The Effect of Root-canal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain in Re-treatment Cases
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Three Different Root-canal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain in Re-treatment Cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial compares the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2021
CompletedSeptember 22, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.3 years
September 8, 2021
September 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
6 th hours
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12 th hours.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
12 th hour
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 24th hours.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
24 th hour
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 2nd days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
2nd days
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 3th days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
3th days
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4th days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
4th days
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 5th days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
5th days
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
6th days
Pain level comparison after the application of three different root canal medicaments in root canal : VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 7th days.
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
7th days
Study Arms (3)
Calcium hydroxide ( Ca(OH)2 )
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal medicament which was placed into root canals with a lentulo spiral.
Chlorhexidine gel (CHX gel)
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal medicament which was placed into root canals with a lentulo spiral.
Calcium hydroxide+ CHX gel
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal medicament which was placed into root canals with a lentulo spiral.
Interventions
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between 20 - 65 years of ages
- Patients who agree to participate this study
- Not taking analgesic or antibiotics in the last week
- Single root and single-canal incisor, canine, premolar teeth that have been treated only once before
- Teeth with previous endodontic treatment but with insufficient root canal filling on radiographic examination
- Teeth with periapical lesions and at least 2 years since the previous treatment, although root canal filling seems sufficient
- Periapical radiolucency, teeth with increased or unchanged according to pre-treatment radiography (if available)
- Teeth are asymptomatic
- Patients who had good oral hygiene
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant patients and patients in lactation period
- Having used corticosteroids in the last 6 months
- Individuals with systemic diseases (endocarditis, immune system diseases,etc.) requiring antibiotic prophylaxis
- Having received immunosuppressive therapy within the last week
- Patients who had systemic or allergic sensitivty for the NSAIDs and local ananesthetics
- The presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth \> 4 mm)
- The presence of a foreign body in the root canal that prevents entry (broken file, post, etc.)
- Fracture or crack in the root
- Teeth that cannot reach the working length due to calcification in the root canal and step formation
- Teeth that cannot be restored due to excessive loss of material in the coronal structure
- The presence of more than one adjacent tooth requiring endodontic treatment that may cause reflected pain in the same patient.
- Teeth that develop any complications ( breakage of endodontic file, perforation, inability to determine the working length with the apex finder) during the removal of the canal filling material.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hicran Dönmez Özkan
Merkez, Aydın, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Erdem Hepsenoglu Y, Eyuboglu TF, Ozcan M. Postoperative Pain Intensity after Single- versus Two-visit Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Sep;44(9):1339-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
PMID: 30054099BACKGROUNDGondim E Jr, Setzer FC, Dos Carmo CB, Kim S. Postoperative pain after the application of two different irrigation devices in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
PMID: 20647083BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2021
First Posted
September 22, 2021
Study Start
March 23, 2019
Primary Completion
June 23, 2020
Study Completion
August 23, 2020
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09