Effectiveness of the Apprenti en Action School-based Culinary Program on 9-10-year-old Children's Food Literacy
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In New Brunswick, Canada, only 53% of Kindergarten to Grade 5 students reported eating five or more vegetables and fruits per day in 2016-2017. Low intakes of vegetables and fruits are a marker for poor nutrition, which may impair the growth and cognitive development of children and adolescents and may put them at risk of developing certain non-communicable diseases earlier in life. It has been suggested that increasing children's food literacy may be an effective way of promoting healthier diets, including increasing vegetable and fruit intake among students. Since children spend most of their waking hours at school, this may be a key setting for promoting food literacy and healthy eating behaviors. Previous studies have found that culinary interventions that include taste testing and nutrition education may improve students' food literacy and vegetable and fruit consumption. Therefore, this quasi-experimental study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a school-based culinary program titled "Apprenti en Action" on primary school children's food literacy, breakfast, and vegetable and fruit consumption. Specifically, data were collected among Grade 5 students from ten francophone elementary schools, five of which received the "Apprenti en Action" program and five who did not. The "Apprenti en Action" program consisted of six, one-hour culinary workshops given once a week, at school, during school hours. Data on students' food literacy, breakfast, vegetable, and fruit consumption were collected via online questionnaires before and after the program. In addition to collecting quantitative data, qualitative data were collected from program participants and their parents to assess their perceptions of "Apprenti en Action".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedOctober 17, 2022
October 1, 2022
4 months
March 3, 2022
October 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline in vegetable and fruit consumption at the end of the program
Students' consumption of vegetables and fruits was measured using two questions from the provincial New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey (New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey, 2016). These questions asked how many vegetables and fruits they had eaten the day before the survey. This was measured using a scale from 0 (None), to 7 (7 or more).
Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)
Change from baseline in breakfast consumption at the end of the program
Students' breakfast consumption was assessed based on one question from the provincial New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey (New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey, 2016). Students were asked to report how often they ate breakfast during the last school week. This question was scored from 0 (none) to 7 (7 days of the week).
Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)
Change from baseline in cooking skills at the end of the program
Cooking skills include all skills needed to prepare and cook foods, including cooking methods and food preparation techniques, and were measured using 18 questions. Among the questions, one was assessed with a five-point, downwards Likert-type scale (e.g. "Rate your ability to make the different breakfast foods"), and 17 questions were multiple-choice questions (e.g. "How long does it take to cook hard- and soft-boiled eggs?"). All cooking skills included in the questionnaire were skills that children were expected to have practiced during the program. The questionnaire was based on three previously-validated tools (Skeaff et al. 2020, Dean et al. 2021, Lavelle et al. 2017). Specifically, these questions measured children's ability to prepare breakfast, to use various cooking methods, to use kitchen equipment, to apply food safety practices, and to use various food preparation techniques. In total, a score ranging from 0 to 83 points was possible for this outcome variable.
Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)
Change from baseline in nutrition knowledge at the end of the program
Nine multiple-choice questions were used to assess children's nutrition knowledge, including their understanding of a balanced plate and food safety. These questions were inspired by those used in Skeaff et al.'s (2020) validated questionnaire. In total, a score of 0 to 9 points was possible for this outcome variable.
Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)
Change from baseline in food skills at the end of the program
Food skills represent the knowledge and skills required to choose and prepare food according to available resources and to cook balanced meals. They include meal planning, following a recipe, using leftovers, making and following a grocery list, reading nutrition labels, etc. Of the three questions used to measure food skills, two questions were multiple-choice questions (e.g. "The above picture is of French toast. What are three ingredients you need for French toast?") and one was a five-point downwards Likert-type scale ("From this list, indicate how good you are at performing these actions."). These questions were based on previously-validated questionnaires (Skeaff et al. 2020, Lavelle et al. 2017). In total, a score of 0 to 53 points was possible for this outcome variable.
Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Student perception of the program
One week after the end of the program (Week 7)
Parent perception of the program
One week after the end of the program (Week 7)
Study Arms (2)
Apprenti en Action (intervention group)
"Apprenti en Action" consists of six, one-hour culinary workshops offered once a week during school hours.
Control group
Students in the control group do not receive the "Apprenti en Action" program.
