The Relationship Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scores and Sensory Testing in Axial Spondyloarthritis

NCT05021783 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 09.2021.64
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 24
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Axial spondyloarthritis is one of the most common rheumatic diseases and chronic pain and morning stiffness are the main complaints of these patients. Central sensitization is defined as increased response to normal or sub-threshold stimuli of central nervous system and its close relationship with many rheumatological diseases has been demonstrated in several studies. There is no method for the diagnosis of central sensitization is accepted as a gold standard. The clinical scales and quantitative sensory testing (QST) widely is used for this purpose widely. The most commonly used QST types include pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The well-known scale used for the evaluation of central sensitization is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) , developed in 2011 for detect central sensitization in chronic pain patients. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between QST and CSI and sacroiliac MRI changes.

Conditions

Central Sensitisation; Axial Spondyloarthritis; Inflammation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)

  25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms, which are frequently found in patients with central sensitization in part A, are questioned. In part B, the presence of diseases whose relationship with central sensitization is well defined is questioned in the patient without participating in scoring. Central sensitization is assumed in patients who score 40 or more over 100 points. As the score increases, the severity of sensitization is considered to increase.

  1 months

• Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

  The sacroiliac PPT scores were obtained from four measurement points; the first point was located 1 cm medially and caudally from spina iliaca posterior superior (SIPS) and 3 more laterally, medially, and cranially. Lower scores are interpreted in favor of increased pain sensitization.

  1 months

• Temporal summation (TS)

  TS will be evaluated over the trapezius muscle and sacroiliac joints with manuel algometer. In the evaluation of TS, a pressure as much the PPT value of each point will be applied with pain pressure algometer ten times with a 1-second interstimulus interval. Patients will be asked to rate their pain using on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at 0, 5, and 10 seconds. TS will be calculated by subtracting the rating at 0 seconds from the rating at 10 seconds. The point that is located 1 cm medially and caudally from SIPS was used for SI joint TS measurement on both sides. As the score increases, the severity of sensitization is considered to increase.

  1 months

• Conditioned pain modulation (CPM)

  First stimulus will be applied to trapezius with the pressure that induced a pain intensity of 4 point on a 10 point VAS as called a test stimulus. After that the right hand of the patient will be immersed in 7 Celsius water for 20 seconds to create a conditioning stimulus. Second test stimulus with the same intensity of first one will be applied to trapezius after the conditioning stimulus and patients will be asked to rate their pain. If the patients cannot hold their hand in the water for 20 seconds, the test stimulus will be applied immediately after the patients removed their hands out of water. The ratio between the first and second VAS values multiplied by 100 will be defined as CPM score. Higher scores indicate better descending pain inhibition.

  1 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system

  1 months

Study Arms (1)

Patients

Patients with Axial SpondyloArthritis

Diagnostic Test: Pressure pain threshold; Diagnostic Test: Central Sensitization Inventory; Other: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada scoring system; Diagnostic Test: Temporal Summation; Diagnostic Test: Conditioned pain modulation

Interventions

Pressure pain threshold DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The sacroiliac PPT scores will be obtained bilaterally from four measurement points; the first point is located 1 cm medially and caudally from spina iliaca posterior superior (SIPS) and 3 more laterally, medially and cranially.The left trapezius muscle will be used to evaluate distant control point .The 1 cm2 algometer probe will be placed vertically in the each selected point and pressure will be increased with 0.1 kg/sc until the participant reporting pressure became painful. The pressure value at which the pain is first felt will be accepted as the PPT of that point.

Also known as: PPT

Patients

Central Sensitization Inventory DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Standardized questionnaire to determine the level of central sensitization

Also known as: CSI

Patients

Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada scoring system OTHER

SPARCC scoring consists of two subcomponents to detect sacroiliitis activation and structural damage. In the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence, 6 consecutive coronal sections will be examined and the signal increase will be scored as 0 = normal signal and 1 = increased signal. In this way, the maximum score can be 12 in a single coronal section. Evaluations Total maximum score of 72 in 6 consecutive coronal sections. In structural scoring, similar to sacroiliitis scoring, the SI joint is divided into four quadrants to evaluate whether there is fatty change, erosion, backfill and ankylosis. Each lesion is scored as 0=absent or 1=present. In this way, fatty change and erosion can be scored between 0-40 and backfill and ankylosis can be scored between 0-20 in 5 consecutive sections in total scoring.

