NCT05222711

Brief Summary

All calls that end up on the out-of-hours general practitioners' service (OHGPS), which contain a demand for an urgent home visit, are passed on to the on-call general practitioner (GP). These calls are randomized into two arms: after the patient's informed consent, they are assigned either to one arm where the monitoring device, PICO, is applied together with the GP's general care or to the other arm where only the usual care is provided. All data such as suspected diagnosis, treatment or referral, influence of the parameters, ECG and/or alarms on the management and the user-friendliness are recorded. After 30 days, the diagnosis and evolution is requested from the patient's own GP or, if referred to a hospital, in the hospital in order to be able to compare the effect of the approach by the GP between both arms. The aim is to investigate if 1/ the use of the PICO monitoring device could improve GPs' decisions to refer to hospital or not in urgent cases; 2/ there is a difference between the diagnosis with and without the use of the monitoring device using the final diagnosis by the electronic health record of the own GP of the patient; 3/ the call to send a GP for an emergency contained sufficient information for the OHGPS phone operator to take an appropriate decision; 4/ the build-in alarms help the GP during his intervention; 5/ the PICO is easy to use during an emergency; 6/ the use of the device makes them feel more confident in transmitting the information to the Medical Emergency Team.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
866

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 24, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

general practionermonitoring devicevital parametersECGout-of-hours careRCTFamily practice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The number of correct referred participants in the intervention arm is a minimum of 11% higher than the correct referred participants in the usual care arm.

    A correct referral is defined as follows: a patient referred to hospital staying more than 12 hours in the hospital; a patient referred only for a diagnostic test, e.g. an X-Ray, an ECG, a blood test, advice of a consultant, and no hospitalisation followed; a patient referred to his own GP was not hospitalised within 72 hours for the same reason. The aim of the study is to investigate the percentage of correct referrals in both arms and to determine if the percentage in the intervention arm is 11% or more higher than in the usual care arm.

    30 days after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The rate of correct diagnosis in the intervention arm is a minimum of 11% higher than the rate of correct diagnosis in the usual care arm.

    30 days after intervention

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Do the reasons for encounter in the message from the OGHPS telephone operator to the on-call GP correspond to the severity of the condition (urgent versus non-urgent) as determined by the on-call GP at the patient's location

    until study completion, at 6 months

  • Do the PICO(TM) alarms set for SpO2 assist the GP when the upper or lower limit is exceeded in whether or not to refer the patient to a hospital?

    until study completion, at 6 months

  • Do the PICO(TM) alarms set for the heart rate assist the GP when the upper or lower limit is exceeded in whether or not to refer the patient to a hospital?

    until study completion, at 6 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Monitor used

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The device is applied and the GP provides usual care.

Device: Use of the PICO(TM) monitoring device

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care is provided by the GP.

Interventions

The aim is to record if the outcome (referral or not) is influenced by the results of the parameters and/or the ECG.

Monitor used

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • From the calls at the 112-1733 dispatch sent to the OHGPS dispatch centre, those for whom the decision by the OHGPS dispatcher is to send a GP for an urgent home visit.
  • All GPs on duty and chauffeurs of the OHGPS in Belgium, present during the study period are recruited after signing an ICF. GPs' age, gender and years of practice will be recorded.
  • All patients 18 years and older, for whom a home visit is requested, seen by a participating GP and if the informed consent form is signed either by the patient or by the legal representative, either onsite or at a later time.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Patients not seen during home visits,
  • Patients failed to provide informed consent
  • Patients with an acute trauma but not in a possible life-threatening situation (e.g. a broken bone)
  • Victims found lying on the street
  • Patients seen after the intervention of an ambulance, a Primary Intervention Team (PIT) or a Medical Emergency Team (MET)
  • Patients refusing to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CatholicULeuven

Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Van den Bruel A, Thompson M, Buntinx F, Mant D. Clinicians' gut feeling about serious infections in children: observational study. BMJ. 2012 Sep 25;345:e6144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6144.

