NCT06765473

Brief Summary

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most frequently performed operative interventions worldwide \[1\]. Cesarean section rates increase each year throughout the world. Cesarean delivery can lead to some serious maternal and fetal complications \[2\] including primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Primary PPH is defined as a blood loss of more than 1000 ml during the first 24 hours after delivery \[3\], and it is the most common cause of maternal mortality worldwide \[4\]. Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog, commonly used for the prevention and management of PPH. It has potent uterotonic properties and fewer side effects at therapeutic doses \[5\]; it is absorbed orally, vaginally and across the mucous membranes of the rectum and oral cavity \[6\] \[7\] \[8\]. Misoprostol is affordable, widely available, and easily administrated via multiple routes, and has a good safety profile if properly administrated and monitored, all of which might make it the standard treatment option for PPH in low-resource settings \[9\]. The benefits (cervical dilatation and uterine contractions) and the adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and chills) are dose-dependent \[10\]. Hofmeyr et al. studied the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol administered by various routes. According to this study, the oral route has the most rapid uptake, but the shortest duration. The rectal route has slow uptake but prolonged duration. The buccal and sublingual routes have rapid uptake, prolonged duration and greatest total bioavailability \[11\]. Besides that, it can be used for termination of pregnancy in cases of missed or incomplete miscarriage \[12\] \[13\]. Also, in cases with retained placenta, it may have a role in the management of associated bleeding which mostly results from atony \[14\] \[15\]. In the field of gynecology, misoprostol could be used for induction of cervical ripening before office gynecological procedures \[16\] \[17\] \[18\]. This could decrease the associated pain induced by transcervical passage of instruments. Intraoperative blood loss is one of the important complications during CS. In 2011, a systematic review that included twenty-one studies revealed that there is an increased incidence of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion with an increased number of cesarean deliveries \[19\]. Previous reports have shown that misoprostol is effective in reducing blood loss during and after cesarean delivery regardless of route of administration \[20\] . However, the optimum time for administration of misoprostol to decrease the amount of PPH is still under discussion. A. E. A. Youssef et al. DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2019.94052 531 Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Therefore the current study aims to compare the effect of preoperative vaginal and postoperative sublingual administration of misoprostol (800 μg) in reducing the amount of blood loss during and 24 hours after CS. Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most frequently performed operative interventions worldwide \[1\]. Cesarean section rates increase each year throughout the world. Cesarean delivery can lead to some serious maternal and fetal complications \[2\] including primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Primary PPH is defined as a blood loss of more than 1000 ml during the first 24 hours after delivery \[3\], and it is the most common cause of maternal mortality worldwide \[4\]. Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog, commonly used for the prevention and management of PPH. It has potent uterotonic properties and fewer side effects at therapeutic doses \[5\]; it is absorbed orally, vaginally and across the mucous membranes of the rectum and oral cavity \[6\] \[7\] \[8\]. Misoprostol is affordable, widely available, and easily administrated via multiple routes, and has a good safety profile if properly administrated and monitored, all of which might make it the standard treatment option for PPH in low-resource settings \[9\]. The benefits (cervical dilatation and uterine contractions) and the adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and chills) are dose-dependent \[10\]. Hofmeyr et al. studied the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol administered by various routes. According to this study, the oral route has the most rapid uptake, but the shortest duration. The rectal route has slow uptake but prolonged duration. The buccal and sublingual routes have rapid uptake, prolonged duration and greatest total bioavailability \[11\]. Besides that, it can be used for termination of pregnancy in cases of missed or incomplete miscarriage \[12\] \[13\]. Also, in cases with retained placenta, it may have a role in the management of associated bleeding which mostly results from atony \[14\] \[15\]. In the field of gynecology, misoprostol could be used for induction of cervical ripening before office gynecological procedures \[16\] \[17\] \[18\]. This could decrease the associated pain induced by transcervical passage of instruments. Intraoperative blood loss is one of the important complications during

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 27, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 9, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 27, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the amount of blood loss

    the amount of blood loss during and 24 hours after CS

    24 hours

Study Arms (1)

CS group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

women who will undergo elective lower segment CS at term (≥37 weeks) with normal fetal heart tracing

Drug: Misoprostol

Interventions

preoperative vaginal and postoperative sublingual administration of misoprostol (800 μg) to reducing the amount of blood loss during and 24 hours after CS to determine the optimum time for drug administration.

CS group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The study includes women will undergo elective lower segment CS at term (≥37 weeks) with normal fetal heart tracing

You may not qualify if:

  • Women with placenta previa . preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, bleeding tendency, previous history of PPH, concurrent anticoagulant therapy, concurrent long-term use of steroids, fetal distress and antepartum haemorrhage will be excluded from the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Acharya G, Al-Sammarai MT, Patel N, Al-Habib A, Kiserud T. A randomized, controlled trial comparing effect of oral misoprostol and intravenous syntocinon on intra-operative blood loss during cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Mar;80(3):245-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080003245.x.

    PMID: 11207490BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postpartum Hemorrhage

Interventions

Misoprostol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesPuerperal DisordersUterine HemorrhageHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Central Study Contacts

Ahmed Mohamed Hatem Fouad, resident doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
resident doctor at Assiut University hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2024

First Posted

January 9, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01