Interventions
The "Apprenti en Action" program aims to teach students how to read and follow recipes, prepare and cook various foods using various culinary techniques, and apply food safety practices. Students are also taught the basics of healthy food, nutrition, and cooking.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants are Grade 5 students enrolled in one of the 10 recruited francophone elementary schools in the province of New Brunswick, Canada.
You may qualify if:
- Be enrolled in a Grade 5 or mixed Grade 4 and 5 class
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universite de Monctonlead
- New Brunswick Innovation Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Universite de Moncton
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
Related Publications (16)
Lavelle F, McGowan L, Hollywood L, Surgenor D, McCloat A, Mooney E, Caraher M, Raats M, Dean M. The development and validation of measures to assess cooking skills and food skills. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 2;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0575-y.
PMID: 28865452BACKGROUNDDean M, Issartel J, Benson T, McCloat A, Mooney E, McKernan C, Dunne L, Brennan SF, Moore SE, McCarthy D, Woodside JV, Lavelle F. CooC11 and CooC7: the development and validation of age appropriate children's perceived cooking competence measures. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 30;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01089-9.
PMID: 33516243BACKGROUNDMiller LM, Cassady DL. The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature. Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 27.
PMID: 26025086BACKGROUNDBrown, J. (2019). Nutrition through the life cycle (7e ed.). Cengage Learning.
BACKGROUNDConseil de la santé du Nouveau-Brunswick. (2017). Sondage sur le mieux-être des élèves du Nouveau-Brunswick au niveau primaire de la maternelle à la 5e année (2016-2017) (p. 19). https://csnb.ca/sites/default/files/publications-attachments/sondage-mieux-etre-des-eleves-au-primaire-2016-2017-fr.pdf
BACKGROUNDDudley DA, Cotton WG, Peralta LR. Teaching approaches and strategies that promote healthy eating in primary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 25;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0182-8.
PMID: 25889098BACKGROUNDEvans CE, Christian MS, Cleghorn CL, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):889-901. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030270. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PMID: 22952187BACKGROUNDSkeaff, S., Govan, A., & Skeaff, M. (2020). A Practical Kitchen-Based Validation of the Food Skills Section of a Food Literacy Questionnaire for 9-10 Year Old Children.
BACKGROUNDMaynard M, Gunnell D, Ness AR, Abraham L, Bates CJ, Blane D. What influences diet in early old age? Prospective and cross-sectional analyses of the Boyd Orr cohort. Eur J Public Health. 2006 Jun;16(3):316-24. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki167. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
PMID: 16141299BACKGROUNDNathan N, Wolfenden L, Butler M, Bell AC, Wyse R, Campbell E, Milat AJ, Wiggers J. Vegetable and fruit breaks in Australian primary schools: prevalence, attitudes, barriers and implementation strategies. Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;26(4):722-31. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr033. Epub 2011 May 13.
PMID: 21571836BACKGROUNDNeumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Larson NI, Eisenberg ME, Loth K. Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jul;111(7):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.012.
PMID: 21703378BACKGROUNDWang Y, Bentley ME, Zhai F, Popkin BM. Tracking of dietary intake patterns of Chinese from childhood to adolescence over a six-year follow-up period. J Nutr. 2002 Mar;132(3):430-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.3.430.
PMID: 11880567BACKGROUNDKrebs-Smith SM, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Subar AF, Kessler R, Pivonka E. Psychosocial factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):98-104. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.98.
PMID: 10160052BACKGROUNDKarpouzis F, Lindberg R, Walsh A, Shah S, Abbott G, Lai J, Berner A, Ball K. Evaluating OzHarvest's primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10302-0.
PMID: 34022839BACKGROUNDHarris G, Mason S. Are There Sensitive Periods for Food Acceptance in Infancy? Curr Nutr Rep. 2017;6(2):190-196. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0203-0. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
PMID: 28596932BACKGROUNDBaranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Marsh T, Islam N, Zakeri I, Honess-Morreale L, deMoor C. Squire's Quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00570-6.
PMID: 12554024BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie A Ward, PhD, RD
Universite de Moncton
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2022
First Posted
March 14, 2022
Study Start
March 15, 2022
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
October 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10