NCT05296252

Brief Summary

This study assesses the impact of mind-wandering on reading and math.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 11, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

January 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Investigator Developed Items Derived From Reading Content Being Taught

    Participants will answer multiple choice questions regarding the reading material being taught, and the key index will the raw score number correct. The investigators call the scale "Sleep and Dreams" (after the content the participant is reading about), and the possible score range will be 0 (min) to 24 (max), with higher scores meaning better comprehension of the material.

    administered one time immediately following the single reading learning session on day 1

  • Investigator Developed Items Derived From Math Content Being Taught

    Participants will answer multiple choice questions regarding the math material being taught, and the key index will the raw score number correct. The investigators call the scale "Circles" (after the content being taught), and the possible score range will be 0 (min) to 24 (max), with higher scores meaning better comprehension of the material.

    adminstered one time immediately following the single math learning session on day 1

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Investigator Developed Probe-Caught Mind-Wandering

    On 12 occasions interspersed during each of the math and reading learning sessions, on day 1 only.

Study Arms (2)

Mind Wandering Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

75% of participants will receive proactive and reactive mind-wandering information and redirection.

Behavioral: mind-wandering intervention

Mind Wandering Comparison

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

25% of participants will receive only mind-wandering redirection, but only at random times.

Behavioral: mind-wandering comparison

Interventions

Participants in this condition receive a brief introduction to the potential impact of mind-wandering (before learning, proactive), and are redirected to lesson if "probe-caught" mind-wandering are endorsed (during learning, reactive)

Mind Wandering Intervention

Participants in this condition receive no introduction, and only redirection, and the redirection is random, not in reaction to mind-wandering

Mind Wandering Comparison

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • enrollment in schools where we have permission to conduct the study

You may not qualify if:

  • students known to be enrolled in separate curricula (e.g., life-skills classes)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Houston

Houston, Texas, 77204-5053, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Paul T. Cirino, PhD

    University of Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
There is no need, and it is not possible to blind condition
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: The factors are study condition order (reading, math), proactive and reactive mind-wandering manipulation (yes, no), and lesson target (reading, math, both, neither)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2022

First Posted

March 25, 2022

Study Start

May 11, 2022

Primary Completion

June 15, 2022

Study Completion

June 15, 2022

Last Updated

May 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

If another researcher with an approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol wishes to utilize the data for purposes that are non-overlapping with the investigators, they may reach out to the Study PI, who can share de-identified individual data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Data will become available after the paper describing the study is published in a peer-reviewed Journal, and will be available for up to 5 years following the termination of the study
Access Criteria
If another researcher with an approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol wishes to utilize the data for purposes that are non-overlapping with the investigators, they may reach out to the Study PI, who can share de-identified individual data.

Locations