Examining the Role of Perceived Body Boundaries and Spatial Frame of Reference in the Effect of a Mindfulness Meditation in Emotional Eating
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emotional eating, or overeating in response to emotions, is problematic because of its link to weight gain, obesity, and psychopathology such as bulimia and binge eating disorder. To date, a vast amount of research has studied the psychological processes that cause individuals to overeat in response to emotions in an effort to develop ways to help individuals reduce their emotional eating. The aim of the current project is to study two psychological processes that can potentially be positively influenced to improve well-being: perceived body boundaries and a person's spatial frame of reference. Particularly, the investigators will examine how perceived body boundaries and spatial frames of reference can be positively influenced through a body scan meditation and thereby improve emotional eating. Perceived body boundaries refers to the continuum along which the self is experienced, from a body-encapsulated entity that is separate from the surrounding world to a more diffuse entity that is more connected with others and the environment. Spatial frames of reference describes the region within one's perception, often based in the body and construed as the self, that may be experienced as egocentric, through a preoccupation with internal events, or as allocentric, with feelings of unity and interdependence with others and the environment. One way for individuals to experience more diffuse body boundaries and allocentric frames of reference is through a body scan meditation. In this practice, individuals are instructed to intentionally shift their attention to various parts of the body and to notice what happens without judging or reacting. Thoughts and emotions are briefly noted if they arise, and attention is shifted back to the body. Recent research has shown that when individuals practice the body scan meditation, individuals are likely to experience greater positive emotions, lower negative emotions, lower ruminations, and higher psychological wellbeing. In addition, research has shown that individuals are able to experience more diffuse perceived body boundaries and more allocentric frames of reference through a body scan meditation. Based on this work, the researchers predict that when emotional eaters practice the body scan meditation, emotional eaters will experience more diffuse body boundaries, more allocentric frames of reference, and lower ruminations, which could in turn reduce their negative affect and food cravings. The researchers will test this hypothesis by asking emotional eaters to complete questionnaires that measure perceived body boundaries, spatial frames of reference, ruminations, negative emotions, and food cravings before and after a body scan meditation. To ensure that any changes in these measures are due to the meditation, the researchers will compare these findings with emotional eaters who complete the same measures before and after a control listening task. The findings of the current study will be used to recommend the body scan meditation to support emotional eaters in regulating their emotions, cravings, and eating behaviors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2022
CompletedAugust 26, 2022
August 1, 2022
3 months
December 16, 2021
August 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Negative affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale
Negative affect will be measured using the negative affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. The lowest score is 10, and the highest score is 50. The higher outcome would mean a worse outcome as this indicates higher negative affect, and a lower score would indicate a better outcome (lower negative affect).
The investigators are assessing change from baseline (immediately after the mood induction) to immediately after the intervention.
Desire subscale of the Food Cravings Questionnaire-State Version
The intensity of food cravings will be measured using the Desire subscale of Food Cravings Questionnaire- State Version. Three items that target cravings for food from the Desire subscale of Food Cravings Questionnaire- State Version will be used in the current study. Specifically, participants rate the three items: "I am craving tasty food", "I have an urge for tasty food", "I have an intense desire to eat tasty food." All items will be rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The mean score on the three items will be used as the food craving measure.
The investigators are assessing change from baseline (immediately after the mood induction) to immediately after the intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Perceived Body Boundaries Scale
The investigators are assessing change from baseline (immediately after the mood induction) to immediately after the intervention
Spatial Frame of Reference Continuum
Immediately after the mood induction and immediately after the intervention
Brief State Rumination Inventory
Immediately after the mood induction and immediately after the intervention
Other Outcomes (5)
Adherence Checks
Immediately after the intervention
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness- 2
Up to 2 days before testing
Equanimity Scale
Up to 2 days before testing
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Body Scan Meditation
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental condition involves participants listening to a 16-minute recording of a body scan meditation. The body scan condition guides participants to focus on their bodily sensations separately, then together as a whole.
Listening Task
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active comparer condition involves participants listening to a 16-minute recording of text that describes the human musculoskeletal system. The text will be narrated by a female voice to match the body scan meditation. In addition, the focus on the body in the text of the active condition matches the focus on the body in the body scan meditation and, as such, controls for demand characteristics.
Interventions
Our intervention will involve two meditation exercises. 1) the experimental condition (body scan meditation). 2) the active comparator condition (listening task)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals who self-report as emotional eaters, indicated by a score of 3.25 or higher on the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ; Van Strien et al., 1986)
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported eating disorders
- Self-reported psychiatric conditions
- More than 10 hours of formal meditation practice (e.g., sitting meditation) or retreat experience in the last one year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G4, Canada
Related Publications (29)
Annesi JJ, Johnson PH, Tennant GA, Porter KJ, Mcewen KL. Weight Loss and the Prevention of Weight Regain: Evaluation of a Treatment Model of Exercise Self-Regulation Generalizing to Controlled Eating. Perm J. 2016 Summer;20(3):15-146. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-146. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
PMID: 26901268BACKGROUNDRicca V, Castellini G, Fioravanti G, Lo Sauro C, Rotella F, Ravaldi C, Lazzeretti L, Faravelli C. Emotional eating in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;53(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.04.062. Epub 2011 May 26.
PMID: 21620387BACKGROUNDFarb NA, Segal ZV, Mayberg H, Bean J, McKeon D, Fatima Z, Anderson AK. Attending to the present: mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-22. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm030.
