Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):161-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00005.
PMID: 23922061BACKGROUNDOwens DK, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Prioritizing guideline-recommended interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):223-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00014. No abstract available.
PMID: 23922066BACKGROUNDBorsky A, Zhan C, Miller T, Ngo-Metzger Q, Bierman AS, Meyers D. Few Americans Receive All High-Priority, Appropriate Clinical Preventive Services. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):925-928. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1248.
PMID: 29863918BACKGROUNDMuntner P, Hardy ST, Fine LJ, Jaeger BC, Wozniak G, Levitan EB, Colantonio LD. Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545.
PMID: 32902588BACKGROUNDKrist AH, Glenn BA, Glasgow RE, Balasubramanian BA, Chambers DA, Fernandez ME, Heurtin-Roberts S, Kessler R, Ory MG, Phillips SM, Ritzwoller DP, Roby DH, Rodriguez HP, Sabo RT, Sheinfeld Gorin SN, Stange KC; MOHR Study Group. Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project. Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 25;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-73.
PMID: 23799943BACKGROUNDKriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
PMID: 19879711BACKGROUNDGBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
PMID: 33069327BACKGROUNDTaksler GB, Le P, Hu B, Alberts J, Flynn AJ, Rothberg MB. Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06750-7.
PMID: 36273151DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glen Taksler, PhD
The Cleveland Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- With the exception of the study biostatistician(s) and a safety assessor(s), all Co-Investigators participating in the randomized trial will be blinded to outcomes and safety events by study arm. The nature of the randomized trial requires interaction with participants throughout the study (e.g., ongoing feedback from intervention arm providers, qualitative interviews with patients and providers), the assignment of participants to the intervention vs. control arm will be unblinded for the entire study team. Only the stratification of outcomes and safety events by study arm will be blinded.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2022
First Posted
July 19, 2022
Study Start
August 5, 2022
Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data expected to be available by the online publication date of manuscript(s) resulting from this study, or the date of institutional approval to share data, whichever is later. Data expected to remain available for at least 6 years after study conclusion.
- Access Criteria
- Data must be used for academic research purposes. Use for commercial purposes and by individuals employed by for-profit institutions excluded. Only qualified users may access the data. Users must accept a legal disclaimer, make no attempt to reveal personal or private information, and have institutional review board approval or a determination that such approval is not required. Other access criteria in accordance with NIH policy, institutional review board requirements and applicable laws (e.g., HIPAA) and regulations may be required.
De-identified individual participant data, subject to compliance with institutional policies (for example, approval from Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board). Specific variables may be excluded based on organizational policies, local institutional review board rules, and local, state and federal laws and regulations, including the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Examples include any data that the study team is legally prohibited from sharing, data for which subjects do not provide consent or data which could result in identification of subjects. Should this trial result in an invention or intended patent, some aspects of data sharing may be delayed or withheld as appropriate; for example, to allow time to complete necessary filings and/or execute the invention or patent.