Pain Relief Using VR in Oocyte Retreival
A Randomized Study on Use of Virtual Reality Technology for Pain Relief in Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval Under Conscious Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Title: A randomized study on use of virtual reality technology for pain relief in transvaginal oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation Objectives: The study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in pain relief during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (TUGOR) under conscious sedation Hypothesis to be tested: VR can reduce the pain level during TUGOR. Design and subjects: This is a randomized study on additional use of VR during TUGOR. A total of 160 women undergoing oocyte retrieval on both ovaries will be recruited and randomized to one of the following groups: active and placebo groups. Those with known allergy to pethidine, diazepam or local anaesthetics; and history of claustrophobia/ susceptible to motion sickness will be excluded. Instruments: Immersive VR Interventions: All received women will receive the standard conscious sedation with 25mg IV pethidine and 5mg IV diazepam; and paracervical block of 10ml 1% lignocaine. VR headset will be put on for every woman. It will only be switched on for the active VR group but not the placebo VR group. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the maximal abdominal pain levels during TUGOR measured by a 100mm linear visual analogue scale prior. Secondary outcome measures include the pain of vaginal puncture and the abdominal pain four hours after the procedure prior to discharge from hospital. Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analysed on intention to treat basis and per protocol. Demographic features of the study groups will be compared. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables. Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the continuous variables between groups. P values of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
10 months
December 18, 2021
May 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain levels
maximal pain level during oocyte retrieval experienced by the participants measured by visual analog scale from 0-100 (maximum); higher levels mean mean painful
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (3)
level of unpleasantness
Day 0
client satisfaction questionnaire score
Day 0
Ongoing pregnancy rate
10 weeks
Study Arms (2)
VR group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants will have the the virtual reality headset with immersive virtual reality.
Placeob group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe participants will have the virtual reality headset put on but blank screen.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- women aged \> 18 years and \<43 years
- understand Chinese
- undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval on both sides
You may not qualify if:
- Had known allergy to pethidine, diazepam or local anaesthetics
- Had oocyte retrieval performed on one ovary only
- History of claustrophobia/ susceptible to motion sickness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Related Publications (13)
Ng EH, Miao B, Ho PC. A randomized double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte retrieval. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Jan;20(1):8-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1021202604049.
PMID: 12645862RESULTNg EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. Comparison of two different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte collection in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 2000 Oct;15(10):2148-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2148.
PMID: 11006189RESULTNg EH, Tang OS, Chui DK, Ho PC. A prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of paracervical block in the pain relief during egg collection in IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2783-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2783.
PMID: 10548622RESULTKwan I, Wang R, Pearce E, Bhattacharya S. Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 15;5(5):CD004829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub4.
PMID: 29761478RESULTLai SF, Lam MT, Li HWR, Ng EHY. A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 May;40(5):653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
PMID: 32299734RESULTRoest I, Buisman ETIA, van der Steeg JW, Koks CAM. Different methods of pain relief for IVF and ICSI oocyte retrieval - A Dutch survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Jun 15;4:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100065. eCollection 2019 Oct.
PMID: 31517299RESULTDunn J, Yeo E, Moghaddampour P, Chau B, Humbert S. Virtual and augmented reality in the treatment of phantom limb pain: A literature review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(4):595-601. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171447.
PMID: 28211829RESULTIndovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.
PMID: 29485536RESULTMallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31308733RESULTAhmad M, Bani Mohammad E, Anshasi HA. Virtual Reality Technology for Pain and Anxiety Management among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Dec;21(6):601-607. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 May 15.
PMID: 32423641RESULTDeo N, Khan KS, Mak J, Allotey J, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Fusari G, Benn J. Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16377. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
PMID: 32575151RESULTWang YL, Gao HX, Wang JS, Wang JH, Bo L, Zhang TT, Dai YL, Gao LL, Liu Q, Zhang JJ, Cai JM, Yu JQ, Li YX. Immersive virtual reality as analgesia for women during hysterosalpingography: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4023-y.
PMID: 31959220RESULTNg CSM, Tong PYW, Wong E, Cheng HHY, Ko JKY, Li RHW, Ng EHY. Randomized controlled study on the use of virtual reality for pain relief in oocyte retrieval under transvaginal ultrasound guidance using paracervical block and conscious sedation. Hum Reprod. 2025 Dec 1;40(12):2310-2317. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf188.
PMID: 40974211DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ernest HY Ng, MD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of the participants is not possible due to the nature of the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2021
First Posted
February 1, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will become available upon publication of the study and be available for 10 years.
- Access Criteria
- any reasonable request
No similar studies in this area