Continuous vs Liposomal Bupivacaine Interscalene Block for Proximal Humeral Fracture (CLIP)
Continuous Standard Bupivacaine Versus Single Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Pain Management After Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Restricted range of shoulder motion following ORIF is a potential complication that severely affects the patients' functional outcome and should be actively avoided by means of adequate pain control in addition to early mobilization and physiotherapy. Peripheral nerve blocks, which can be given as a single injection or continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter, are analgesic options to be considered. Interscalene Block (ISB) is the regional analgesia of choice for the shoulder and proximal humerus region. While continuous infusion (aka continuous nerve block) offers the advantage of a longer duration of analgesia compared to a single injection of standard local anaesthetic, it is associated with an inherent risk of catheter displacement, dislodgement, obstruction, and infection. Compared to Standard Bupivacaine (SB), Liposomal Bupivacaine (LB) is a formulation designed to prolong the duration of action to up to 72 hours by slow release of bupivacaine from the multi-vesicular liposomes. Several studies have demonstrated satisfactory analgesic effects of liposomal bupivacaine given as local surgical site infiltration over placebo. However, the effects of single injection of liposomal bupivacaine given via local surgical site infiltration compared to continuous nerve block have been inconsistent. Administrating liposomal bupivacaine directly to peripheral nerve blocks is a potentially effective approach that has not been extensively studied. ISB with single shot liposomal bupivacaine has been shown to provide superior postoperative analgesia compared to ISB with injection of standard bupivacaine or placebo. ISB with liposomal bupivacaine could perhaps prolong and improve postoperative analgesia without the potential problems with continuous nerve blocks. The analgesic effect of ISB with single shot liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous ISB with standard bupivacaine has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effect of these two analgesic modalities for plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 1, 2023
November 1, 2023
4.5 years
June 1, 2021
November 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Numerical Rating Score (NRS)
NRS (movement) = NRS during attempted passive forward flexion to 90 degrees NRS (rest) = NRS at rest Pain at rest will be evaluated every 5 mins using NRS during recovery in PACU. NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= the worst imageable pain
Changes from baseline NRS at day 7
Study Arms (2)
Liposoaml Bupivacaine (LB) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention group
Standard Bupivacaine (SB) Group
EXPERIMENTALControl group
Interventions
Single shot injection of 10ml 1.33% LB; Due to the milky colour of LB, syringe containing the LB will be covered; Followed by placement of indwelling catheter in ISB; Catheter will be connected to a fixed-rate portable elastometric pump ( Easy pump, ®) upon arrival in the recovery room by the nurse; The pump will be filled with 300ml NS; The default fixed rate of infusion will be 5ml/hr; Both the pump and the clamp will be covered by an aluminium foil; Catheter and pump will be removed on post-operative day 2
Single shot injection of 10 ml 0.25% SB in ISB; In order to have blinding to the drug injected, syringe containing SB will be covered; followed by placement of indwelling catheter in ISB; Catheter will be connected to a fixed-rate portable elastometric pump ( Easy pump, ®) upon arrival in the recovery room by the nurse; The pump will be filled with 300ml 0.2% SB; The default fixed-rate of infusion will be 5ml/hr; Both the pump and the clamp will be covered by an aluminium foil; Catheter and pump will be removed on post-operative day 2
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-III
- Age between 18 and 80
- Proximal humeral fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Revision surgery
- Pathological fracture
- part or shaft fracture
- Multiple fractures
- Unable to attend rehabilitation
- Preexisting shoulder problems
- Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMT score) \< 8
- Allergy to amide local anaesthetics, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids
- Respiratory Disease with limited respiratory reserve
- Cardiac Disease: Any degree of Heart Block, Heart Failure
- Neurological: Any Seizure Disorder
- Psychiatric illnesses affecting pain perception e.g. severe depression and anxiety disorder
- Alcohol or substance abuse
- Chronic Pain, other than chronic knee pain
- Daily use of strong opioids (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, diamorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine) before operation
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The subjects, the investigators, and all the parties involved in patient management or data collection will be blinded throughout the study period.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Honorary Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2021
First Posted
June 16, 2021
Study Start
June 4, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share