NCT03104972

Brief Summary

The possibility of influencing brain activity and steadily enhancing behavioral performance through external intervention has long fascinated neuroscientists. One of these techniques, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), has received great interest. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in the current research includes two types of stimulation: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). The tES techniques involve the application of constant weak direct current (e.g. 1-2 mA) to the brain via skin-electrode interface, creating electric field that modulates neuronal activity. The safety profile of tES is excellent. Despite effective pharmacotherapy for ADHD there is a need for improvement of cognitive dysfunction and behavioral symptoms that are only inadequately covered by pharmacological or psycho-social interventions. Since ADHD is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood with significant negative lifetime outcomes, non-invasive brain stimulation methods have been investigated in childhood and adolescents neuropsychiatric disorders showing promising results. If tES is significantly effective for certain symptoms of ADHD, it may offer many advantages as a therapy. Treatment of ADHD with non-invasive brain stimulation has recently been reviewed in the medical literature, concluding that this technique seems to have efficacy in ADHD, however, standardized study protocols are needed to determine it. In this study we intend to further examine the efficacy of tDCS and tRNS for children with ADHD and its effect on ADHD symptoms, memory, executive functions, in a randomized controlled crossover study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2017

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2017

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2018

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 31, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 29, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

ADHDTRANS CRANIAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) parameters

    Assessment before and after intervention

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV)

    4 weeks

  • Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

    4 weeks

  • MOXO-Continuous Performance Test standardized attention test

    4 weeks

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Resting state Electroencephalography (EEG)

    4 weeks

  • CGI-S Scale = Clinical Global Impression - Severity

    4 weeks

Study Arms (3)

tDCS - placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

tDCS-placebo (sham) group to receive either transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) or matching placebo (sham( during 5 following days (one session each day). After a one week break, there will be a crossover between the control group and the sham group: those we received tDCS in the 1st week will get sham, while those who received sham in the 1st week will received tDCS at the 3rd week.

Device: tDCSDevice: sham

tRNS - placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

trans cranial random stimulation (tRNS)-sham group, who will receive the same type of intervention with the same intervals as above but with tRNS instead of tDCS.

Device: tRNSDevice: sham

tDCS-tRNS

EXPERIMENTAL

tDCS-tRNS group. Here the same intervention as above will be provided with the same intervals, but real tDCS and real tRNS will be provided in a counterbalanced fashion. This would allow to compare the different treatment in a within-subject design, as well as to compare the effect of those to sham stimulation in the first two groups in a between-subject design.

Device: tDCSDevice: tRNS

Interventions

tDCSDEVICE

Stimulation would be applied using semi-dry 5X5 cm electrodes. The current would be 0.75mA, which based on previous computational modeling of tDCS in children and is estimated to equal that of 1-1.5 mA in adults. This decision was made after considering the parameters that would influence current distribution and density at the site of stimulation such as thinner scalp, less cerebrospinal fluid, and smaller head size of the paediatric population. A similar dosage using tDCS was well tolerated by children, and was not associated with adverse effects29. The anodal electrode will be positioned above the dlPFC (F3 based on the International 10-20 system, while the cathodal electrode would be placed over the right supraorbital.

tDCS - placebotDCS-tRNS
tRNSDEVICE

Children in the active tRNS group will received 0.75mA of tRNS (100-640Hz) to their left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) via semi-dry 5cm X 5cm electrodes, attached under designated electrode positions (F3, F8) of a tES cap that followed the International 10-20 system (InnoSphere Inc., Haifa). The left dlPFC and right IFG were chosen, based on their contribution in executive control and inhibition. tRNS will be applied for 20 minutes per session during an iPad cognitive training. Similar duration has also been used in paediatrics using tDCS29. Similar to a previous tRNS study in children, and the rational provided for tDCS we will apply 0.75mA.

tDCS-tRNStRNS - placebo
shamDEVICE

For sham-tRNS we will use the same montage as in active tRNS. For sham-tDCS we will use the same montage as in active tDCS. The only difference between active and sham tES would be that in the case of the sham tES the 30 sec of ramp up of the current from 0 to 0.75mA would not be followed by 19 min of stimulation at 0.75mA as in active tES, but would immediately be followed by 30 sec ramp down period to 0mA. Such method has been shown to provide effective blindness of the stimulation condition as both active and sham tES would lead to slight itching sensation that would disappear due scalp habitation. No further stimulation would be provided in the sham group during the daily session.

tDCS - placebotRNS - placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Meet ADHD criteria according to the DSM-5
  • Meet ADHD criteria according to "gold standard" AAP criteria = semi-structured interview, medical/neurological examination
  • Score above the standard clinical cut off values for ADHD symptoms on ADHD-RS
  • Drug naïve. -

You may not qualify if:

  • Chronic neurological disease
  • Epilepsy in subject or first degree relative
  • Intellectual disability
  • Any other chronic conditions
  • Chronic use of medications
  • Other primary psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., depression, anxiety, psychosis) -

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Computerized Neurotherapy Lab, School of OT, Hebrew University

Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 91240, Israel

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Berger I, Dakwar-Kawar O, Grossman ES, Nahum M, Cohen Kadosh R. Scaffolding the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder brain using transcranial direct current and random noise stimulation: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Mar;132(3):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

    PMID: 33561725BACKGROUND
  • Dakwar-Kawar O, Berger I, Barzilay S, Grossman ES, Cohen Kadosh R, Nahum M. Examining the Effect of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Cognitive Training on Processing Speed in Pediatric Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 27;16:791478. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.791478. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35966992BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: 'tDCS-tRNS' arm: a randomized controlled crossover study. 'tRNS-Sham' arm: a randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Computerized Neurotherapy Lab

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2017

First Posted

April 7, 2017

Study Start

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 30, 2021

Study Completion

January 30, 2022

Last Updated

October 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Available IPD Datasets

similar protocol Access

Locations