NCT05673122

Brief Summary

Primary Objective: Evaluate of labial plate of bone changes using immediate implant with the socket shield technique in anterior esthetic zone. Secondary Objective: Evaluate of soft tissue changes using the immediate implant with socket shield technique in anterior esthetic zone.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 6, 2023

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

extraction socketimmediate implantssocket shieldlabial bone thickness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change of labial bone thickness

    With the help of CBCT ;Horizontal bone level measurement: Three horizontal lines are drawn 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to implant platform to outer surface of buccal plate of bone. Facial plate of bone is taken as a reference point and is measured baseline (after implant placement and at 6 months follow up).

    baseline at day of surgery and after 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pink esthetic score (PES)

    baseline presurgery and after 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Implant intact with shield

EXPERIMENTAL

Ten patients undergo flapless single immediate implant placement surgery with socket shield technique, the implant is in contact with the shield.

Device: Implant(Flotecno)

Implant not intact with shield

EXPERIMENTAL

Ten patients undergo flapless single immediate implant placement surgery with socket shield technique, there was a jumping gap more than 2mm between the shield and the implant, in which the gap was grafted with Xenograft.

Device: Implant(Flotecno)

Interventions

The implants It has a tapered body design and Sandblasting with Large grit that facilitates the osseointergration process. made in Italy Flotecno srl via.Turati,38 20121 MILANO (Italia)

Implant intact with shieldImplant not intact with shield

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Sufficient hard and soft tissue volume in vertical and buccolingual direction (Levine et al., 2014) 7. Good oral hygiene. 8. Indication for tooth extraction included :( Degidi et al., 2010)
  • Non-restorable teeth
  • Remaining roots
  • Endodontic failures

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Pregnant and breast feeding. 3. Smokers. (Takamiya et al., 2013) 4. Decision impaired individuals (prisoners, handicapped, and mentally retarded) 5. Vertical or Horizontal root fractures on buccal aspect below bone level. 6. External or internal root resorption.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Nasr City, 0020, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Abdullah AH, Abdel Gaber HK, Adel-Khattab D. Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):548-558. doi: 10.1111/cid.13117. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

    PMID: 35763398BACKGROUND
  • Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon's perception and objective measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):558-61.

    PMID: 20556255BACKGROUND
  • Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.

    PMID: 16307569BACKGROUND
  • Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):521-7.

    PMID: 18092446BACKGROUND
  • Gluckman H, Nagy K, Du Toit J. Prosthetic management of implants placed with the socket-shield technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):581-585. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

    PMID: 30554825BACKGROUND
  • Mourya A, Mishra SK, Gaddale R, Chowdhary R. Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Nov;10(4):e12449. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12449. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

    PMID: 31433130BACKGROUND
  • Lin X, Gao Y, Ding X, Zheng X. Socket shield technique: A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Apr 27;66(2):226-235. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00262. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

    PMID: 34526435BACKGROUND
  • Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x.

    PMID: 22211305BACKGROUND
  • Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.

    PMID: 20712701BACKGROUND
  • Vittorini Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, de Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1049-61. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2670.

    PMID: 23869363BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ahmed A Hassan, Prof.Dr

    Ain Shams University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Asrar M Althabet, MSC

    Faculty of dentistry Ain Shams University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mohamed W Bissar, Ass.Prof

CONTACT

Mohamed Sh El-Mofty, Prof.Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The patients were assigned in two allocated groups using computer randomization "random allocation software" into one of the 2 groups
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Twenty patients were randomly assigned by specific computer software into two groups either in group (I) or group (II). Group I: Ten patients undergo flapless single immediate implant placement surgery with socket shield technique, the implant is in contact with the shield. Group II: Ten patients undergo flapless single immediate implant placement surgery with socket shield technique, there was a jumping gap more than 2mm between the shield and the implant, in which the gap was grafted with Xenograft.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2023

First Posted

January 6, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion

February 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

January 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Locations