Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of SMART Technique vs ART in Primary Molars
Assistant Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry, Mansoura University (2019)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study conducted on thirty children aged 3-6 years old of both genders, have bilateral carious lower first primary molars. Pre-operative periapical x- ray were taken for both sides. The children were divided into 2 groups(SMART group and ART group). For Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART technique), glass ionomer cement(GIC) was applied according to manufacturer's instructions. For Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART technique), SDF was applied carefully using bended micro sponge brush. It was applied directly to only the affected tooth surface. After one week GIC was applied according to manufacturer's instructions. Clinical and radiographic evaluation were done for all teeth at 6, 12 months. The data were collected then statistically analyzed using chi-square test to show the difference between groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2022
CompletedJune 30, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.1 years
May 10, 2022
June 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
post operative pain
numerical/visual analogue scale 0 no pain 10 worst possible pain
12 months
radiolucency
x ray will be done( qualitative assessment looking for presence of interradicular or periapical radiolucency will be performed and will be scored as yes or no)
12 months
Pathological internal or external root resorption
x ray will be done( qualitative assessment looking for presence of pathological internal or external root resorption will be performed and will be scored as yes or no)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
tooth mobility
12 months
Presence or absence of fistula
12 months
Study Arms (2)
ART group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAtraumatic restorative technique: excavation of caries then application of Glass ionomer capsule (GC, USA)
SMART group
EXPERIMENTALSMART technique: excavation of caries and application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF 38%) then glass ionomer cement
Interventions
silver diamine fluoride (SDF) then glass ionomer cement capsule (GC, USA)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study conducted on thirty children aged 3-6 years old of both genders.
- children in the study were. Apparent healthy and free from any systemic diseases or chronic conditions.
- Child should have bilateral restorable carious lower first primary molars, occlusal caries, ICDAS score (4, 5), asymptomatic or have reversible pulpitis.
- Radiographic examination show intact lamina dura, absence of internal and external pathological root resorption or periapical infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University
Al Mansurah, El Gomhoria Street, Mansoura,egypt, 35511, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Contreras V, Toro MJ, Elias-Boneta AR, Encarnacion-Burgos A. Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride in caries prevention and arrest: a systematic literature review. Gen Dent. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):22-29.
PMID: 28475081BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
sahar mohammed, dentist
Mansoura University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2022
First Posted
June 30, 2022
Study Start
September 30, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
June 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share