RCT for SSLF vs. ISFF With Conventional Surgical Instruments in Chinese Apical Prolapse Female Patients
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs. Ischial Spine Fasicia Fixation With Conventional Surgical Instruments in Chinese Apical Prolapse Female Patients: a Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
320
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of two native tissue repair procedure with conventional surgical instruments in Chinese apical prolapse female patients (POP-Q II-IV) and compare the outcome in prolapse women randomized to Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and Ischial spinous fascia fixation (ISFF).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 2, 2020
December 1, 2019
3 years
December 25, 2019
December 27, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
rate of surgical success
definition for surgical success is symptomatic prolapse below grade II occurred at 3 months after operation, and the severest indication point in POP-Q evaluation was taken as the criterion. No vaginal swelling sensation, that is answer "no" for PFDI-20 Questionnaire Question 3, "Do you often see or feel vaginal tumors come out?". The patient's self-perception symptoms is improved or improved significantly, that is answer 1 or 2 for the PGI-C questionnaire. There is no need of further treatment for prolapse, such as reoperation or pessary.
up to 36 months after operation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
rate of Postoperative recurrence
from 3 months after operation up to 36 months after operation
visual analogue scales
up to 36 months after operation, usuallly within 3 days after operation
changes between preoperative and postoperative symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PFIQ-7)
up to 36 months after operation
changes between preoperative and postoperative symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PFDI-20)
up to 36 months after operation
changes between preoperative and postoperative symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PISQ-12)
up to 36 months after operation
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SSLF-CSI
ACTIVE COMPARATORnative tissue repair procedure with conventional surgical instruments in Chinese apical prolapse female patients randomized to Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) .
ISFF-CSI
ACTIVE COMPARATORnative tissue repair procedure with conventional surgical instruments in Chinese apical prolapse female patients randomized to Ischial spinous fascia fixation (ISFF)
Interventions
Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF): treatment for apical prolapse with vaginal fornix suspended to sacrospinous ligament; Ischial spinous fascia fixation (ISFF): treatment for apical prolapse with vaginal fornix suspended to ischial spinous fascia (ISFF).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with apical prolapse with POP-Q II-IV (but no anterior wall prolapse stage IV)
- SSLF or ISFF is proceeded as described before,while ancillary procedures like vaginal hysterectomy, anterior/posterior vaginal wall repair without mesh or mid-urethral suspension could be performed simultaneously.
- Women who have been eligible for long-term follow-up.
- Women who agreed to participate in the study and signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who have surgical history for prolapse with mesh.
- Women who have contraindication for surgical procedure
- Women who are unable to comply with the study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
2nd Affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical college
Hefei, Anhui, 230041, China
1st Affiliated hospital of PLA general hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Suzhou City Hospital
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215008, China
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040, China
Related Publications (5)
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
PMID: 23633316BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Maher C. Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1815-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2172-1.
PMID: 24142057BACKGROUNDZhu L, Lang J, Zhang Q. Clinical study of ischia spinous fascia fixation--a new pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Apr;22(4):499-503. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1307-x.
PMID: 21060988BACKGROUNDRen C, Song XC, Zhu L, Ai FF, Shi HH, Sun ZJ, Chen J, Lang JH. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):369-373. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.003. Chinese.
PMID: 28647958BACKGROUNDHaya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, Mascarenhas T, Nussler E, Ballard E, Ankardal M, Boudemaghe T, Wu JM, Maher CF. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):755.e1-755.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
PMID: 25724403RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yongxian Lu
1st Affiliated hospital of PLA general hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhiyuan Dai
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wenyan Wang
2nd Affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical college
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhaoai Li
Shan'xi Province Women's and Children's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yuling Wang
Foshan Women's and Children's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shunyu Hou
Suzhou City Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiangjuan Li
Hangzhou Women's and Children's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lubin Liu
Chongqing Women's and Children's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Le Ma
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tao Xu
Statistics Department of Peking Union Medical College
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Schaffer
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marko J Jachtorowycz
Saint Francis Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Lan Zhu
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yuxin Dai
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Lan Zhu, MD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 25, 2019
First Posted
December 30, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
January 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share