PMID: 18985137BACKGROUNDDambrun M. When the dissolution of perceived body boundaries elicits happiness: The effect of selflessness induced by a body scan meditation. Conscious Cogn. 2016 Nov;46:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PMID: 27684609BACKGROUNDChristoff K, Cosmelli D, Legrand D, Thompson E. Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;15(3):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
PMID: 21288760BACKGROUNDHanley M, Khairat M, Taylor K, Wilson R, Cole-Fletcher R, Riby DM. Classroom displays-Attraction or distraction? Evidence of impact on attention and learning from children with and without autism. Dev Psychol. 2017 Jul;53(7):1265-1275. doi: 10.1037/dev0000271. Epub 2017 May 4.
PMID: 28471220BACKGROUNDForman EM, Shaw JA, Goetter EM, Herbert JD, Park JA, Yuen EK. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing acceptance and commitment therapy and standard cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety and depression. Behav Ther. 2012 Dec;43(4):801-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PMID: 23046782BACKGROUNDDesbordes G, Gard T, Hoge EA, Holzel BK, Kerr C, Lazar SW, Olendzki A, Vago DR. Moving beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Research. Mindfulness (N Y). 2014 Jan 21;2014(January):356-72. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8.
PMID: 25750687BACKGROUNDCrosswell AD, Moreno PI, Raposa EB, Motivala SJ, Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Bower JE. Effects of mindfulness training on emotional and physiologic recovery from induced negative affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Dec;86:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
PMID: 28923751BACKGROUNDForman EM, Herbert JD, Moitra E, Yeomans PD, Geller PA. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. Behav Modif. 2007 Nov;31(6):772-99. doi: 10.1177/0145445507302202.
PMID: 17932235BACKGROUNDSevinc G, Holzel BK, Hashmi J, Greenberg J, McCallister A, Treadway M, Schneider ML, Dusek JA, Carmody J, Lazar SW. Common and Dissociable Neural Activity After Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Relaxation Response Programs. Psychosom Med. 2018 Jun;80(5):439-451. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000590.
PMID: 29642115BACKGROUNDPrice CJ, Hooven C. Interoceptive Awareness Skills for Emotion Regulation: Theory and Approach of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT). Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00798. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29892247BACKGROUNDGallagher I I. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5.
PMID: 10637618BACKGROUNDJhangiani R, Tarry H, Stangor C. Principles of social psychology; 1st international edition.
BACKGROUNDDeng Y-Q, Li S, Tang Y-Y. The relationship between wandering mind, depression and mindfulness. Mindfulness 2014;5(2):124-128.
BACKGROUNDHanley AW, Dambrun M, Garland EL. Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Self-Transcendent States: Perceived Body Boundaries and Spatial Frames of Reference. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020 May;11(5):1194-1203. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01330-9. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
PMID: 33747250BACKGROUNDAustin JH. Zen-brain reflections. MIT press; 2010.
BACKGROUNDYaden DB, Haidt J, Hood RW, Vago DR, Newberg, AB. The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology. 2017;21(2):143-160.
BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn, Jon. Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life. Hachette Books; 1994:104.
BACKGROUNDGendall KA, Joyce PR, Sullivan PF. Impact of definition on prevalence of food cravings in a random sample of young women. Appetite. 1997 Feb;28(1):63-72. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0060.
PMID: 9134095BACKGROUNDDambrun M, Berniard A, Didelot T, Chaulet M, Sylvie DV, Corman M, Juneau C, Lea MM. Unified consciousness and the effect of body scan meditation on happiness: alteration of inner-body experience and feeling of harmony as central processes. Mindfulness. 2019;10(8):1530-1544.
BACKGROUNDDahl CJ, Lutz A, Davidson RJ. Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep;19(9):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PMID: 26231761BACKGROUNDAlberts HJ, Mulkens S, Smeets M, Thewissen R. Coping with food cravings. Investigating the potential of a mindfulness-based intervention. Appetite. 2010 Aug;55(1):160-3. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.044. Epub 2010 May 21.
PMID: 20493913BACKGROUNDAlberts HJ, Thewissen R, Raes L. Dealing with problematic eating behaviour. The effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on eating behaviour, food cravings, dichotomous thinking and body image concern. Appetite. 2012 Jun;58(3):847-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PMID: 22265753BACKGROUNDNg HH, Wu CW, Huang FY, Cheng YT, Guu SF, Huang CM, Hsu CF, Chao YP, Jung TP, Chuang CH. Mindfulness Training Associated With Resting-State Electroencephalograms Dynamics in Novice Practitioners via Mindful Breathing and Body-Scan. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:748584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748584. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34777144BACKGROUNDFrayn M, Knäuper B. Emotional eating and weight in adults. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. 2018; 37(4):924-933.
BACKGROUNDHanley AW, Garland EL. Spatial frame of reference as a phenomenological feature of self-transcendence: Measurement and manipulation through mindfulness meditation. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2019; 6(4): 329-345.
BACKGROUNDSauer-Zavala SE, Walsh EC, Eisenlohr-Moul TA, Lykins, EB. Comparing mindfulness-based intervention strategies: Differential effects of sitting meditation, body scan, and mindful yoga. Mindfulness. 2013; 4(4): 383-388.
BACKGROUNDJames W. The self. The self in social interaction. 1968;141-49.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huma Shireen, MA, MPsy
McGill University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental condition, a body scan meditation, or a control condition, a listening task, using a random digit generator. This randomization will be done in a way that is blinded from the participants to ensure that knowledge of the practice to which they are assigned does not impact how they respond to the self-report questionnaires. In addition, the researcher guiding the mood induction will also remain blind to the participant allocation.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- James McGill Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2021
First Posted
February 3, 2022
Study Start
December 9, 2021
Primary Completion
March 18, 2022
Study Completion
March 18, 2022
Last Updated
August 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share