Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse
hystropexy
Abdominal Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse: a Randomized Controlled Study
hystropexy
Abdominal Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse: a Randomized Controlled Study
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse: a Randomized Controlled Study .Aim of This Study is to Compare Between Using Poly-proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Abdominal Sacrohysteropexy Repairing Apical Prolapse Stage 2 or More. Outcome Measures: Short Term: investigators Will Evaluate Operative Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay Duration, Occurrence of Major Complications, Episodes of Constipation, Urinary Retention and Urinary Tract Infection. Long Term (After 1 year): investigators Will Evaluate Occurrence of Relapse as Well as Late Complications. Local Symptoms, Quality of Life and Sexual Function Will be Evaluated by a Questioner Before and After Surgery
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 1, 2019
Actual (reported)November 1, 2020
Actual (reported)November 26, 2021
Actual (reported)December 1, 2021
Actual (reported)January 19, 2022
Actual (reported)operative time
time taken from start of operation till its end
60 minutes
blood loss
amount in CC
during surgery time
occurrence of major complications as vascular injury or ureteric injury
injury
during surgery
urinary retention
inability to pass urine after catheter removal
24 hours
hospital stay duration
how many hours patient stay in hospital after procedure till discharge
24 hours
occurrence of relapse
1year after procedure
erosion
1 year after procedure
Group 1: patients with apical prolapse who will do Sacro hysteropexy using mersilene tape (polyester 5mm tape with double needle)
Group 2: patients with apical prolapse who will do Sacro hysteropexy using poly-proline mesh
comparison between standard poly prolene mesh and the poly ester mersilene tape in Sacro hysteropexy surgical procedure
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Menoufia University
Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia, 32951, Egypt
80 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
November 26, 2021
First Posted
January 19, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Actual (reported)Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinofixation Surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
January 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: