Clini Asses of Retentn,Pt Satisfactn and Recurrent Caries of Endocrs Versus Post Crs Using Reinforced Lithium Silicate
Clinical Assessment of Retention, Patient Satisfaction and Recurrent Caries of Endocrowns Versus Post Retained Crowns Using Reinforced Lithium Silicate.
1 other identifier
interventional
18
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Coronal retention of the restoration of RCT teeth is usually compromised, thus intraradicular posts combined or not with core material may be required. The drawbacks of the conventional treatment created a necessary demand to have alternative treatment options. Among these options is the endocrown restoration. The pulpal chamber cavity provides retention and stability. Its trapezoidal shape in mandibular molars and triangular shape in maxillary molars increase the restoration's stability. The saddle form of the pulpal floor increases stability. This anatomy, along with the adhesive qualities of the bonding material, make no need for additional preparation or further use of post-involving root canals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 30, 2018
October 1, 2018
12 months
October 16, 2018
October 26, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrent caries
It will be assessed using United States public health service (USPHS) criteria.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction
one year
Retention
one year
Study Arms (2)
Reinforced lithium silicate endocrown
EXPERIMENTALDevice: Endocrown restoration
Reinforced lithi silicate crn e post
ACTIVE COMPARATORDevice: Post retained reinforced lithium silicate crowns
Interventions
The endodontically treated tooth will be impressed, and an endocrown restoration will be manufactured with reinforced lithium silicate and cemented with self adhesive cement
The endodontically treated tooth will receive a fiber post cemented with self adhesive cement and after this, the tooth will be impressed and reinforced lithium silicate crown will be cemented with self adhesive cement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age range of 18-55 years.
- Patients physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures.
- Co-operative patients approving to participate in this trial.
- Patients with root canal treated lower first molars requiring full coverage restoration.
- Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and assessments.
- Endodontically treated teeth with absence of clinical diagnosis of periapical pathosis, fistula, swelling of periodontal tissues, abnormal tooth mobility and history of sensitivity to pressure
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Disabilities which will not be cooperative patient for the study.
- Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised patients as uncontrolled diabetes or oral cancer.
- Patients suffer from parafunctional habits
- Teeth with fractured roots
- Teeth with lesions extending apical to the cemento-enamel junction
- Poor oral hygiene.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcome assessor will be blinded to avoid performance, detection and analysis bias. Only main investigator will be aware of the allocated patients in each group and the specific type of intervention given to every patient
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer,fixed prosthodontic department,faculty of dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2018
First Posted
October 22, 2018
Study Start
November 15, 2018
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
November 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share