Factors in Learning And Plasticity: Macular Degeneration
FLAP
Characterization of Multiple Factors in Training and Plasticity in Central Vision Loss: Macular Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A greater understanding of plasticity after central vision loss can inform new therapies for treating low vision and has the potential to benefit millions of individuals suffering from low vision. The treatment of low vision is particularly relevant to the mission of the NEI to support research on visual disorders, mechanisms of visual function, and preservation of sight. The comparison of different training and outcome factors is in line with the NIMH RDOC framework and studies in an aging population are consistent with the mission of the NIA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
February 9, 2026
February 1, 2026
4 years
July 5, 2022
February 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline Radial Bias from the Crowding Task after completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
The ratio of the crowding threshold along the axis connected to the fovea vs. along the orthogonal axis.
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
Change from Baseline Saccadic Precision after Completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
Consistency across trials in placement of the first saccade calculated by the distribution across trials (bivariate contour ellipse area) of the landing point of the first fixation of each trial.
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
Change from Baseline Fixation Stability after Completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
Normalizing fixations in the PRL to the first fixation to that region and calculating the distribution of all fixation locations in this normalized space (measured as a bivariate contour ellipse area).
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
Other Outcomes (18)
Change from Baseline Acuity after Completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
Change from Baseline Contrast Sensitivity after Completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
Change from Baseline Minimal print size from the MNREAD task after Completion of Training at approximately 7 weeks
Baseline and Within 3 weeks of training completion, training is complete 7 weeks from baseline on average
- +15 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Training visual sensitivity
EXPERIMENTALA standard Perceptual Learning approach to train early visual processes of discriminating the orientation of Gabor patches presented at threshold- level contrast. Preliminary data, using this method, in normally seeing and MD participants show both feasibility and preliminary evidence that this training gives rise to improvements in acuity.
Combination training
EXPERIMENTALIn combination training, investigators test the extent to which a combined training gives rise to the joint benefits of each training individually, or integrative benefits potentially surpassing benefits of the individual training alone. The visual sensitivity task will alternate across blocks with the spatial integration task, using the timing of targets and location switches from spatial attention training.
Interventions
Investigators adopt a standard PL approach to train early visual processes of discriminating the orientation of Gabor patches presented at threshold contrast. Across training blocks, Gabors will range in spatial frequency, where contrast is adapted with a 3/1 staircase. Whenever a specific contrast threshold is reached, spatial frequency will increase by 2 cycles per degree and contrast will be reset. Preliminary data from this method in normally seeing and MD participants show both feasibility and tentative evidence that this training gives rise to improvements in acuity.
Daily tasks involve a combination of being sensitive to basic visual features, being able to integrate these features, and directing attention and eye movements to better evaluate the information of potential interest. To address this integrative nature of real-world vision, this condition combines elements of training visual sensitivity, spatial integration, and spatial attention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-89
- Severely impaired vision in both eyes (20/100 or worse)
- diagnosis of Macular Degeneration by an Ophthalmologist
- Light sensitivity in the macular retina that is at least 10 dB units worse than in peripheral regions, as demonstrated by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (MAIA)
- Medical record review indicating this level of disease severity has been present for at least 2 years
- Reside within 50 miles of study site
You may not qualify if:
- Pacemaker or any ferromagnetic metal implanted in their body
- Metal of any type implanted in their head (limited dental work is acceptable)
- Claustrophobia
- Being hearing-impaired
- Weight over 300 pounds
- Maximum body girth over 60 inches
- Previous serious head injury
- Presence of hallucinations or delusions
- Excessive old, or colorful tattoos, especially near the head
- Pregnancy
- Braces/permanent retainer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UAB
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2022
First Posted
July 12, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Within one year of the final participant completing data collection.
Results of the project will be submitted to the relevant repository (ClinicalTrials.gov, or Open-ScienceFramework, MRI data to OpenfMRI) within one year of the final participant completing data collection. The investigators expect to report participant flow by group (intervention or control), participant demographics (age, sex assigned at birth, years of education), outcome measures and statistical analyses, adverse events (if applicable), and limitations or caveats of our results. The investigators also will ensure that the final protocol and statistical analysis code are uploaded to the record. No Protected Health Information will be shared.