Root Canal Disinfection: a Comparison Between Techniques
Comparison Between Two Different Techniques of Root Canal Disinfection (XP-endo Finisher Versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation): Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Caries disease is still the leading cause of severe tooth decay. Since this can lead to tooth loss, it is important that appropriate treatment is advised to help prevent damage and maintain tooth health. Faced with major coronary destruction, several times it becomes necessary to perform the endodontic treatment, aiming to maintain the element in the buccal cavity for longer. It is known that an excellent restorative treatment with poor endodontic treatment and vice versa has a direct impact on the (in) success of the treatment. In this context, the proper cleaning of the root canals is highlighted, aiming the removal of bacteria and toxins. There are several cleaning methods described in the literature, but it is not yet known which would be the most effective in the removal of these contaminants. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, patients who need and meet the inclusion criteria will undergo endodontic treatment in two different root canal cleansing techniques (passive ultrasonic cleaning and cleaning with the XP Endo device). Patients will be monitored annually after finish your endodontic treatment to evaluate the periradicular repair and the quality of endodontic treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedApril 6, 2018
April 1, 2018
12 months
March 15, 2018
April 5, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Periradicular repair
This outcome will be evaluated radiographically by one calibrated examiner.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quality of endodontic treatment
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Root canal disinfection with XP-endo Finisher
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal disinfection with passive ultrasonic irrigation
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The XP-Endo® finisher will be used next to the X-Smart Plus endodontic motor, with speed settings at 800rpm and torque at 1 N.cm. Irrigation with 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl will be performed in three cycles of one minute each. In each cycle the XP-Endo will be used in the working length in continuous and slow movements of entrance and exit, with amplitude of 5mm, for a period of 1 minute, followed by new irrigation with 2.5ml of EDTA solution or hypochlorite of sodium 2,5%. Finally, the channel will be completely dry with absorbent paper tips
For cleaning using passive ultrasonic irrigation, the E1 Irrisonic tip (Helse Ultrasonic, Ribeirão Preto, SP), will be used with Jetlaxis Sonic BP LED (Schuster, Santa Maria, RS). The insert has a diameter equivalent to a manual file 20, with reduced taper (0.01). The power used will be 10%. With root canals flooded with 17% EDTA, the irrigation tips will be coupled to the ultrasound and 1mm shorter than the working length. These tips will be kept in the center of the canal avoiding contact with the dentin walls. The irrigation will be performed in three cycles, and in each cycle the irrigation tips will be activated for 1 minute followed by new irrigation with 2.5ml EDTA. The same procedure will be repeated with 2.5% NaoCl. Finally, the channel will be completely dry with absorbent paper tips.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or more;
- good general healthy;
- molars or premolar requiring endodontic treatment;
- at least 20 teeth;
You may not qualify if:
- root fracture;
- injury involving the furcation region
- need to behave as a prosthetic abutment;
- mobility greater than degree I;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal University of Pelotas
Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015560, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2018
First Posted
April 6, 2018
Study Start
May 2, 2018
Primary Completion
April 30, 2019
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share