Neuroendocrine Changes in Cervical Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization Non-specific Mechanical Neck Pain
Neuroendocrine Changes After Cervical Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization in Subjects With Non-specific Mechanical Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim for this graduate student research project is to determine if cervical spinal mobilization releases similar neuropeptides and endogenous hormones as compared to cervical spinal manipulation and a control group. We hypothesized that application of cervical manipulations would result in a neuroendocrine response (SNS- HPA axis). By measuring salivary cortisol, oxytocin and DHEA, it may be possible to provide important information regarding the mechanisms and associations of pain modulation, anti-inflammatory and tissue healing after a biomechanical event.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2023
CompletedJanuary 20, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.6 years
May 28, 2021
January 19, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neck Disability Index
Survey used to assess self-rated disability in patients with neck pain.
change between baseline and 2 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
change between baseline and 2 days
Global Ratio of Change
change between baseline and 2 days
Salivary Biomarkers
change between baseline and 15, 30 and 60 minutes after intervention.
Study Arms (3)
cervical manipulation
EXPERIMENTALThe cervical spinal manipulation will consist of one session of a standard technique that will be performed by an experienced (\>10 years) doctor of physical therapy practitioner. The technique is described by Gibbons and Tehan as a high-velocity, mid-range, low amplitude force at the segment of pain and/or segmental restrcition. The participant will lay comfortably in a supine position, the practitioner will then use his clinical discretion to select the most appropriate or symptomatic cervical motion segments and attempt to localize the manual thrust at those levels. A maximum of 2 attempts for each side of the cervical spine will be allowed regardless of the having achieved joint cavitation. This type of cervical manipulation procedure is described by Gibbons and Tehan as "Minimal Leverage Thrust" and it results in optimal patient comfort while receiving the treatment thus reducing post-treatment soreness/pain.
cervical mobilization
EXPERIMENTALThe cervical spinal mobilization treatment will also consist of one session of a standard technique that will be performed by an experienced (\>10 years) doctor of physical therapy practitioner. For this procedure, the participant will lay comfortably in a prone position, the practitioner will then use his clinical discretion to select the most appropriate or symptomatic cervical motion segments and attempt to localize the manual forces at those segments. The magnitude of a mobilization-or how hard the therapist pushes on the spine-is usually reported as the magnitude of force. For an oscillatory posterior-anterior (PA) mobilization technique, the maximum magnitude of applied force is usually reported as the mean of the force peaks that occur during a specified period.34 The cervical mobilization will consist of oscillations of 1Hz and magnitude forces of 30 Newtons (N) for 30 seconds, 90N for 120 seconds and 30N for 30 seconds at the localized segment.
postural correction education
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be presented with a standardized educational short video regarding the importance of postural correction movements.
Interventions
High-velocity, mid-range, low amplitude force at the segment of pain and/or segmental restriction. The participant will lay comfortably in a supine position, the practitioner will then use his clinical discretion to select the most appropriate or symptomatic cervical motion segments and attempt to localize the manual thrust at those levels. A maximum of 2 attempts for each side of the cervical spine will be allowed regardless of the having achieved joint cavitation.
Participant will lay comfortably in a prone position, the practitioner will then use his clinical discretion to select the most appropriate or symptomatic cervical motion segments and attempt to localize the manual forces at those segments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will be healthy male and females between 18 to 60 years of age.
- Resting neck pain ≤ 30 days that is mechanical in nature without radiating pain below shoulder.
- Neck Disability Index ≥ 10/50.
- Negative Upper Cervical instability tests such as Sharper-Purser test, Alar ligament test and Transverse ligament test.
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical Arterial Dysfunctions.
- Serious medical conditions (CA, spinal cord injury).
- History of instability disorders (History of neck injury, surgery, fractures, osteoporosis, arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis).
- Neurological conditions (Nerve root compression, central nervous system involvement, myelopathy, fibromyalgia.
- Endocrine dysfunctions (Autoimmune-related diseases, adrenal gland pathology, systematic metabolic disorders).
- Pregnancy/Lactating/Postpartum.
- Pending legal action regarding their neck pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, California, 92350, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Everett Lohman, Dsc
Loma Linda University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Dean for Graduate Academic & Research Affairs Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2021
First Posted
June 3, 2021
Study Start
June 17, 2021
Primary Completion
January 10, 2023
Study Completion
January 10, 2023
Last Updated
January 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01