Distal vs. Forearm Radial Artery Access
DRAvsFRA
Distal Radial Artery Access in Comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization, a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Distal Radial Access (DRA) to the coronaries has emerged recently. It's done via the distal radial artery in the radial fossa, which is known as the snuff-box. The rationale of conducting this research is to assess this new access advantages and disadvantages, in comparison with the standard conventional forearm radial access and examine if it's worthy to be a future alternative method for coronary angiography. It aims to randomly compare between the new distal radial access via the snuffbox and the conventional forearm radial access for percutaneous coronary angiography and angioplasty procedures. The objectives of comparing both procedures are to analyze the frequency of complications in terms of occlusion, arterial spasm, hematoma, and to weigh accesses effectiveness in terms of time and attempts to puncture, crossover rate, procedure duration, hemostasis time, and convenience of the patients and operators. Candidates for coronary angiography are being randomized into the interventional group to undergo the angiography through the distal radial artery as the access site, or the control group accessing through the radial artery in the forearm. Procedural and post procedural outcomes and complications are being reported while patients are in hospital. All patients undergo doppler ultrasonography within 24 hours after the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2020
CompletedJune 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.1 years
September 29, 2019
June 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radial artery occlusion
Doppler Ultrasonography of the radial artery for occlusions along its course, in both groups.
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Puncture Time
During the procedure
Puncture Attempts
During the procedure
Procedure Duration
During the procedure
Radiation Duration
During the procedure
Radiology Dose
During the procedure
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Distal Radial
EXPERIMENTALPatients who undergo coronary catheterization by accessing the distal radial artery in the snuff-box of the hand.
Forearm Radial
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who undergo conventional coronary catheterization by accessing the forearm radial artery.
Interventions
The patient grasps his thumb towards the palm to bring the radial artery up to the surface. The left hand is set on the right side of the groin toward the operator, who stands on the right side, with the dorsal surface of hand upwards. Afterward, the access site is disinfected, lidocaine HCL is SC injected for local anesthesia. Subsequently, the distal radial artery is palpated to find the point of the strongest pulse. Later, at a 45-degree angle, the artery is punctured with a 21-gauge needle and a 0.018 soft, flexible, metallic wire is then inserted in the needle. Through the sheath, 200 micrograms of Nitroglycerin is given. A 5000 unit of unfractionated heparin is administered through the IV line. A weight-adjusted dose of heparin is further added if PCI is needed. Then, a 0.035 wire is introduced in the sheath with other required instruments such as the intracoronary device and the catheters. After pulling out the sheath, a compression device, Safe Guard, is used for hemostasis.
The right hand is set in the anatomical position, with the anterior surface of arm face upwards. Afterward, the access site is disinfected, lidocaine HCL is SC injected for local anesthesia. Subsequently, the forearm radial artery is palpated to find the point of the strongest pulse. Later, at a 45-degree angle, the artery is punctured with a 21-gauge needle and a 0.018 soft, flexible, metallic wire is then inserted in the needle. Through the sheath, 200 micrograms of Nitroglycerin is given. A 5000 unit of unfractionated heparin is administered through the IV line. A weight-adjusted dose of heparin is further added if PCI is needed. Then, a 0.035 wire is introduced in the sheath with other required instruments such as the intracoronary device and the catheters. After pulling out the sheath, a compression device, TR band, is used for hemostasis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the consent form.
- Patients with an indication for coronary catheterization
- Clinically stable patients
- Patients with palpable pulses on both access sites of the radial artery.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with STEMI
- Patients with radial AV shunt for hemodialysis
- Patients with previous CABG using radial artery
- Patients with previous CABG using LIMA, RIMA or both.
- Patients with Renaud phenomenon or lymphedema
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
An-Najah National University Hospital
Nablus, Palestinian Territories
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yunis Daralammouri, asst. prof.
An-Najah National University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients enrolled to the study were randomized into Forearm Radial or Distal Radial groups. Care providers operated on patients and investigators collected their data during and after the operation. The independent variable - Access site (Forearm Radial or Distal Radial) - was coded into X or Z groups, then data was sent to the outcomes assessor.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2019
First Posted
October 14, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 21, 2020
Study Completion
December 21, 2020
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06