NCT05827237

Brief Summary

The goal of this clustered, diagnostic randomized controlled trial is to study a clinical decision rule including a high-sensitive troponin I point of care test in patients with chest pain in primary care. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Can unnecessary referrals to secondary care be reduced by the use of a clinical deci-sion rule in patients with new onset, non-traumatic chest pain in primary care? Compared to current daily practice.
  2. 2.What is the accuracy (sensitivity, negative prediction value) of the clinical decision rule for excluding ACS and MACE at 6 weeks and 6 months?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
946

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 18, 2021

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 5, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 10, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Chest painPrimary careGeneral practiceMyocardial infarctionTroponinPoint of care test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Hospital referral rate for acute chest pain

    hospital referral rate for acute chest pain compared between intervention and control group

    24 hours after inclusion

  • Hospital referral rate for acute chest pain

    hospital referral rate for acute chest pain compared between intervention and control group

    6 weeks after inclusion

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule

    Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.

    24 hours after inclusion

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule

    Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.

    6 weeks after inclusion

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule

    Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.

    6 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Cost-effectiveness

    6 months

  • Adherence to the recommendations of the clinical decision rule by general practitioners (GP)

    24 hours after inclusion

  • Patient reassurance measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    1 week after inclusion

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the gut feeling/ presence of a sense of alarm from general practitioners

    6 weeks after inclusion

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART-score

    6 weeks after inclusion

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Clinical decision rule

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in whom the clinical decision rule is used to exclude acute coronary syndrome

Diagnostic Test: Clinical decision rule

Standard care

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in whom the general practitioner decides upon referral following local guidelines.

Interventions

Clinical decision ruleDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Clinical decision rule for acute chest pain, consisting of the Marburg Heart Score (5 questions) combined with a high-sensitive troponin I point of care test

Clinical decision rule

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Acute chest pain
  • Seen by general practitioner

You may not qualify if:

  • \<1 hour since onset of symptoms
  • Inability to speak or understand Dutch
  • Hemodynamic instability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2300 RC, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • van den Bulk S, Petrus AHJ, Willemsen RTA, Boogers MJ, Meeder JG, Rahel BM, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Numans ME, Dinant GJ, Bonten TN. Ruling out acute coronary syndrome in primary care with a clinical decision rule and a capillary, high-sensitive troponin I point of care test: study protocol of a diagnostic RCT in the Netherlands (POB HELP). BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 8;13(6):e071822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071822.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chest PainMyocardial InfarctionAcute Coronary Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesNecrosis

Study Officials

  • Tobias Bonten, MD PhD

    LUMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A clustered randomized controlled trial in which general practices are randomized to the intervention- or control group in 2:1 ratio.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Posted

April 25, 2023

Study Start

August 18, 2021

Primary Completion

February 5, 2025

Study Completion

April 23, 2025

Last Updated

September 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the main article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following main article publication
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Locations