Titrated Oral Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to estimate the safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol compared with vaginal route for labor induction at term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2007
CompletedSeptember 14, 2007
September 1, 2006
September 13, 2007
September 13, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The interval from the first misoprostol dose to vaginal delivery and the percentage of women who delivered infants vaginally within 12 and 24 hours of induction. The incidence of tachysystole, hypertonus, uterine hyperstimulation and neonatal outcomes.
within the first week after delivery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Total dosage of misoprostol and the rate of women given oxytocin, cesarean section and induction failure.
The days during induction
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALTitrated oral misoprostol
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORVaginal misoprostol
Interventions
Titrated oral misoprostol: one tablet of 200 microgram was dissolved in water 200 ml, and 20 ml P.O. per one hour for 4 doses, then titrated against uterine response; Vaginal misoprostol: 25 microgram per vagina
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 42 weeks of gestation
- live singleton
- Bishop score \< or = 6
- reassuring fetal heart beat pattern
You may not qualify if:
- nonreassuring fetal heart beat pattern
- parity ovr five
- any contraindication to labor and/or vaginal delivery
- uterine scar
- suspected placental abruption with abnormal FHR pattern
- vaginal bleeding other than "bloody show"
- cervical dilatation of \> or = 4 cm
- uterine contractions \> or = 3 in 10 minutes
- significant maternal cardiac, renal or hepatic disease
- hypersensitivity to misoprostol or prostaglandin analogs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
China Medical University Beigang Hospital
Douliu, 651, Taiwan
Related Publications (3)
Hofmeyr GJ, Alfirevic Z, Matonhodze B, Brocklehurst P, Campbell E, Nikodem VC. Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial. BJOG. 2001 Sep;108(9):952-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00231.x.
PMID: 11563466RESULTKerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, Weeks AD. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 22;6(6):CD014484. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014484.
PMID: 34155622DERIVEDCheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000297313.68644.71.
PMID: 18165400DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shi-Yann Cheng, M.D.
Chinal Medical University Beigang Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2007
First Posted
September 14, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2005
Study Completion
March 1, 2007
Last Updated
September 14, 2007
Record last verified: 2006-09