NCT05424445

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate efficacy of the cervical ripening of misoprostol administration in oral tablet, Angusta® compared with the off-label solution of misoprostol (Cytotec®) for induction of labor (IOL). Since there is a large cost difference between the preparations (Angusta® is 43 times more expensive than Cytotec®) it is, from a socio-economic perspective, of great interest to evaluate if Angusta can be replaced by Cytotec.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
884

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 21, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 18, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Vaginal delivery within 24 hours (VD 24) rate as difference in proportions in each group according to intention-to-treat (ITT), and per protocol.

    VD24 - (yes/no) is a dichotomous variable extracted from medical records.

    Time point for extraction of data: immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Proportion of vaginal deliveries (VD) in total.

    Time point for extraction of data: immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery.

  • The induction-to-vaginal delivery time.

    Time point for extraction of data:immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery.

  • The mean number of doses of each preparation.

    Time point for extraction of data: immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery.

  • The proportion of neonates with Apgar <7 at 5 minutes.

    Time point for extraction of data: immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery.

  • Postpartum bleeding (PPH) >1000 ml.

    Time point for extraction of data: immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cytotec®

EXPERIMENTAL

IOL with misoprostol oral solution (Cytotec®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.

Drug: Misoprostol

Angusta®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

IOL with misoprostol oral tablets (Angusta®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.

Drug: Misoprostol

Interventions

Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.

Angusta®Cytotec®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Singleton gestations
  • Cephalic presentation
  • ≥37-42+0 weeks of gestation
  • Unfavorable cervix score BS \<6 in nulliparous women and \<5 in parous women
  • All participating women in the studies will receive oral and written information and must give informed consent before participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to understand the study information written in Swedish or English
  • Previous hysterotomy (scar in the uterine myometrium)
  • Non-reassuring cardiotocography (CTG) on admission (the door-test, first 20 minutes of registration of CTG).
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance
  • If active labor has started
  • When oxytocin infusion is already used
  • Placenta previa
  • Renal failure (GFR \<15 ml/min/1.73 m2).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Södersjukhuset

Stockholm, 118 83, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Stephansson O, Petersson K, Bjork C, Conner P, Wikstrom AK. The Swedish Pregnancy Register - for quality of care improvement and research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):466-476. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13266. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

    PMID: 29172245BACKGROUND
  • Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A, Alkmark M, Bergh C, Wendel SB, Fadl H, Jonsson M, Ladfors L, Sengpiel V, Wesstrom J, Wennergren G, Wikstrom AK, Elden H, Stephansson O, Hagberg H. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ. 2019 Nov 20;367:l6131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6131.

    PMID: 31748223BACKGROUND
  • Tang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

    PMID: 23433680BACKGROUND
  • Amini M, Reis M, Wide-Swensson D. A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 12;11:50. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00050. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32116725BACKGROUND
  • Svensk E, Bessfelt E, Brismar Wendel S, Kopp Kallner H, Wallstrom T. Misoprostol as Oral Solution or Oral Tablet for Induction of Labour (MISOBEST): A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):288-296. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17986. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Misoprostol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the study, comparing the same drug but in different preparations, blinding is not deemed feasible.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, senior consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2022

First Posted

June 21, 2022

Study Start

January 21, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2022

Study Completion

May 21, 2023

Last Updated

August 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations