Preliminary Study on the Development and Reliability and Validity of Attention Rating Scale
1 other identifier
observational
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study, based on preliminary experimental results, literature review, and expert consultations, developed the Attentional Rating Scale (ARS). The aim was to rapidly assess participants' attention and potential influencing factors. The research focused on the scale's reliability and validity among healthy adults. Additionally, the Attention Network Test (ANT) served as the gold standard for evaluating attention. The study attempted to identify correlations between various dimensions of attention and the three attentional networks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFebruary 28, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.3 years
October 10, 2023
February 26, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Developing Attention Rating Scale(ARS)
The Attention Assessment Scale is developing as a tool to assess attention ability designed for self-rating scale. Its purpose is to swiftly evaluate the attention levels of adults. There are 30 items in ARS. The minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 5, and the higher scores mean a better outcome for attention ability.
3 months
Reliability and Validity of the Attention Assessment Scale.
Reliability 1. Cronbach α of ARS should be above 0.8 that means good reliability. 2. The intra group correlation value for retesting reliability should be above 0.8 that means good retesting reliability. Validity 1. The split half reliability measured and factor analysis to test constuctive validity of ARS. 2. The correlation coefficient r with ANT and the correlation coefficient r with THAT should be statistic significant, that means good validity of attention ability for Attention Assessment Scale.
2 years
Study Arms (4)
Major Depressive Disorder
Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) according to DSM-5.
Chronic Insomnia Disorder
Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for Chronic Insomnia Disorder according to ICSD-3.
Health Control
Healthy population.
Attention Deficit and hyperactivity Disorder
Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for Attention Deficit and hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) according to DSM-5.
Interventions
rating scales, test ANT
Eligibility Criteria
Sixty cases of patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), ADHD and insomnia disorder separately are recruited from outpatient clinics and hospital wards. Additionally, sixty healthy individuals are recruited from the community as control subjects.
You may qualify if:
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosed according to DSM-5, or Chronic Insomnia Disorder diagnosed according to ICSD-3
- Ages between 18 and 60 years old
- Right-handed
- Educational level ≥5 years or IQ ≥90, capable of understanding and reading Chinese.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently diagnosed with any other DSM-5 mental disorders (according to MINI 7.0) or ICSD-3 sleep-wake disorders, apart from MDD, ADHD or insomnia disorder
- Currently and past history of neurological disorders and physical illnesses with subjectives
- Consumed alcohol in the week preceding the enrollment
- Using antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, or other central nervous system-acting drugs for at least 4 weeks in the current episode
- Undergoing any physical treatments such as ECT, neuromodulation therapy or Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment in the past 6 months
- Refused to sign the informed consent form
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xueqin Wang, doctor
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2023
First Posted
January 16, 2024
Study Start
September 28, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
February 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share