Study Stopped
Difficulty recruiting
A Randomized Trial of Two Regimens of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Termination for Intrauterine Fetal Death
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Misoprostol (Cytotec®) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been marketed in the United States since 1988 as a gastric cytoprotective agent. Despite a focused campaign by the manufacturer to curtail its use in obstetric practice, misoprostol has, over the past several years, gained widespread acceptance to effect the medical termination of pregnancy in the second trimester, either alone or after pretreatment with mifepristone. The primary reasons for this prompt incorporation into standard practice include its low cost and the lack of stringent storage requirements. Vaginal administration seems to be more efficacious than when given orally. The use of sublingual misoprostol for first trimester abortions has been extensively investigated as evidenced by the large number of publications comparing sublingual to other routes of misoprostol for first trimester pregnancy termination, on the assumption that the sublingual route would have a similar efficacy of the vaginal route. In addition, the sublingual route would combine an easier administration with the added advantage of no restriction of mobility after administration. There has been no previous report in the literature comparing the use of misoprostol given sublingually to that given vaginally for the second trimester termination following intrauterine fetal death. Our aim is to compare efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with misoprostol given vaginally (the current standard) to that given sublingually.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2004
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedJuly 19, 2013
July 1, 2013
4.1 years
September 1, 2005
July 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
-The main outcome measures will be the induction time, defined as the time from placement of the first dose of misoprostol until the time of delivery of the fetus.
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The entry characteristics of the patients, including age, height, weight, parity, gestational age at induction, indication for the induction, and cervical score before the start of the induction
48 hours
The delivery rate within 24 hours of prostaglandin commencement
48 hours
Number of doses of misoprostol given
48 hours
Number of unsuccessful inductions
48 hours
Length of hospital stay
48 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORVaginal Cytotec at doses of 400 microgram every 4 hours until delivery
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORSublingual Cytotec at doses of 400 microgram every 4 hours until delivery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- and 24 weeks of gestation
- Both nulliparous and multiparous women
- An unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score less than 8)
You may not qualify if:
- Known contraindications to the use of prostaglandins (e.g. asthma)
- Previous uterine scar (previous cesarean or myomectomy where the endometrial cavity was entered)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Beirut, Lebanon
Related Publications (1)
Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tuncalp O, Lavelanet A, Gulmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
PMID: 34061352DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anwar H Nassar, MD
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2005
First Posted
September 2, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07