Supportive Care Intervention (ROAR-LCT) for Patients With Stage IIIA, IIIB, and IV Lung Cancer, ROAR-LCT Trial
Resiliency Among Older Adults Receiving Lung Cancer Treatment (ROAR-LCT): A Phase II Randomized Supportive Care Intervention Clinical Trial
3 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This phase II trial tests whether a supportive care intervention (Resiliency among Older Adults Receiving Lung Cancer Treatment \[ROAR-LCT\]) is effective in improving physical and emotional wellbeing in patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, and IV lung cancer undergoing cancer treatment. Lung cancers are one of the most common cancers. Lung cancers occur in the chest and often cause symptoms for patients. Poor physical performance and negative mood are two risk factors for a decline in functional status. Targeted interventions may address these two risk factors and improve functional status and resilience. Physical therapy and relaxation interventions (i.e. progressive muscle relaxation) are two such interventions that may improve symptoms and quality of life for patients with cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 21, 2025
August 1, 2025
3.5 years
March 1, 2022
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Study adherence
Study adherence will be defined as the completion of 70% of the program sessions, repeated assessments, and collection of biospecimens either at the end of the study period or death, whichever occurs first.
Up to 12 weeks
Retention
Retention rates will be defined as the percentage of participants not lost to follow-up at 1.5 months,
1.5 month
Retention
Retention rates will be defined as the percentage of participants not lost to follow-up at 3 months
3 Month
Retention
Retention rates will be defined as the percentage of participants not lost to follow-up at 6 months
6 Month
Amount and duration of therapy that participants were able to complete
sessions completed, weeks it takes to complete all 12 session; missed sessions; reasons for missed sessions
Week 12
Amount and duration of therapy that participants were able to complete
sessions completed, weeks it takes to complete all 12 session; missed sessions; reasons for missed sessions
Week 24
Preliminary effect on functional status
A joint model using group-based trajectory modeling will be used to estimate clinically distinct trajectories of functional status and attrition probability (death or dropout). These models will be used to evaluate differences in change of functional scores between study arms through 3 months of follow-up. Additionally, generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) will be used to model change in functional status from baseline to 3 months to explore if the intervention has both an immediate and sustained impact on function.
3 Month
Preliminary effect on functional status
A joint model using group-based trajectory modeling will be used to estimate clinically distinct trajectories of functional status and attrition probability (death or dropout). These models will be used to evaluate differences in change of functional scores between study arms through 6 months of follow-up. Additionally, generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) will be used to model change in functional status from baseline 6 months to explore if the intervention has both an immediate and sustained impact on function.
6 Month
Preliminary effect on functional status
A joint model using group-based trajectory modeling will be used to estimate clinically distinct trajectories of functional status and attrition probability (death or dropout). These models will be used to evaluate differences in change of functional scores between study arms through 12 months of follow-up. Additionally, generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) will be used to model change in functional status from baseline to 12 months to explore if the intervention has both an immediate and sustained impact on function.
12 month
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Physical capability
Up to 12 weeks
Incidence and severity of toxicity
Up to 12 weeks
Psychological symptoms
Up to 12 weeks
Psychological Symptoms
Up to 12 weeks
Physical function
Up to 12 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (ROAR-LCT intervention)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive ROAR-LCT intervention weekly for 12 weeks consisting of physical therapy visits and an exercise intervention. Patients also undergo progressive muscles relaxation exercises over 20 minutes for 12 weeks.
Arm II (standard of care)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive standard of care for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Receive standard of care
Undergo physical therapy
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo progressive muscles relaxation exercises
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>= 60 years
- Diagnosed with an advanced lung cancer: unresectable stage IIIA, IIIB, or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
- Intent to receive treatment from the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUCCC) Thoracic Oncology Clinic
- A score of 2 or higher on the three functional items of the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ5D5L) patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment
- Patients are eligible at any time point during their treatment here at Ohio State University (OSU). Rationale for this timeframe is due to the overwhelming nature of the first few visits and uncertainty around an eventual treatment plan. Patients at any stage of their treatment can participate and benefit from a physical therapy and psychosocial intervention. Patients will be approached at their initial visit but the investigators can also offer enrollment at any one of the patients regularly scheduled clinic visits or via phone or email
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign an informed consent document (or indicate approval or disapproval by another means)
You may not qualify if:
- Prisoners are excluded from participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Carolyn Presley
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carolyn J Presley, MD
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2022
First Posted
April 21, 2022
Study Start
April 14, 2022
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share