Evolution of Symptoms After Sacrospinofixation With Posterior Isthmic Band
SPIP
Prospective Study of the Evolution of Symptoms After Sacrospinofixation With Posterior Isthmic Band
SPIP
Prospective Study of the Evolution of Symptoms After Sacrospinofixation With Posterior Isthmic Band
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
OTHER · ID-RCB
observational
33
1 country
1
Study Start
September 2, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Prolapse is a condition that can cause disabling pelvic, urinary or sexual function disorders and impaired quality of life. Regarding the prolapse of the middle floor, the vaginal sacrospinofixation according to Richter is the reference technique for the suspension of the vaginal fundus. But the technique of sacrospinofixation vaginally is not without several difficulties in the short term but also in the medium and long term. Recently, anchoring devices have been developed to limit the dissection of the sacrospinous ligament and the operative exposure by the sometimes traumatic valves. The investigating team uses a technical variant in the form of an isthmic posterior strip of light weight and whose arms are sutured to the sacrospinous ligaments. The advantages of this isthmic strip are based on its small size, its very low basis weight and its wide mesh (improvement of tolerance) via a mini-invasive vaginal approach (thus allowing ambulatory care). Patient functional discomfort is the main problem related to the presence of a prolapse, therefore, the researchers wish to evaluate patient feelings following the use of this isthmic band. The researchers' hypothesis is that the sacrospinofixation technique with posterior isthmic band Bilateral Sacrospinous Colposuspension (BSC) Mesh (Agency for Medical Innovations (AMI) laboratory) improves symptoms experienced by patients with mid-level prolapse.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)April 11, 2019
Actual (reported)September 2, 2019
Actual (reported)November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Improvement of symptoms
Percentage of patients with improvement of their symptoms on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Index (PGI-I) scale (score 1, 2, or 3)
6 weeks postoperatively
Patients with apical symptomatic prolapse ≥ II in the POP-Q classification and for whom sacrospinofixation with posterior isthmic BSC Mesh is planned
Improvement of symptoms on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Index (PGI-I) scale (score 1, 2, or 3) at 6 weeks postoperatively
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Patients with apical symptomatic prolapse ≥ II in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification and for whom sacrospinofixation with posterior isthmic Bilateral Sacrospinous Colposuspension (BSC) Mesh is planned
Service de gynecologie Hôpital Femme mère enfant
Bron, 69500, France
Gautier CHENE, Ph.D.
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
33 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 10, 2019
First Posted
April 11, 2019
Study Start
September 2, 2019
Actual (reported)Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinofixation Surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Last Updated
January 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-01
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: