NCT05218382

Brief Summary

Title: A randomized study on use of virtual reality technology for pain relief in transvaginal oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation Objectives: The study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in pain relief during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (TUGOR) under conscious sedation Hypothesis to be tested: VR can reduce the pain level during TUGOR. Design and subjects: This is a randomized study on additional use of VR during TUGOR. A total of 160 women undergoing oocyte retrieval on both ovaries will be recruited and randomized to one of the following groups: active and placebo groups. Those with known allergy to pethidine, diazepam or local anaesthetics; and history of claustrophobia/ susceptible to motion sickness will be excluded. Instruments: Immersive VR Interventions: All received women will receive the standard conscious sedation with 25mg IV pethidine and 5mg IV diazepam; and paracervical block of 10ml 1% lignocaine. VR headset will be put on for every woman. It will only be switched on for the active VR group but not the placebo VR group. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the maximal abdominal pain levels during TUGOR measured by a 100mm linear visual analogue scale prior. Secondary outcome measures include the pain of vaginal puncture and the abdominal pain four hours after the procedure prior to discharge from hospital. Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analysed on intention to treat basis and per protocol. Demographic features of the study groups will be compared. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables. Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the continuous variables between groups. P values of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

VRIVFoocyte retrievalpain levels

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain levels

    maximal pain level during oocyte retrieval experienced by the participants measured by visual analog scale from 0-100 (maximum); higher levels mean mean painful

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • level of unpleasantness

    Day 0

  • client satisfaction questionnaire score

    Day 0

  • Ongoing pregnancy rate

    10 weeks

Study Arms (2)

VR group

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants will have the the virtual reality headset with immersive virtual reality.

Device: Virtual reality

Placeob group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The participants will have the virtual reality headset put on but blank screen.

Device: No virtual reality

Interventions

immersive virtual reality technology

VR group

Virtual reality with blank screen

Placeob group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 42 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsInfertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • \- women aged \> 18 years and \<43 years
  • understand Chinese
  • undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval on both sides

You may not qualify if:

  • Had known allergy to pethidine, diazepam or local anaesthetics
  • Had oocyte retrieval performed on one ovary only
  • History of claustrophobia/ susceptible to motion sickness

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Ng EH, Miao B, Ho PC. A randomized double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte retrieval. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Jan;20(1):8-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1021202604049.

  • Ng EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. Comparison of two different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte collection in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 2000 Oct;15(10):2148-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2148.

  • Ng EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. A prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of paracervical block in the pain relief during egg collection in IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2783-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2783.

  • Kwan I, Wang R, Pearce E, Bhattacharya S. Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 15;5(5):CD004829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub4.

  • Lai SF, Lam MT, Li HWR, Ng EHY. A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 May;40(5):653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

  • Roest I, Buisman ETIA, van der Steeg JW, Koks CAM. Different methods of pain relief for IVF and ICSI oocyte retrieval - A Dutch survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Jun 15;4:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100065. eCollection 2019 Oct.

  • Dunn J, Yeo E, Moghaddampour P, Chau B, Humbert S. Virtual and augmented reality in the treatment of phantom limb pain: A literature review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(4):595-601. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171447.

  • Indovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.

  • Mallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.

  • Ahmad M, Bani Mohammad E, Anshasi HA. Virtual Reality Technology for Pain and Anxiety Management among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Dec;21(6):601-607. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 May 15.

  • Deo N, Khan KS, Mak J, Allotey J, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Fusari G, Benn J. Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16377. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

  • Wang YL, Gao HX, Wang JS, Wang JH, Bo L, Zhang TT, Dai YL, Gao LL, Liu Q, Zhang JJ, Cai JM, Yu JQ, Li YX. Immersive virtual reality as analgesia for women during hysterosalpingography: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4023-y.

  • Ng CSM, Tong PYW, Wong E, Cheng HHY, Ko JKY, Li RHW, Ng EHY. Randomized controlled study on the use of virtual reality for pain relief in oocyte retrieval under transvaginal ultrasound guidance using paracervical block and conscious sedation. Hum Reprod. 2025 Dec 1;40(12):2310-2317. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf188.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

InfertilityPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ernest HY Ng, MD

    The University of Hong Kong

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinding of the participants is not possible due to the nature of the intervention.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled superiority trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2021

First Posted

February 1, 2022

Study Start

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2023

Study Completion

February 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

No similar studies in this area

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will become available upon publication of the study and be available for 10 years.
Access Criteria
any reasonable request

Locations