Oculomotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Using Visual Feedback in Stroke Patients
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Equipment Based on Visual Feedback Technology (Eye Tracking) in Patients Who Have Suffered a Cerebral Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators will test the effectiveness of oculomotor cognitive training using eye tracker-based device during rehabilitation course in patients with a degree of disability no more than 3 points on a scale Rankin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2024
CompletedApril 4, 2022
March 1, 2022
11 months
March 15, 2022
March 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Consciousness Test
It is necessary to monitor the emerging stimuli (red circles) and keep eyes in the center of each of them. The quantitative indicator of visual attention as a percentage will be measured.
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Cognitive function scale: memory scale
Diagnostics of memory functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Cognitive function scale: language scale
Diagnostics of language functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Cognitive function scale: visual-spatial scale
Diagnostics of visual-spatial functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Cognitive function scale: communicative scale
Diagnostics of communicative functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Cognitive function scale: thinking skills scale
Diagnostics of thinking skills functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Assessment of a neuropsychologist
Screening for cognitive impairment: MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), the results vary between 0 and 30 points. A score of 26 points or more is considered the norm. The lower the score, the worse the result
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Assessment of a neuropsychologist
Qualitative assessment of neuropsychological examination data (Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery)
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Training on eye tracker based device
EXPERIMENTALPatients will undergo a primary diagnostics of cognitive functions (memory, thinking skills, language, visual-spatial and communicative functions) and an diagnostics of the visual attention index on an eye tracker-based device. Based on the results of the diagnosis, participants will be offered a scheme of correctional training and secondary diagnostics at the end of training. Correctional training on an eye tracker-based device consists, firstly, of a 10-minute exercise at the beginning of each lesson aimed at improving visual functions and attention. Patients had to follow a spontaneously moving object. Secondly, correctional training includes a block of neurorehabilitation (simple cognitive exercises similar to the tasks presented in the assessment).
Training with a neuropsychologist
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo primary and secondary diagnostics on an eye tracker-based device, then participants will have a conventional correctional training with a neuropsychologist according to an individual correction plan.
Training on eye tracker based device and with a neuropsychologist
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo primary and secondary diagnostics and correctional training on an eye tracker-based device, in the same time participants will have a conventional correctional training with a neuropsychologist according to an individual correction plan.
Interventions
The intervention is based on the principle of visual biofeedback. The patient sees where his gaze is and can objectively assess and correct his visual error.
The intervention is based on classical neuropsychological techniques aimed at correcting oculomotor disorders and improving visual attention (blank, psychometric, etc.)
This is combination of the first and second interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- signed consent
- at least 3 points on the Rankin scale;
- the presence of disorders of the visual-oculomotor system, visual attention;
- understanding and following instructions; stable vegetative and hemodynamic parameters;
- on the MOOCA scale \>22;
- patients should be fully examined for the underlying and concomitant disease (examination by a neurologist, ophthalmologist, physiotherapist);
You may not qualify if:
- , 5 points on the Rankin scale;
- unstable hemodynamics;
- time after stroke is less than 2 weeks;
- presence of epileptic activity;
- serious ophthalmological disorders (for example, partial atrophy of the optic nerve);
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency
Moscow, 117513, Russia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marina Shurupova, Ph.D.
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2022
First Posted
April 4, 2022
Study Start
January 10, 2022
Primary Completion
December 20, 2022
Study Completion
December 20, 2024
Last Updated
April 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share