Compressive Elastic Dressing Versus TR Band
Band Vs Gauze
Comparison Between Compressive Elastic Dressing and Hemostatic TR Band Following Cardiac Intervention Utilizing the Radial Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Radial approach is widely established in cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. It has been shown to decrease bleeding, vascular problems, and mortality rates when compared to the femoral approach. It also offers better comfort to patients through early mobility and lowers hospital expenses. Previously, there were no specific devices for radial artery hemostasis. Many different types of dressings were used in various hospitals with no standardization. This raises the question of whether specific devices surpass dressings in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular complications. The primary goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of compression dressings and hemostatic wristbands on patients undergoing cardiac procedures via radial approach in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular problems. The hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized in one group, while compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, was used in the other.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2022
CompletedSeptember 29, 2022
September 1, 2022
5 months
June 4, 2022
September 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Compression "hemostasis" time
The time from the placement of the hemostatic Wristband or Compressive dressing until its removal (when there's no blood oozing after removal), measured by minutes.
Up to 240 minutes after placement
Number of patient with Hematoma and Grade of hematoma
It is defined by EASY hematoma scale.
Within 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of patient with Radial artery occlusion
Within 24 hours after the procedure
Ischemic changes to the hand
Within 24 hours after the procedure
Post-procedural pain
Within 24 hours after the procedure
Number of patient with Radial Artery Occlusion on follow up
After 4 weeks of the procedure.
Patient satisfaction of the used compression methode Assessed by Likert scale for satisfaction
Within 24 hrs
Study Arms (2)
Compressive Elastic dressing
EXPERIMENTALPatients who received compressive elastic dressing as a hemostasis technique after coronary angiography using radial approach.
wristband TR Band
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who received wristband TR Band as a hemostasis technique after coronary angiography using radial approach.
Interventions
Following cardiac procedure using radial approach, compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, fixed with elastic crepe bandage was used to achieve hemostasis.
Following cardiac procedure using radial approach, hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized was used to achieve hemostasis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the consent form.
- Patients with an indication for coronary catheterization
- Clinically stable patients
- Patients with palpable pulses on at least one of the radial arteries.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure less 90mmhg)
- Patients with radial AV shunt for hemodialysis
- Patients with previous CABG using radial artery
- Patients with Renaud phenomenon or lymphedema
- Patients who had vascular problems at the puncture site before the hemostasis process started.
- Failure to obtain radial access
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
An-Najah National University Hospital
Nablus, West Bank, P4170051, Palestinian Territories
An-Najah National University Hospital
Nablus, Palestinian Territories
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yunis A Daralammouri
An-Najah National University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients enrolled to the study were randomized into TR Band or compressive dressing groups. Care providers operated on patients and investigators collected their data during and after the operation. The independent variable - Hemostasis technique (TR Band or compressive dressing ) - was coded into X or Z groups, then data was sent to the outcomes assessor.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2022
First Posted
June 8, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2021
Study Completion
May 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09