NCT05167344

Brief Summary

Investigators will work with community partners to undertake an evaluation of the impact of the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E) for youth to build evidence on effective programming with diverse vulnerable youth populations in real-world contexts. Youth participants will complete four surveys before and after participating in the HRP-E program and an interview approximately 4 to 6 months after participating in the program. Program facilitators will also track session activities and youth participation throughout the program and are invited to participate in a survey after the program is complete.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 14, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

November 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

vulnerable youthsocial-emotional functioningdating violencemental health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Positive social-emotional functioning

    Measured by the Social-Emotional Assets and Resiliency Scales-Adolescent (SEARS-A) that assesses social-emotional assets of responsibility, self-regulation, social competence, and empathy. Participants respond to the 35 items on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, 3 = always). The combined total score ranges from 0 to 105 with higher scores indicating greater social-emotional strengths.

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Dating Violence

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

  • Help-seeking intentions

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

  • Actual help-seeking

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

  • Positive mental health

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

  • Emotional distress

    Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)

Study Arms (1)

Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E)

EXPERIMENTAL

Youth participating in the HRP-E and facilitators delivering in the program

Behavioral: Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced

Interventions

The Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E) is a small group mental health promotion and healthy relationship program designed for vulnerable, at-risk youth. It is a trauma-informed, 16-session manualized program.

Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E)

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Youth participating in the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
  • Facilitators delivering the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
  • A minimum of three youth participating as a group in the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced

You may not qualify if:

  • Youth with low literacy or cognitive functions who may not be able to complete the self-report measures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Western University

London, Ontario, N6G 1G7, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Andrews, N., Pepler, D., Motz, M. (2019). Research and evaluation with community-based projects: Approaches, considerations, and strategies. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(4), 548-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019835821

    BACKGROUND
  • Antle, B. F., Sullivan, D. J., Dryden, A., Karam, E. A., & Barbee, A. P. (2011). Healthy relationship education for dating violence prevention among high-risk youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 173-179. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.031

    BACKGROUND
  • Crooks CV, Scott K, Ellis W, Wolfe DA. Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories. Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

    PMID: 21652072BACKGROUND
  • Crooks CV, Scott KL, Broll R, Zwarych S, Hughes R, Wolfe DA. Does an evidence-based healthy relationships program for 9th graders show similar effects for 7th and 8th graders? Results from 57 schools randomized to intervention. Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):513-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv014. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

    PMID: 25840436BACKGROUND
  • Smyth, P. (2017). Working with high-risk youth: A relationship-based practice framework. Routledge Academic. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270043

    BACKGROUND
  • Wekerle C, Leung E, Wall AM, MacMillan H, Boyle M, Trocme N, Waechter R. The contribution of childhood emotional abuse to teen dating violence among child protective services-involved youth. Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

    PMID: 19167066BACKGROUND
  • Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, Chiodo D, Hughes R, Ellis W, Stitt L, Donner A. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Aug;163(8):692-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.69.

    PMID: 19652099BACKGROUND
  • Wolfe DA, Crooks CV, Chiodo D, Hughes R, Ellis W. Observations of adolescent peer resistance skills following a classroom-based healthy relationship program: a post-intervention comparison. Prev Sci. 2012 Apr;13(2):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0256-z.

    PMID: 22057307BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Adolescent BehaviorPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorPersonal Satisfaction

Study Officials

  • Dr. Claire Croooks, PhD

    Western University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Claire Crooks

CONTACT

Meghan Fournie

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to have blinded conditions.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Youth and facilitators participating in HRP-E program (intervention arm)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor; Director, Centre for School Mental Health

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2021

First Posted

December 22, 2021

Study Start

April 14, 2022

Primary Completion

April 1, 2023

Study Completion

April 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations