Virtual and Video Counseling Versus In-Office Counseling for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare preparedness for total laparoscopic hysterectomies between patients who undergo virtual visits and those who undergo in-office visits for pre-operative counseling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
February 1, 2025
4.6 years
October 1, 2021
February 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in patient preparedness
Assess differences in patient preparedness at the time of the surgery between patients who received video and virtual pre-operative counseling versus those who received in-person counseling.
Up to time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Unplanned office or emergency department visit
Up to 6 weeks after surgery
Same-day discharge versus admission rates
Up to 1 day after surgery
Readmission rates
Up to 6 weeks after surgery
Study Arms (2)
In-Office Visit Group
NO INTERVENTIONThis control group will undergo standard in-office pre-operative counseling visit.
Virtual Visit Group
EXPERIMENTALThis study group will receive pre-operative counseling via video, created by the Department of Gynecology at Cleveland Clinic Florida, followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider.
Interventions
Intervention will be a pre-operative counseling video followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider, using standard and secure communications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic etiologies.
- Age of 20 years or older
- Understand English language (written and spoken) without difficulty
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 20 years old
- Diagnosis of malignancy
- No access to technology that would allow for watching counseling video and/or completion of virtual visit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
Related Publications (5)
Krantz TE, Rogers RG, Petersen TR, Dunivan GC, White AB, Madsen AM, Jeppson PC, Ninivaggio CS, Cichowski SB, Komesu YM. Peer-Centered Versus Standard Physician-Centered Video Counseling for Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;26(8):470-476. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000784.
PMID: 31596774BACKGROUNDGreene KA, Wyman AM, Scott LA, Hart S, Hoyte L, Bassaly R. Evaluation of patient preparedness for surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):179.e1-179.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
PMID: 28431952BACKGROUNDFountain CR, Havrilesky LJ. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):932-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
PMID: 28501452BACKGROUNDKenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.059.
PMID: 18060968BACKGROUNDBrubaker L, Litman HJ, Rickey L, Dyer KY, Markland AD, Sirls L, Norton P, Casiano E, Paraiso MF, Ghetti C, Rahn DD, Kusek JW. Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
PMID: 23912506BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katrin Arnolds, MD
Cleveland Clinic Florida Gynecology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2021
First Posted
October 20, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared with other researchers. The goal of the study is to look at outcomes of each cohort and it is not necessary to analyze each IPD.