Also known as: SPARCC

Patients

Temporal Summation DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

TS will be evaluated over the trapezius muscle and sacroiliac joints with manuel algometer. In the evaluation of TS, a pressure as much the PPT value of each point will be applied with pain pressure algometer ten times with a 1-second interstimulus interval. Patients will be asked to rate their pain using on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at 0, 5, and 10 seconds. TS will be calculated by subtracting the rating at 0 seconds from the rating at 10 seconds. The point that is located 1 cm medially and caudally from SIPS was used for SI joint TS measurement on both sides.

Also known as: TS

Patients

Conditioned pain modulation DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

First stimulus will be applied to trapezius with the pressure that induced a pain intensity of 4 point on a 10 point VAS as called a test stimulus. After that the right hand of the patient will be immersed in 7 Celsius water for 20 seconds to create a conditioning stimulus. Second test stimulus with the same intensity of first one will be applied to trapezius after the conditioning stimulus and patients will be asked to rate their pain. If the patients cannot hold their hand in the water for 20 seconds, the test stimulus will be applied immediately after the patients removed their hands out of water. The ratio between the first and second VAS values multiplied by 100 will be defined as CPM score

Also known as: CPM

Patients

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

AxSpA patientsThe patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with axSpA according to the ASAS criteria will be recruited from a Rheumatology outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care hospital

You may qualify if:

• Diagnosed with axSpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
• Aged between 18-65 years

You may not qualify if:

• Had an other rheumatic diseases, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy and spine disease (e.g., symptomatic herniated disc, spinal stenosis),
• Using centrally acting pain medications (e.g., pregabaline, duloxetine, opioids) or glucocorticoids (\>10 mg prednisone or its equivalent) within 3 months of study enrollment

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Marmara University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Marmara University

Istanbul, 34100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (8)

• Kiltz U, Baraliakos X, Regel A, Buhring B, Braun J. Causes of pain in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 107(5):102-107. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

  PMID: 28967358 RESULT

• Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl. 1986;3:S1-226. No abstract available.

  PMID: 3461421 RESULT

• Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Tolle TR, Treede -DR, Beyer A, Binder A, Birbaumer N, Birklein F, Botefur IC, Braune S, Flor H, Huge V, Klug R, Landwehrmeyer GB, Magerl W, Maihofner C, Rolko C, Schaub C, Scherens A, Sprenger T, Valet M, Wasserka B. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain. 2006 Aug;123(3):231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041. Epub 2006 May 11.

  PMID: 16697110 RESULT

• Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, Dhillon SS, Williams M, Stone M, Conner-Spady B, Palsat J, Lambert RG. Spondyloarthritis research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):703-9. doi: 10.1002/art.21445.

  PMID: 16208659 RESULT

• Maksymowych WP, Wichuk S, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Lambert RG, Pedersen SJ. Development and preliminary validation of the spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging sacroiliac joint structural score. J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):79-86. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140519. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

  PMID: 25320219 RESULT

• Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, Howard KJ, Choi YH, Williams MJ, Perez Y, Gatchel RJ. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 2012 Apr;12(4):276-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00493.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

  PMID: 21951710 RESULT

• van Leeuwen RJ, Szadek K, de Vet H, Zuurmond W, Perez R. Pain Pressure Threshold in the Region of the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients Diagnosed with Sacroiliac Joint Pain. Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):147-54.

  PMID: 27008288 RESULT

• de Goeij M, van Eijk LT, Vanelderen P, Wilder-Smith OH, Vissers KC, van der Hoeven JG, Kox M, Scheffer GJ, Pickkers P. Systemic inflammation decreases pain threshold in humans in vivo. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e84159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084159. eCollection 2013.

  PMID: 24358337 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis; Inflammation

Interventions

Postsynaptic Potential Summation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spondylarthropathies; Spondylarthritis; Spondylitis; Spinal Diseases; Bone Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Ankylosis; Joint Diseases; Arthritis; Pathologic Processes; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Synaptic Transmission; Signal Transduction; Biochemical Phenomena; Chemical Phenomena; Synaptic Potentials; Membrane Potentials; Cell Physiological Phenomena; Electrophysiological Phenomena; Physiological Phenomena; Nervous System Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE ONLY
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Target Duration: 30 Days
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 16, 2021
• First Posted: August 26, 2021
• Study Start: February 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: August 1, 2021
• Study Completion: August 15, 2021
• Last Updated: August 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)