    PMID: 23015034BACKGROUND
  • Schols AMR, Dinant GJ, Hopstaken R, Price CP, Kusters R, Cals JWL. International definition of a point-of-care test in family practice: a modified e-Delphi procedure. Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):475-480. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx134.

    PMID: 29385437BACKGROUND
  • Dalbak LG, Straand J, Melbye H. Should pulse oximetry be included in GPs' assessment of patients with obstructive lung disease? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):305-10. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1117283. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

    PMID: 26654760BACKGROUND
  • Renier W, Geelen M, Steverlynck L, Wauters J, Aertgeerts B, Verbakel J, Vanbrabant P, Gillet JB, Sabbe M, Buntinx F. Can the heartscan be used for diagnosis and monitoring of emergencies in general practice? Acta Cardiol. 2012 Oct;67(5):525-31. doi: 10.1080/ac.67.5.2174126.

    PMID: 23252002BACKGROUND
  • Zicari AM, Marzo G, Rugiano A, Celani C, Carbone MP, Tecco S, Duse M. Habitual snoring and atopic state: correlations with respiratory function and teeth occlusion. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Nov 7;12:175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-175.

    PMID: 23134563BACKGROUND
  • Sieber A, L'Abbate A, Kuch B, Wagner M, Benassi A, Passera M, Bedini R. Advanced instrumentation for research in diving and hyperbaric medicine. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;37(5):259-69.

    PMID: 20929183BACKGROUND
  • Park MH, de Asmundis C, Chierchia GB, Sarkozy A, Benatar A, Brugada P. First experience of monitoring with cardiac event recorder electrocardiography Omron system in childhood population for sporadic, potentially arrhythmia-related symptoms. Europace. 2011 Sep;13(9):1335-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur159. Epub 2011 May 26.

    PMID: 21616943BACKGROUND
  • Hochstadt A, Chorin E, Viskin S, Schwartz AL, Lubman N, Rosso R. Continuous heart rate monitoring for automatic detection of atrial fibrillation with novel bio-sensing technology. J Electrocardiol. 2019 Jan-Feb;52:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.096. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

    PMID: 30476634BACKGROUND
  • Flynn D, Francis R, Robalino S, Lally J, Snooks H, Rodgers H, McClelland G, Ford GA, Price C. A review of enhanced paramedic roles during and after hospital handover of stroke, myocardial infarction and trauma patients. BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0118-5.

    PMID: 28228127BACKGROUND
  • Byrne AJ, Jones JG. Responses to simulated anaesthetic emergencies by anaesthetists with different durations of clinical experience. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):553-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.553.

    PMID: 9175971BACKGROUND
  • Hansen MB, Lippert FK, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen AM. Systematic downloading and analysis of data from automated external defibrillators used in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1681-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.038. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

    PMID: 25281188BACKGROUND
  • Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.

    PMID: 24047204BACKGROUND
  • Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.

    PMID: 19564179BACKGROUND
  • Bagnasco A, Costa A, Catania G, Zanini M, Ghirotto L, Timmins F, Sasso L. Improving the quality of communication during handover in a Paediatric Emergency Department: a qualitative pilot study. J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Sep 30;60(3):E219-E225. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.3.1042. eCollection 2019 Sep.

    PMID: 31650057BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

EmergenciesHeart FailurePulmonary EmbolismAsthmaAcute Coronary SyndromeAtrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterHyperventilationPneumoniaPneumothoraxHeart ArrestPulmonary EdemaArrhythmias, Cardiac

Interventions

Monitoring, Physiologic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolismEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesBronchial DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesMyocardial IschemiaRespiration DisordersSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsPleural Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Jan Y Verbakel, MD, PhD

    ACHG

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Walter S Renier, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Jan Y Verbakel, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Open label
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2021

First Posted

February 3, 2022

Study Start

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

data available upon reasonable request

Locations