NCT03583320

Brief Summary

Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain (ACP) possibly due to Coronary artery disease (CAD), with a normal heart tracing (ECG), need to have further troponin blood tests to confirm or exclude a heart attack. After initial troponin testing, a significant 50-85% of patients are said to be in an "observational zone" as one cannot confirm or exclude a diagnosis of a heart attack. Even after repeat blood testing, 22-33% remain in this "observational zone". These patients can be challenging to manage as they are not safe to be discharged home, but they also cannot be treated as a heart attack. This contributes to ED overcrowding and uncertainty in treatment plans.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 12, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2018

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 5, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary objective will be to compare median hospital length of stay in each arm.

    as above

    Through 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Number of admissions in each arm; • Number of admissions in each arm; Number of hospital admissions in each arm

    Through 1 year

  • Number of hospital discharges in each arm

    Through 1 year

  • Time taken to arrive at decision for admission or discharge

    Through 1 year

  • Number of additional investigations during hospital stay (if admitted)

    Through 1 year

  • Proportion of patients with completeness of diagnosis on discharge

    Through 1 year

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Differences in terms of radiation dose in each arm.

    Through 1 year

  • Cost of the index emergency department hospital visit

    Through 1 year

  • Total hospital admission costs in each arm

    Through 1 year

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm A (Cardiac CT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomised to Arm A i.e. the intervention arm will under go standard of care patient hospital management but will also have cardiac CT angiogram (CTCA) carried out. Their subsequent clinical management will be left to clinician discretion in light of the additional CTCA results.

Diagnostic Test: Cardiac CT angiogram

Arm B (Standard of care arm)

NO INTERVENTION

Patients randomised to Arm B will receive usual standard of care management guided by serial troponin blood tests. These patients will also under go cardiac CT angiogram (CTCA) but these scans will not be used for the patients' in-hospital care. Furthermore, unlike Arm A, CTCA interpretation followed by reporting will not take place in the acute hospital setting and therefore will be carried out within the following three weeks. Should the CTCA be found to have significant high risk CAD e.g. \>50% stenosis in the left main (LM) coronary artery, and/or \>50% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, they will be un-blinded and kept in a separate registry. Their results will be discussed with the hospital care team and if they have not had any invasive coronary imaging during the preceding hospital admission, an urgent cardiology out-patient referral will be made to enable further clinical management.

Interventions

Cardiac CT angiogramDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To the best of the author's knowledge this study will provide the first prospective and randomised data pertaining to hospital length of stay as a primary outcome in the use of CTCA on this acute chest pain cohort (with an intermediate observational zone category) on initial high sensitivity-cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) results presenting to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital.

Arm A (Cardiac CT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients above 18 years of age with ischaemic sounding chest pain prompting visit to the emergency department (suspected ACS).
  • No-ischaemic ECG changes (i.e. no ST-segment elevation or depression 1mm in 2 or more contiguous leads, and/or T-wave inversions).
  • Episode of chest pain within last 12 hours.
  • Initial troponin in the intermediate range (5-50ng/L).

You may not qualify if:

  • STEMI.
  • Signs and symptoms of acute heart failure and/or haemodynamic instability.
  • Dynamic ischaemic ECG changes.
  • Patient not suitable to undergo CTCA
  • Inability to breath hold for 10 seconds
  • Severe renal impairment (eGFR \<30 mL/min)
  • Contraindication to beta-blockers (not relevant for patients with baseline sinus rhythm at rate of \<63bpm)
  • Atrial Fibrillation on ECG.
  • Patients with known significant obstructive coronary artery disease (\>50% stenosis) on previous invasive or CT coronary angiogram.
  • Patients with previous PCI/CABG revascularisation.
  • Patients with a history of congenital heart disease.
  • Patients with known coronary artery anomalies.
  • Patients who lack capacity to give consent or participate in the study.
  • Previous recruitment to the present study.
  • Known pregnancy or patients who are currently breast feeding.
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J. The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart. 2005 Feb;91(2):229-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027599. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15657244BACKGROUND
  • Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax JJ, Borger MA, Brotons C, Chew DP, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey RF, Windecker S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26320110BACKGROUND
  • Rubini Gimenez M, Hoeller R, Reichlin T, Zellweger C, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, Moehring B, Wildi K, Mosimann T, Mueller M, Meller B, Hochgruber T, Ziller R, Sou SM, Murray K, Sakarikos K, Ernst S, Gea J, Campodarve I, Vilaplana C, Haaf P, Steuer S, Minners J, Osswald S, Mueller C. Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.049. Epub 2013 Jul 20.

