NCT02036905

Brief Summary

The objective of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial. The primary objective is to determine if manipulation applied to the cervical and thoracic spines is more effective than mobilization applied to the cervical and thoracic spines for the management of patients with mechanical neck pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 15, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 26, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 15, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

neck pain, orthopedic manual therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The NDI is a reliable and valid outcome tool for patients with neck pain. It is a self-report measurement tool that was specifically constructed to measure the degree of disability for persons with neck pain. There are 10 total items that are ranked from 0-5 giving a total possible number of 50 points. The larger the score, the greater the disability for that individual.

    Initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, and discharge expected average 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • change in numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)

    initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, discharge expected average 4 weeks

  • Change in patient specific functional scale (PSFS)

    Initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, and at discharge expected average 4 weeks.

  • Change in the global rating of change

    after visit 2 (expected average day 3) and again at discharge expected average 4 weeks.

  • Percent recovery

    Measured at discharge expected average of 4 weeks into protocol

  • Change in deep cervical flexor endurance test

    Initial examination, after 2 visit (expected average day 3) and at discharge ( expected average 4 weeks),

Study Arms (2)

Cervical and thoracic mobilization

EXPERIMENTAL

Cervical and thoracic mobilization: described as a repetitive low-velocity oscillatory movement applied to a joint segment. It is graded 1-4 based on the size of the amplitude and where in range it is being applied. The mobilization technique chosen will be based on the examination and clinical reasoning process of the therapist. The cervical and thoracic mobilization will be applied to the most provocative level.

Other: Cervical and thoracic mobilization

Cervical and thoracic manipulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Cervical and thoracic manipulation: is defined as high-velocity low-amplitude thrust at end range of a particular spinal segment. The therapist performs this technique by taking up all available slack at a particular segment and applying a high-velocity thrust through the end-range restriction. The manipulation technique will be chosen based on the examination and clinical reasoning process of the therapist.

Other: cervical and thoracic manipulation

Interventions

Described in arm description

Cervical and thoracic mobilization

described in arm description

Cervical and thoracic manipulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • subjects aged 18-70 years old with a chief complaint of reproducible neck pain and an NDI score of 10 or greater.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Rehabilitex Inc.

Solon, Ohio, 44139, United States

Location

Pain Relief and Physical Therapy

Havertown, Pennsylvania, 19083, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Dunning JR, Cleland JA, Waldrop MA, Arnot CF, Young IA, Turner M, Sigurdsson G. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;42(1):5-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

  • Cross KM, Kuenze C, Grindstaff TL, Hertel J. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation improves pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;41(9):633-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3670. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

  • Lau HM, Wing Chiu TT, Lam TH. The effectiveness of thoracic manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain - a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2011 Apr;16(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

  • Leaver AM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Jull G, McAuley JH. Efficacy of manipulation for non-specific neck pain of recent onset: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Feb 26;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-18.

  • Miller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.02.007. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • David W. Griswold, DPT

    Youngstown State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David W Griswold, DPT

    Youngstown State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Kenneth Learman

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2013

First Posted

January 15, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 26, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations