Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement In The Esthetic Zone Using the Bone Shielding Concept Versus Dual Zone Therapy
The Bone Shielding Versus Dual Zone Concept in Treating Thin Walled Fresh Extraction Sockets With Immediate Implant Placement Soft and Hard Tissue Changes A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Immediate implant placement has proven to be a successful treatment procedure that is preferred by patients because of being less traumatic, more time-efficient. Nowadays, the main goal of a successful immediate implant treatment has ceased to be gaining stability and osseointegration, but achieving long-term dimensional stability has become the optimal challenge. Various soft tissue and hard tissue augmentation techniques have been investigated in order to maintain the ridge dimensions following extraction and immediate implant placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2022
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
9 months
May 11, 2022
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pink Esthetic Score
Pink Esthetic Score 1-14 score PES
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
labial bone thickness
6 months
Peri-implant probing depth
6 months
Implant failure
6 months
Study Arms (2)
immediate implant placement with The Dual-Zone Therapeutic Concept
ACTIVE COMPARATORImmediate implant placement with the bone shielding concept
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
After tooth removal, implant placement, bone grafting, and screw retained provisional restoration, the contour of the ridge can change. Using dual zone grafting was claimed to minimize contour change associated with immediate anterior implants. In this technique. The implant should be placed in an optimal 3 dimensional mode . Xenograft, will be used in the gap to graft the bone and tissue zones, . The graft material helps serve as a scaffold to maintain hard- and soft-tissue volume as well as blood clot for initial healing.
After atraumatic tooth extraction using periotomes and luxators , socket curettage and cleaning simultaneously using an irrigation curette will be performed. Sulcular dissection of the attached tissue close to the socket orifice incisal and apically will be done using periotome to create a tunnel via the socket orifice. Dental implant will be placed. complete access of the labial plate of bone where all the regenerative materials will be performed to have the bone sheild delivered. A membrane will be inserted to the labial tunnel and tacked using 2 membrane tacks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult (\>18 years) patients having a single non-adjacent hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
- type I socket (intact but thin labial plate of bone and intact overlying soft tissues)
- adequate palatal bone
- ≥3 mm apical bone to engage the immediately placed implants
- optimum primary stability (a minimum of 30 Ncm insertion torque) following tooth extraction.
You may not qualify if:
- smokers
- pregnant women
- patients with systemic diseases
- periodontal disease, gingival recession
- infected sockets
- periapical pathosis and history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past 2 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
ElAskary dental center
Alexandria, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Elaskary A, Ghallab N, Thabet A, Shemais N. The bone shielding versus dual-zone concept in treating thin-walled fresh extraction sockets with immediate implant placement: Soft and hard tissue changes. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Feb;26(1):66-77. doi: 10.1111/cid.13275. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
PMID: 37669913DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdelsalam El Askary
private practice, Alexandria, Egypt
- STUDY CHAIR
Noha A Ghallab, PhD
Professor in the department of oral Medicine & Periodontology, Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nesma M shemais, PhD
Lecturer in the department of oral Medicine & Periodontology, Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD holder Lecturer in the department of Oral Medicine & Periodontology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2022
First Posted
May 19, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 15, 2022
Study Completion
December 15, 2022
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share