    PMID: 23876467BACKGROUND
  • Marjot J, Kaier TE, Henderson K, Hunter L, Marber MS, Perera D. A single centre prospective cohort study addressing the effect of a rule-in/rule-out troponin algorithm on routine clinical practice. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Aug;8(5):404-411. doi: 10.1177/2048872617746850. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

    PMID: 29199434BACKGROUND
  • Ferencik M, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Maurovich-Horvat P, Pope JH, Truong QA, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, White CS, Woodard PK, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Januzzi JL, Hoffmann U. hs-Troponin I Followed by CT Angiography Improves Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification Accuracy and Work-Up in Acute Chest Pain Patients: Results From ROMICAT II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1272-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

    PMID: 26476506BACKGROUND
  • Lindahl B, Jernberg T, Badertscher P, Boeddinghaus J, Eggers KM, Frick M, Rubini Gimenez M, Linder R, Ljung L, Martinsson A, Melki D, Nestelberger T, Rentsch K, Reichlin T, Sabti Z, Schubera M, Svensson P, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Mueller C. An algorithm for rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using a novel troponin I assay. Heart. 2017 Jan 15;103(2):125-131. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309951. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

    PMID: 27486143BACKGROUND
  • Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordonez-Llanos J, deFilippi C, McCord J, Body R, Panteghini M, Jernberg T, Plebani M, Verschuren F, French J, Christenson R, Weiser S, Bendig G, Dilba P, Lindahl B; TRAPID-AMI Investigators. Multicenter Evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):76-87.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

    PMID: 26794254BACKGROUND
  • Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Gimenez MR, Bergsma N, Haaf P, Druey S, Puelacher C, Moehring B, Freese M, Stelzig C, Krivoshei L, Hillinger P, Jager C, Herrmann T, Kreutzinger P, Radosavac M, Weidmann ZM, Pershyna K, Honegger U, Wagener M, Vuillomenet T, Campodarve I, Bingisser R, Miro O, Rentsch K, Bassetti S, Osswald S, Mueller C. Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. CMAJ. 2015 May 19;187(8):E243-E252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141349. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

    PMID: 25869867BACKGROUND
  • Mokhtari A, Borna C, Gilje P, Tyden P, Lindahl B, Nilsson HJ, Khoshnood A, Bjork J, Ekelund U. A 1-h Combination Algorithm Allows Fast Rule-Out and Rule-In of Major Adverse Cardiac Events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 5;67(13):1531-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.059.

    PMID: 27150684BACKGROUND
  • Jaeger C, Wildi K, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Rubini Gimenez M, Neuhaus JD, Grimm K, Boeddinghaus J, Hillinger P, Nestelberger T, Singeisen H, Gugala M, Pretre G, Puelacher C, Wagener M, Honegger U, Schumacher C, Moreno Weidmann Z, Kreutzinger P, Krivoshei L, Freese M, Stelzig C, Dietsche S, Ernst S, Rentsch K, Osswald S, Mueller C. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J. 2016 Jan;171(1):92-102.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

    PMID: 26699605BACKGROUND
  • Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Ross MA, O'Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 27;49(8):863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

    PMID: 17320744BACKGROUND
  • Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.

    PMID: 19007693BACKGROUND
  • Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 27;359(22):2324-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576.

    PMID: 19038879BACKGROUND
  • Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, Nieman K, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Weustink AC, de Vos AM, Pugliese F, Rensing B, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, Prokop M, Doevendans PA, Hunink MG, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 16;52(25):2135-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058.

    PMID: 19095130BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, Nichols JH, Rogers IS, Seneviratne SK, Truong QA, Cury RC, Abbara S, Shapiro MD, Moloo J, Butler J, Ferencik M, Lee H, Jang IK, Parry BA, Brown DF, Udelson JE, Achenbach S, Brady TJ, Nagurney JT. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 5;53(18):1642-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052.

    PMID: 19406338BACKGROUND
  • Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL; CT-STAT Investigators. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068.

    PMID: 21939822BACKGROUND
  • Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Hoffmann V, Achenbach S, Nikolaou K, Conen D, Reiser MF, Hoffmann U, Becker CR. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the long-term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 14;57(24):2426-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.043.

    PMID: 21658564BACKGROUND
  • Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, Lippolis NJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.067. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

    PMID: 17868808BACKGROUND
  • Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 8;57(10):1237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

    PMID: 21145688BACKGROUND
  • Mahmoudi M, Harden S, Abid N, Peebles C, Nicholas Z, Jones T, McKenzie D, Curzen N. Troponin-positive chest pain with unobstructed coronary arteries: definitive differential diagnosis using cardiac MRI. Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e461-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/90663866. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

    PMID: 22457316BACKGROUND
  • Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, Lammers J, Lamfers EJ, Rensing BJ, Braam RL, Nathoe HM, Post JC, Nielen T, Beelen D, le Cocq d'Armandville MC, Rood PP, Schultz CJ, Moelker A, Ouhlous M, Boersma E, Nieman K. Coronary CT Angiography for Suspected ACS in the Era of High-Sensitivity Troponins: Randomized Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.045.

    PMID: 26764061BACKGROUND
  • Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975 Apr;51(4 Suppl):5-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.4.5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1116248BACKGROUND
  • Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, Nieman K, Pontone G, Raff GL. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Sep-Oct;8(5):342-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 24. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25301040BACKGROUND
  • Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8 Suppl):C13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065.

    PMID: 16631505BACKGROUND
  • Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA, Tresoldi S, Rulli E, Cornalba G, Sardanelli F. Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):555-64. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10306.

    PMID: 23971446BACKGROUND
  • Aziz W, Morgan H, Demir OM, Sinha A, Rua T, Rajani R, Chang AL, Woo E, Mak SM, Benedetti G, Villa A, Preston R, Navin R, O'Kane K, Hunter L, Ismail T, Carr-White G, Beckley-Hoelscher N, Peacock J, Marber M, Razavi R, Perera D. Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT). Heart. 2022 Nov 24;108(24):1972-1978. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320990.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chest PainCoronary Artery DiseaseAcute Coronary SyndromeMyocardial Ischemia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCoronary DiseaseHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
As stated earlier for patients assigned to Arm B i.e. the control arm (standard of care arm) who undergo CTCA, the results will not be released to the patient and their medical care givers in hospital. CTCA interpretation followed by reporting will not take place in the acute hospital setting and therefore will be carried out within the following three weeks. Should the CTCA be found to have significant high risk CAD e.g. \>50% stenosis in the left main (LM) coronary artery, and/or \>50% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, they will be un-blinded and kept in a separate registry. Their results will be discussed with the hospital care team and if they have not had any invasive coronary imaging during the preceding hospital admission, an urgent cardiology out-patient referral will be made to enable further clinical management.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Once patients consent to participate in the study, they will be randomised into the intervention group (i.e. with CTCA) or the control group (i.e. hs-cTn based standard of care) on a 1:1 ratio. For purposes of Study 2, the control group of patients will also be consented to undergo CTCA. However, CTCA will not form part of their in-patient clinical management as the clinical teams will be blinded from CTCA findings (except for cases of prognostically significant coronary disease e.g. 50% stenosis of the LM and/or proximal LAD coronary arteries).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2018

First Posted

July 11, 2018

Study Start

January 12, 2018

Primary Completion

April 5, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2020

Last Updated

July 30, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
The IPD that underlie results in a publication will become available in publications during 24 months following recruitment of the final patient in the trial.
Access Criteria
IPD may be looked at by the primary research team, research regulatory authorities, responsible individuals from King's College London and Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital.

Locations