State Representation in Early Psychosis
STEP
2 other identifiers
observational
277
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine state representation in individuals aged 15-45 who have been diagnosed with a psychotic illness, as well as young adults who do not have a psychiatric diagnosis. State Representation is our ability to process information about our surroundings. Participants will complete computerized tasks that measure state representation while having their brain activity measured.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 29, 2025
CompletedSeptember 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.7 years
January 24, 2022
September 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in Performance of Dot Pattern Expectancy (DPX) Task Variant
The DPX task variant consists of a series of pattern sequences. One pattern is designated the "A" cue, and another the "X" cue, which requires one response (AX, 60-70% of trials, e.g. respond with the left button), while other sequences require a different response (AY or BX, 12-15% of trials each, or BY, 6-10% of trials, e.g. respond with the right button). Given the strong expectation that X's evokes a valid response, BX trials place demands on the fidelity (stability, memory) of the "B" cue state representation to overcome this tendency. Performance is assessed based on accuracy and response time.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Performance of Bandit Task Variant
This is a task variant that uses choice options (neutral images) that are rewarded probabilistically. The rewarded stimulus with the highest reward is changed over time. State learning associated with staying or switching stimuli too quickly (lose-switching) can be evaluated. Performance is based on accuracy, response time, and behavior of reward seeking.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Global Cognition Z Score.
The investigators will examine global cognition scores from the Test My Brain neurocognitive battery. Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased cognitive functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in EEG Variables
Analysis will examine variables including phase synchrony, slope of the spectral power density (indexing E-I balance), and prefrontal/parietal theta as a measure of perceptual noise.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in MRI Variables
MRI assessments will include structural MRI, Diffusion-weighted MRI, Resting State fMRI.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by Minnesota Symptom Severity Scale
Baseline,6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SANS/SAPS
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the BPRS
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SPQ-BR
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SGI
Baseline, 6 month follow up
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Early Psychosis participants
Individuals who have been diagnosed with a psychosis spectrum illness, such as schizophrenia, and are in the early stages of the disease (i.e., aged 15-35, or if 36-45, has had the onset of psychotic symptoms within the last 5 years)
Healthy Controls
Demographically matched participants who do not have a personal or immediate family history of psychosis spectrum illnesses.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants are recruited from Minnesota. Most participants are located in the Twin Cities Metro area.
You may qualify if:
- English proficiency, as determined by staff observation and participant self-report
- Estimated IQ at or above 70, as estimated by the cognitive assessments
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, psychosis NOS, bipolar disorder with psychosis, or major depressive disorder with psychosis; those aged 36-45 years old must have had with onset of psychotic symptoms within the previous 5 years
- Achieved clinical stability, defined as outpatient status for at least one month prior to study participation
You may not qualify if:
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- The participant is unable to demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the consenting study staff member, to make a choice about participating in the research study
- Participant is pregnant
- Participant is illiterate
- Cannot pass the CMRR Subject Safety Screen due to MRI contraindications
- Presence of a major neurological disorder (psychosis participants may have an autism spectrum diagnosis)
- Previous clinically significant head injury or prolonged unconsciousness, as determined by the PI/Co-Is
- Meets criteria for substance or alcohol dependence within 3 months of enrollment
- The presence of any major medical condition that, in the opinion of the PI/Co-Is, would impede participation in the study or would put the participant at additional risk by participating
- Presence of severe alcohol or substance abuse
- Has participated in significant formal cognitive training programs, as determined by the PI/Co-Is
- Meets criteria for clinical risk of suicidal behavior, as defined by:
- Clinician judgement
- A suicide attempt within 6 months of enrollment
- Active suicidal ideation at screening or baseline, as indicated by the C-SSRS
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sophia Vinogradov, MD
University of Minnesota
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angus MacDonald III, Ph.D.
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Department Head
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2022
First Posted
March 10, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 29, 2025
Study Completion
August 29, 2025
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- The data will become available 12 months after the completion of this study.
- Access Criteria
- Access will be provided to users who have an account with the NIMH Data Archive and who request permission through a Data Access Request.
This data is shared with the NIMH Data Archive, Collection ID C3504, and will include demographics, imaging data, and primary and secondary outcome data.