Data-driven SDM to Reduce Symptom Burden in AF
Data-driven Shared Decision-Making (SDM) to Reduce Symptom Burden in Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
3 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study is a single-group feasibility study evaluating decision aid visualizations which display common post-ablation symptom patterns as a tool for shared decision-making. The specific aim of the clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of putting the visualizations into clinical practice (n=75). The hypothesis is that patients will report low decisional conflict and decision regret and high satisfaction with their decision about whether to undergo an ablation or not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2025
CompletedFebruary 18, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.2 years
July 27, 2021
February 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Decisional conflict assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale
Conflict about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale on a scale of 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Baseline
Decision regret assessed using the Decisional Regret Scale
Regret about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decision Regret Scale on a scale of 0 (no decision regret) to 100 (extremely high decision regret).
12 weeks
Decision satisfaction assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale
Satisfaction about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale on a scale of 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction).
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post-ablation symptom burden assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation severity Scale (AFSS)
12 weeks
Post-ablation health-related quality of life assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire
12 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Shared decision-making tool
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will view a shared decision-making tool while they are undergoing consultation to have an atrial fibrillation ablation.
Interventions
Participants will use an interactive web page intended to aid patient decision-making (i.e., a decision aid) while undergoing consultation for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of paroxysmal AF according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10)
- Scheduled consultation at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) to discuss catheter ablation
- Symptomatic AF at baseline
- Age 18 years and older
- Able to read and speak English
- Willing/able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Asymptomatic AF
- Severe cognitive impairment
- Major psychiatric illness
- Concomitant terminal illness that would preclude participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Columbia Universitylead
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, 07030, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (1)
Reading Turchioe M, Shamnath A, Slotwiner D, Zhao Y, Saluja D, Goldbarg S, Kim J, Varosy P, Biviano A. Evaluating a digital decision aid for atrial fibrillation rhythm control in a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2026 Mar 6. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-02405-y. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41792400DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meghan Reading Turchioe, PhD, MPH, RN
Columbia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Nursing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2021
First Posted
August 6, 2021
Study Start
March 25, 2024
Primary Completion
June 20, 2025
Study Completion
August 20, 2025
Last Updated
February 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 years and ending 5 years following publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and have completed Data Use Agreements.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available to other researchers upon reasonable request after Data Use Agreements have been executed.