NCT04993807

Brief Summary

This study is a single-group feasibility study evaluating decision aid visualizations which display common post-ablation symptom patterns as a tool for shared decision-making. The specific aim of the clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of putting the visualizations into clinical practice (n=75). The hypothesis is that patients will report low decisional conflict and decision regret and high satisfaction with their decision about whether to undergo an ablation or not.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2021

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 25, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 20, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Shared Decision-Making (SDM)Symptom BurdenDecisional ConflictDecision RegretDecision Satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Decisional conflict assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale

    Conflict about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale on a scale of 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).

    Baseline

  • Decision regret assessed using the Decisional Regret Scale

    Regret about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Decision Regret Scale on a scale of 0 (no decision regret) to 100 (extremely high decision regret).

    12 weeks

  • Decision satisfaction assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale

    Satisfaction about the decision to undergo atrial fibrillation will be assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale on a scale of 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction).

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Post-ablation symptom burden assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation severity Scale (AFSS)

    12 weeks

  • Post-ablation health-related quality of life assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire

    12 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Shared decision-making tool

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will view a shared decision-making tool while they are undergoing consultation to have an atrial fibrillation ablation.

Other: Shared decision-making tool

Interventions

Participants will use an interactive web page intended to aid patient decision-making (i.e., a decision aid) while undergoing consultation for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Shared decision-making tool

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of paroxysmal AF according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10)
  • Scheduled consultation at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) to discuss catheter ablation
  • Symptomatic AF at baseline
  • Age 18 years and older
  • Able to read and speak English
  • Willing/able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Asymptomatic AF
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Major psychiatric illness
  • Concomitant terminal illness that would preclude participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, 07030, United States

Location

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Reading Turchioe M, Shamnath A, Slotwiner D, Zhao Y, Saluja D, Goldbarg S, Kim J, Varosy P, Biviano A. Evaluating a digital decision aid for atrial fibrillation rhythm control in a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2026 Mar 6. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-02405-y. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationPatient Participation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Meghan Reading Turchioe, PhD, MPH, RN

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a single arm feasibility study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Nursing

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2021

First Posted

August 6, 2021

Study Start

March 25, 2024

Primary Completion

June 20, 2025

Study Completion

August 20, 2025

Last Updated

February 18, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available to other researchers upon reasonable request after Data Use Agreements have been executed.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 3 years and ending 5 years following publication.
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and have completed Data Use Agreements.

Locations