Apical Prolapse
7
2
2
2
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Treatment Research
9 treatments under study, led by Pectouteropexy
Research Leaders
8 sponsors active, led by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 40/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 7 trials
100.0%
+13.4% vs benchmark
14%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 2 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.6%
Based on 2 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Evaluation of the Use of Synthetic Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Evolution of Symptoms After Sacrospinofixation With Posterior Isthmic Band
Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse
Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinofixation Surgery
RCT for SSLF vs. ISFF With Conventional Surgical Instruments in Chinese Apical Prolapse Female Patients
Posterior Approach for Pectouteropexy
Research Network
Common Treatments
- Pectouteropexy1
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy1
- Dynamic Pelvic Floor Mri1
- Native Tissue Repair Procedures With Conventional Surgical Instruments1
- Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Beside Sutures1
Active Sponsors
- Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital1
- Brno University Hospital1
- Ain Shams University1
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon1
- University Hospital, Lille1
Top Investigators
Professor of Urology Department of Urology Ain Shams University
Hangzhou Women's and Children's Hospital
Shan'xi Province Women's and Children's Hospital
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Suzhou City Hospital
Related Conditions
- Sacrocolpopexy1
- Sacrospinofixation1
- Glue Fixation1