NCT05270226

Brief Summary

Adults with Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience poor occupational performance at work compare to adults without ADHD, manifested at tendencies toward unemployment, job instability, work accidents, and sickness absences. This poor occupational performance at work may be partly caused by difficulties at executive functions (EF) abilities, and at the ability to set and attain goal directed work-activities at a satisfactory manner. Therefore, improvement at those abilities may followed by occupational performance at work enhancement of adults with ADHD. Such improvement may enhance adults with ADHD quality of life. Despite the wide-ranging implications of poor occupational performance at work of adults with ADHD, treatments which focus at this component improvement among adults with ADHD are lack. The Metacognitive ADHD Telehealth intervention for Work-performance Enhancement (Work-MATE) is an innovative program that aim to improve occupational performance at work of adults with ADHD, by enhancing their EF abilities, self-awareness, and personal strategy use. This program was established based on existing fundamental models and approach, (1) The World Health Organization's international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) (WHO, 2001), (2) Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance model (Baum, Christiansen, \& Bass-Haugen, 2015) (3) The Dynamic Interactional Model of cognition (DIM; Toglia, 2018) and the Multicontex approach (Toglia, 2018) which based on the it, and (4) Telehealth as service-delivering model. The Work-MATE aim to promote self-awareness and self-generation of personal strategies and increase efficiency strategy use across meaningful purposeful everyday work activities (i.e., goal directed work-activities). It is a short, synchronous and hybrid teleintervention program of eleven 1-hour weekly individual sessions, focused directly on occupational performance at work enhancement of adults with ADHD.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2022

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Work PerformanceOccupational PerformanceExecutive FunctionsQuality of LifeOrganization in Time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from Baseline Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) at 3 and 6 months

    COPM used to evaluate self-perception of occupational performance at work. During semi-structured interview at the third session of intervention, the participant was asked to identify two meaningful activities for which he perceived the greatest performance problems during work, or activities that influence his occupational performance at work. Those two activities were set up as the two intervention goals. Participants rated each activity for performance from 1 (not able to do at all) to 10 (able to do extremely well) and similarly for satisfaction with performance. Significant improvement was considered as a change of at least two points between measures.

    Measure 1 (baseline; at third intervention meeting), measure 2 (after intervention completion; approximately 3 months from baseline), measure 3 (approximately 6 months from baseline)

  • Change from Baseline Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult version (BRIEF-A) at 3 and 6 months

    BRIEF-A measure EF abilities following the intervention. The score includes a global executive composite (GEC) index that represents the overall EF score, composed of a behavioral regulation index (BRI) score and a metacognition index (MI) score with nine nonoverlapping score scales. Scores of 65 or more for each index or scale indicate a clinical deficit.

    Measure 1 (baseline; 1 week before the beginning of the intervention), measure 2 (after the intervention completion; approximately 3 months from baseline), measure 3 (approximately 6 months from baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) at 3 and 6 months

    Measure 1 (baseline; 1 week before the beginning of the intervention), measure 2 (after the intervention completion; approximately 3 months from baseline), measure 3 (approximately 6 months from baseline)

  • Change from Baseline Time Organization and Participation Scale (TOPS) at 3 and 6 months

    Measure 1 (baseline; 1 week before the beginning of the intervention), measure 2 (after the intervention completion; approximately 3 months from baseline), measure 3 (approximately 6 months from baseline)

  • Change from Baseline Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales (BADDS) at 3 and 6 months

    Measure 1 (baseline; 1 week before the beginning of the intervention), measure 2 (after the intervention completion; approximately 3 months from baseline), measure 3 (approximately 6 months from baseline)

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

After being randomly allocated, group A participants had first evaluation (out of 3, pre-intervention) and immidiatlly recived Metacognitive ADHD Telehealth intervention for Work-performance Enhancement (Work-MATE).

Behavioral: The Metacognitive ADHD Telehealth intervention for Work-performance Enhancement (Work-MATE)

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

After being randomly allocated, group B participants had first evaluation (out of 4), then waiting-phase of 10-11 weeks, and after second evaluation (pre-intervention) start Work-MATE intervention process.

Behavioral: The Metacognitive ADHD Telehealth intervention for Work-performance Enhancement (Work-MATE)

Interventions

The Metacognitive ADHD Telehealth intervention for Work-performance Enhancement (Work-MATE) is an innovative program that aim to improve occupational performance at work of adults with ADHD, by enhancing their EF abilities, self-awareness, and personal strategy use. The Work-MATE is a short, synchronous and hybrid teleintervention program of eleven 1-hour weekly individual sessions. It offers a written standardized protocol, which include uniform structure of each intervention session and pool of therapy aids (for self-tailored matching by occupational therapists).

Group AGroup B

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants worked at least 3 months at the same workplace.
  • Participants had formal medical diagnosis of ADHD.
  • Symptoms consistent with ADHD were confirmed either by the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) version 1.1 (Kessler et al., 2005) final score or by medium-to-high probability of ADHD according to the BADDS (Brown, 2012).
  • Participants had at least one EF deficit according to the BRIEF-A (Roth et al., 2005).
  • Participants not receiving any functional additional treatment during the study period.
  • Participants read and write Hebrew fluently.

You may not qualify if:

  • People who self-reported comorbid mental health disorders, motor or neurological disabilities, chronic diseases, or significant injuries.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Haifa

Haifa, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Sara Rosenblum, Prof.

    University of Haifa

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Participants were randomly assigned to Intervention Group A or B. Randomization sequence was created using permuted block design manually, with a 1:2 allocation, using block size of 6. The result of the randomization was blinded for participants and occupational therapists (OTs) who preformatted the intervention processes. Participants had not contact with other participants during all study phases. To address potential bias, all study assessments completed online, without involvement of the OTs who preformatted the intervention processes. The OTs and the participants were not exposed to baseline assessment scores or post-intervention scores of any study measure.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The study was designed as a randomized controlled and crossover trial to evaluate the evaluate the effect of the Work-MATE program on occupational performance at work of adults with ADHD. The first Intervention Group (A) received the Work-MATE intervention. After a crossover switching trial, the second Intervention Group (B) received the Work-MATE intervention in order. All evaluations were online, in similar environmental conditions. The Ethics Committee of the University of Haifa approved the study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in the Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2022

First Posted

March 8, 2022

Study Start

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 31, 2019

Study Completion

February 21, 2020

Last Updated

March 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations