Rule Out of ACS in Primary Care Using a Decision Rule for Chest Pain Including Hs-troponin I POCT
POB HELP
Primary Care Decision Rule for Chest Pain Using the Marburg Heart Score and Hs-troponin I Point of Care Test to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
946
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clustered, diagnostic randomized controlled trial is to study a clinical decision rule including a high-sensitive troponin I point of care test in patients with chest pain in primary care. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Can unnecessary referrals to secondary care be reduced by the use of a clinical deci-sion rule in patients with new onset, non-traumatic chest pain in primary care? Compared to current daily practice.
- 2.What is the accuracy (sensitivity, negative prediction value) of the clinical decision rule for excluding ACS and MACE at 6 weeks and 6 months?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 23, 2025
CompletedSeptember 10, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.5 years
March 21, 2023
September 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Hospital referral rate for acute chest pain
hospital referral rate for acute chest pain compared between intervention and control group
24 hours after inclusion
Hospital referral rate for acute chest pain
hospital referral rate for acute chest pain compared between intervention and control group
6 weeks after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule
Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.
24 hours after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule
Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.
6 weeks after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rule
Diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, negative predictive value) for ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) MACE is defined as a combined endpoint of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography revealing procedurally correctable stenosis managed conservatively and all-cause mortality.
6 months after inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Cost-effectiveness
6 months
Adherence to the recommendations of the clinical decision rule by general practitioners (GP)
24 hours after inclusion
Patient reassurance measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
1 week after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of the gut feeling/ presence of a sense of alarm from general practitioners
6 weeks after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART-score
6 weeks after inclusion
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Clinical decision rule
EXPERIMENTALPatients in whom the clinical decision rule is used to exclude acute coronary syndrome
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in whom the general practitioner decides upon referral following local guidelines.
Interventions
Clinical decision rule for acute chest pain, consisting of the Marburg Heart Score (5 questions) combined with a high-sensitive troponin I point of care test
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years of age
- Acute chest pain
- Seen by general practitioner
You may not qualify if:
- \<1 hour since onset of symptoms
- Inability to speak or understand Dutch
- Hemodynamic instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2300 RC, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
van den Bulk S, Petrus AHJ, Willemsen RTA, Boogers MJ, Meeder JG, Rahel BM, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Numans ME, Dinant GJ, Bonten TN. Ruling out acute coronary syndrome in primary care with a clinical decision rule and a capillary, high-sensitive troponin I point of care test: study protocol of a diagnostic RCT in the Netherlands (POB HELP). BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 8;13(6):e071822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071822.
PMID: 37290947DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tobias Bonten, MD PhD
LUMC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2023
First Posted
April 25, 2023
Study Start
August 18, 2021
Primary Completion
February 5, 2025
Study Completion
April 23, 2025
Last Updated
September 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following main article publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the main article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices)