NCT05455255

Brief Summary

Teaching the nursing process that nursing students will use throughout their professional career is very important. In this direction, considering the Z generation, innovative and technology-based teaching methods should be used. Since the subject of the nursing process is the building block of nursing, its teaching should also be effective. The use of innovative and technology-based education methods that will increase the active participation of the students in the teaching of the nursing process, reinforce the learning, and encourage them to use problem-solving and critical thinking skills has been very important in recent years. For this reason, this research was planned to examine the effect of flipped learning(FL) on students' problem solving and critical thinking skills and their views on this model in nursing process teaching. In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method. In the quantitative part of the research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be used.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2020

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2022

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 13, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 7, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Flipped ModelNursing ProcessProblem solvingCritical thinking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)

    In this study, the "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)" developed by Semerci (2016) was used. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the CTTS scale was determined as 0.96. This scale consists of 49 items scaled as "I totally disagree (1)", I mostly disagree (2), I partially agree (3), I mostly agree (4), I totally agree (5)". The CTTS total score ranges from 49 to 245. It was stated that the students who scored high on the scale had a high tendency to think critically. (Semerci 2016).

    5 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Problem Solving Inventory (PSI)

    5 weeks

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Focus group semi-structured interview form -qualitative part

    immediately after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

FL will be applied to the intervention group. In this model, short videos of the course will be delivered to students via WhatsApp one week in advance. At the beginning of the lesson, students' deficiencies will be corrected by making kahoot. Afterwards, group work, case scenario, role-play scenario and conceptual map methods will be applied in the course.

Other: Experimental

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

The subject of the nursing process will be transferred to the control group with powerpoint presentations by the educator. The activities in the other group will be presented by the trainer as an example.

Interventions

FL was applied by Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams in 2007 for high school students who had to be absent from chemistry class. Bergmann and Sams published all the learning activities they used during the lesson as videos. Bergmann and Sams (2012) stated that in this model, which they developed over time, it is not compulsory for the trainer to explain the entire course content in the videos, and the important thing is to allocate time to active learning methods during the course. In the FL model, the summary of the course content is presented to the individuals outside the classroom with tools such as video and power point presentations. In the lesson, activities are carried out for the active participation of the student. The student performs the course content outside of the classroom, and the homework and learning the course in the classroom.

Experimental Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 24 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsThe genders were equalized in the experimental and control groups.
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Not having seen the subject of the nursing process before
  • Adequate internet access
  • Being willing to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not willing to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nasibe Yağmur Ziyai

Sakarya, Serdivan, 54150, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Choi H, Kim J, Bang KS, Park YH, Lee NJ, Kim C. Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Dec;45(6):939-48. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.6.939.

  • Oh J, Kim SJ, Kim S, Kang KA, Kan J, Bartlett R. Development and evaluation of flipped learning using film clips within a nursing informatics course. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019 Oct;16(4):385-395. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12245. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

  • Kim Y, Kim N, Chae M. Effects of flipped learning on nursing students: A mixed methods study. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2021 May 17:e12425. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12425. Online ahead of print.

  • Wassinger CA, Owens B, Boynewicz K, Williams DA. Flipped classroom versus traditional teaching methods within musculoskeletal physical therapy: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):3169-3179. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1941457. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

  • Njie-Carr VP, Ludeman E, Lee MC, Dordunoo D, Trocky NM, Jenkins LS. An Integrative Review of Flipped Classroom Teaching Models in Nursing Education. J Prof Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;33(2):133-144. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Study Officials

  • Sakarya University

    Sakarya University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This research was planned to examine the effect of flipped learning on students' problem solving and critical thinking skills in nursing process teaching and their views on this model. In the quantitative part of this research, pretest-posttest randomized controlled experimental design, and in the qualitative part case study and phenomenological design will be used. Intervention and control groups will be determined by stratified randomization in line with the pre-test. In the quantitative design, flipped learning will be applied to the intervention group, while the traditional method will be applied to the control group. A focus group discussion will be held with the intervention group after the post-tests are administered.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
RESEARCH ASSISTANT

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2022

First Posted

July 13, 2022

Study Start

February 2, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

February 21, 2022

Last Updated

July 13, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations