Unmodulated 5 Kilohertz Currents Versus TENS: Effect on Pain Thresholds, Tactile Threshold, and Nerve Conduction
Unmodulated 5 Kilohertz Alternating Currents Versus TENS: Effect on Mechanical and Thermal Pain Thresholds, Tactile Threshold, and Peripheral Nerve Conduction in Humans.
1 other identifier
interventional
38
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the transcutaneous application of unmodulated 5 Kilohertz (KHz) alternating currents are effective in decreasing the thermal and mechanical experimental pain and cause changes in peripheral nerve conduction. Moreover evidence whether the effect and comfort of this current is greater than Conventional TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) commonly used for the treatment of clinical pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 31, 2017
CompletedJuly 31, 2017
July 1, 2017
2 months
November 18, 2014
December 21, 2016
July 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Mechanical Pain Threshold During Treatment
The pressure pain threshold will be measured by a pressure algometer and will be expressed in Newton
during treatment at 15 min
Thermal Pain Threshold During Treatment
The heat pain threshold will be measured by a computer controlled thermo-foil heating device and will be expressed in ºC
during treatment at 15 min.
Nerve Conduction Latency Immediately After Treatment
The compound action potential latencies will be measured and will be expressed in ms.
immediately after treatment at 20 min.
Tactile Threshold During Treatment
The tactile threshold will be measured with Von Frey filaments and will be expressed in millinewton
during treatment at 15 min.
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Habituation to Electrical Stimulation
Start treatment session (1 min), end treatment session (20 min)
Perception Current Comfortability
At the end of the third experimental session, 3 days
Change Current Density (mA/cm2)
at 1 min. treatment session, at 20 min. treatment session
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Amplitude ( µV)
Baseline,immediately after treatment at 20 min..
Baseline Mechanical Pain Threshold
Baseline at 0 min.
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Skin Temperature
Baseline, during treatment at 15 min., immediately after treatment at 20 min., at 20 min. post-treatment, at 40 min. post-treatment
Study Arms (3)
5 KHz
EXPERIMENTALTranscutaneous application of 5 KHz current over the course of the superficial radial nerve in the right forearm for a 20 minutes session. The intensity of the current will increase until participants report a "strong but comfortable" sensation, just below motor threshold.
TENS
EXPERIMENTALTranscutaneous application of Conventional TENS current over the course of the superficial radial nerve in the right forearm for a 20 minutes session. The intensity of the current will increase until participants report a "strong but comfortable" sensation, just below motor threshold. Currents parameters are frequency 110 Hz and pulse width 200 microseconds
Sham Stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORElectrodes are placed over the course of the superficial radial nerve in the right forearm for a 20 minutes in the same manner as experimental groups, but will be applied a sham electrical stimulation increasing the current intensity of an unconnected channel.
Interventions
5 KHz transcutaneous electrical stimulation over superficial radial nerve through the electrotherapy device Myomed 932. (Enraf-Nonius, Delft, Netherlands)
TENS transcutaneous electrical stimulation over superficial radial nerve through the electrotherapy device Myomed 932. (Enraf-Nonius, Delft, Netherlands)
Sham transcutaneous electrical stimulation over superficial radial nerve through the electrotherapy device Myomed 932. (Enraf-Nonius, Delft, Netherlands)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants will be volunteer healthy students of Physiotherapy, University of Castilla - La Mancha, older than 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Epilepsy.
- Trauma, surgery or pain affecting the upper limb, shoulder girdle or cervical area.
- Osteosynthesis material in the upper limb.
- Diabetes.
- Cancer.
- Cardiovascular disease.
- Pacemaker or other implanted electrical device.
- Take any drug (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, antidepressants, analgesics, antiepileptics, ...) during the study and in the previous 7 days.
- Presence of tattoos or other external agent introduced into the treatment or assessment area.
- Pregnancy.
- Sensitivity disturbance in upper limb.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Avendano-Coy J, Gomez-Soriano J, Goicoechea-Garcia C, Basco-Lopez JA, Taylor J. Effect of Unmodulated 5-kHz Alternating Currents Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Mechanical and Thermal Pain, Tactile Threshold, and Peripheral Nerve Conduction: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):888-895. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
PMID: 28017706DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Juan Avendaño Coy
- Organization
- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan Avendaño-Coy, MsC
University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2014
First Posted
December 19, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 31, 2017
Results First Posted
July 31, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07