NCT04003506

Brief Summary

With aging of population, osteoarthritis of knees and hips become major orthopaedic problems in Hong Kong. Osteoarthritis of knees and hips are associated with significant pain problem and functional disability. Total joints replacement is the ultimate surgical procedures to deal with such problems. However total joints replacement is associated with significant tissue damage and post-operative pain problems, which would affect post-operative recovery and rehabilitation. The primary aims of total knee replacement are improvement in functional activities and reduce pain due to degenerated knee joints. However, there are around 20-30% of patients would develop significant pain problem despite uncomplicated total knee replacement. It accounts for major post-operative problems and burdens. Procedure specific analgesic method with multi-model analgesia technique is well-known to be useful in post-operative pain management, which reduces the post-operative pain score. However, despite using of multi-modal analgesic technique, pain after total joint replacement is still the most unsolved issue. It prolongs the recovery period and increases post-operative analgesic consumptions. Multimodal analgesia, including periarticular local infiltration of analgesia (LIA), regional nerve block, opioid and non-opioid have been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain. Periarticular LIA has been shown to be an effective way of pain management. Regional nerve block using femoral nerve block or adductor canal block (ACB) is also a well-established anlagesic technique after total knee replacement. Comparing with femoral nerve block, it involves more sensory blockade so has the advantage of quadriceps sparing, less affecting the post-operative mobilization. From most recent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials, it becomes clear that periarticular LIA has better pain control with less opioid consumption than ACB alone. However, duration of a single-dose LIA may not be long enough after total knee replacement. Recent meta-analysis has shown that combined ACB with LIA could significantly reduce pain scores and morphine consumption compared LIA alone after TKA. Standard bupivacaine, levobupivocaine, ropivocaine were used in ACB in these studies. They are local anaesthetic with half-life ranging from 3-6 hours. With the availability of liposomal bupivacaine (LB), ACB using LB may further prolong the analgesic effect of ACB as the therapeutic levels of bupivacaine, which are below the toxic range and sustained for 72 hours after injection. Therefore, the issue is whether ACB using LB has even longer analgesic effect than plain bupivacaine or ropivacaine. There was only one study directly compared ACB using LB and 0.1% ropivociane infusion. It was shown that LB had significant impact in pain control in the first 36 hours. However, this was a retrospective study and there was difference in delivery of local anaesthetics (single shot injection for liposomal bupivacaine but continuous infusion for ropivacaine). The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether ACB using liposomal bupivacaine has even longer analgesic effect than standard bupivacaine (SB) and its cost effectiveness. Secondary aims are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic data of standard bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine in adductor canal block and pharmacokinetic data of ropivocaine level in LIA.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
4mo left

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Mar 2024Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2019

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2024

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 1, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 29, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

bupivacaineLIAACBtotal knee replacementpost operative painacute painanaesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain assessed by numerical rating scales (NRS) pain scores

    NRS pain scores (from 0-10, where 0 is the least satisfaction and 10 most satisfaction) will be recorded during movement and at rest, by NRS (movement) and NRS (rest) respectively

    at postoperative day 1

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Range of motion (ROM) of knee

    from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6

  • Walking Distance

    from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6

  • Degree of assistance

    from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6

  • Ability to preform straight leg raising

    from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6

  • Plasma level of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.

    at before ACB, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after ACB.

Study Arms (2)

Group LB

EXPERIMENTAL

local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) with adductor canal block (ACB) will be given using 10ml of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine with 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine

Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine

group SB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

LIA with ACB will be given using 20ml 0.5%standard bupivacaine

Drug: Bupivacaine Injection

Interventions

LIA with ACB will be given using 10ml of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine + 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine

Group LB

LIA with ACB will be given using 20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine

group SB

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I-III
  • Age 18-80 years old
  • Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee replacement
  • Chinese patients
  • BMI \< 40
  • Able to speak and understand Cantonese
  • Able to provide informed oral and written consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Revision total knee replacement
  • Single stage bilateral total knee replacement
  • Known allergy to opioids, local anaesthetic drugs, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) including COX-2 inhibitors
  • History of chronic pain other than chronic knee pain
  • History of immunosuppression
  • Daily use of glucocorticoids
  • Daily use of strong opioids (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine)
  • History of severe heart disease (NYHA 2)
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Impaired renal function, defined as preoperative serum creatinine level over 120 μmol/L
  • Pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders
  • Psychiatric illness or neurologic or psychiatric diseases potentially influencing pain perception
  • Impaired or retarded mental state
  • Difficulties in using patient controlled analgesia (PCA)
  • Pregnancy
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAcute Pain

Interventions

Bupivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Chi Wing Chan, MBBS

    Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Chi Wing Chan, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2019

First Posted

July 1, 2019

Study Start

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 1, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations