HFAC Stimulation (30-50 Kilohertz) in Healthy Volunteers (High Frequency Alternating Current Stimulation)
HFA
Effectiveness and Safety of Electrical Stimulation With Alternating High-frequency Currents (30-50 Kilohertz) on the Sensorimotor System in Healthy Volunteer Subjects
3 other identifiers
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High-frequency alternating current (HFAC) stimulation (between 1 kilohertz (kHz) and 100 kHz) on the peripheral nerve has been shown in basic animal research to produce a rapidly reversible nerve block without nerve damage. In human studies, frequencies between 1 kHz and 30 kHz had been applied (both transcutaneously and percutaneously), showing rapidly reversible sensorimotor changes after stimulation without adverse effects. However, the effect of currents with a frequency higher than 30 kHz, which has been shown to be more effective in eliciting nerve block in primates, has not been investigated in humans. The main objective of this study is to investigate the safety of the intervention and the effect in healthy volunteers of transcutaneous application of alternating currents with frequencies between 30 kHz and 50 kHz on neurophysiological changes in the nerve (nerve conduction velocity and antidromic sensory action potentials (SNAPs), sensory (pain to pressure, epicritic sensitivity and thermal pain to heat) and motor (maximal isometric force) components of the median nerve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 25, 2022
CompletedMay 16, 2022
May 1, 2022
7 months
January 14, 2022
May 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pressure pain threshold
It will be assessed as an indirect measure of the blockade of the Aδ sensory fibers of the median nerve. Once the applicator is placed perpendicular to the skin, over an uncomfortable spot on the palmar aspect of the non-dominant hand, the pressure shall be increased at a rate of approximately 5 N/s. Three measurements shall be taken with an interval between measurements of 15 seconds, the average of the three measurements shall be taken as the pressure pain threshold.
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Compound antidromic sensitive nerve action potentials
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
Maximal isometric pinch strength
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
Two points discrimination threshold
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
Heat pain threshold
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
Skin temperature
Baseline, during intervention at 10 minutes, post immediate at 15 minutes and 15 minutes post intervention.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Demographic characteristics
Pre intervention (baseline 0min)
Study Arms (4)
30 kilohertz
EXPERIMENTALAlternating current stimulation at 30 kilohertz via transcutaneous, 15 minutes each intervention with a maximum intensity of 400 milliamperes (mA).
40 kilohertz
EXPERIMENTALAlternating current stimulation at 40 kilohertz via transcutaneous, 15 minutes each intervention with a maximum intensity of 400 milliamperes (mA).
50 kilohertz
EXPERIMENTALAlternating current stimulation at 50 kilohertz via transcutaneous, 15 minutes each intervention with a maximum intensity of 400 milliamperes (mA).
Sham stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORSham stimulation via transcutaneous, 15 minutes each intervention, following the same procedures as 30, 40 and 50kHz HFAC groups.
Interventions
For electrical stimulation in the active groups, unmodulated alternating currents with a symmetrical rectangular waveform of 30 kHz, 40 kHz and 50 kHz will be applied. The current intensity shall be adjusted individually for each participant by increasing the current intensity until the participant reports a "strong but comfortable tingling" sensation just below the excitomotor threshold on the palmar aspect of the hand in the dermatomes innervated by the median nerve. The intensity of the current shall be adjusted every two minutes if the tingling sensation decreases. This protocol has been used in previous studies conducted by our research group
Sham electrical stimulation will be performed with the same equipment and electrodes as in the active groups without the participants and the evaluator having a view of the device screen. The intensity of the current will be increased for 30 seconds until the sensory threshold ("strong but comfortable tingling sensation") is exceeded and once the threshold is reached, the intensity will be reduced to 0 mA with 30 seconds ramp down. Participants will not receive electrical current during the rest of the placebo intervention. This protocol was used in other studies with similar interventions to blind participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy volunteer participants.
- Ability to perform all clinical tests and understand the study protocol, as well as obtain informed consent.
- Tolerance to the application of electrotherapy.
You may not qualify if:
- Having been treated with an electric current similar to the one applied prior to the intervention.
- Neurological pathology of peripheral or central origin.
- Altered sensitivity in the area of application of the intervention.
- No compromise of continuity.
- History of neuromuscular disease.
- Epilepsy.
- Trauma, surgery or pain affecting the upper limb.
- Diabetes.
- History of cancer.
- Cardiovascular, metabolic or immunological diseases.
- Presence of pacemaker or any other implanted electrical device.
- Taking medication during the study and in the 7 days prior to the study.
- Consumption of narcotic substances during the study and in the 7 days prior to the study.
- Presence of tattoos or any other external agent introduced in the area of treatment and treatment and assessment area (hand).
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Castilla-La Mancha University
Toledo, 45071, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Megia Garcia A, Serrano-Munoz D, Bravo-Esteban E, Ando Lafuente S, Avendano-Coy J, Gomez-Soriano J. [Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with fibromyalgia: A systematic review]. Aten Primaria. 2019 Aug-Sep;51(7):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Spanish.
PMID: 30029964BACKGROUNDSerrano-Munoz D, Avendano-Coy J, Simon-Martinez C, Taylor J, Gomez-Soriano J. 20-kHz alternating current stimulation: effects on motor and somatosensory thresholds. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Feb 19;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00661-x.
PMID: 32075666BACKGROUNDSerrano-Munoz D, Avendano-Coy J, Simon-Martinez C, Taylor J, Gomez-Soriano J. Effect of high-frequency alternating current transcutaneous stimulation over muscle strength: a controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 12;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0443-2.
PMID: 30419966BACKGROUNDFernandez-Perez JJ, Serrano-Munoz D, Gomez-Soriano J, Alvarez DM, Avendano-Coy J. Selective nociceptive modulation using a novel prototype of transcutaneous kilohertz high-frequency alternating current stimulation: a crossover double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Nov 15;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01503-w.
PMID: 39548560DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan Avendaño-Coy, PhD
University of Castilla-La Mancha
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Julio Gómez-Soriano, PhD
University of Castilla-La Mancha
- STUDY CHAIR
Diego Serrano-Muñoz, PhD
University of Castilla-La Mancha
- STUDY CHAIR
Juan José Fernández-Pérez, PhD student
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of participants and evaluator shall be performed using the same equipment, electrodes, cables, and placement for the actual or placebo treatments. In addition, the participants and the evaluator will not have a view of the equipment screen. Blinding of the outcome assessor will be performed using different team members for randomization of the interventions (Investigator 1), intervention (Investigator 2), evaluation (Investigator 3) and statistical analysis (Investigator 4). Randomization will be kept hidden from participants and research team members in sealed envelopes and only the researcher who will deliver the intervention (researcher 2) will know the group assignment. Successful blinding of participants and evaluator will be analyzed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2022
First Posted
February 9, 2022
Study Start
February 10, 2022
Primary Completion
September 20, 2022
Study Completion
December 25, 2022
Last Updated
May 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- 1 month following article publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent ethical committee identified for this purpose. This data will be shared only for individual participant data meta-analysis. The proposal should be directed to juan.avendano@uclm.es. The investigator will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be available for 5 years.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, figures, images and appendix)