Cervical and Upper Thoracic Mobilization and Manipulation for Mechanical Neck Pain
Comparing the Early Use of Cervical/Upper Thoracic Mobilization and Manipulation for Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial. The primary objective is to determine if manipulation applied to the cervical and thoracic spines is more effective than mobilization applied to the cervical and thoracic spines for the management of patients with mechanical neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 26, 2016
January 1, 2016
11 months
July 15, 2013
January 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
The NDI is a reliable and valid outcome tool for patients with neck pain. It is a self-report measurement tool that was specifically constructed to measure the degree of disability for persons with neck pain. There are 10 total items that are ranked from 0-5 giving a total possible number of 50 points. The larger the score, the greater the disability for that individual.
Initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, and discharge expected average 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
change in numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)
initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, discharge expected average 4 weeks
Change in patient specific functional scale (PSFS)
Initial evaluation, 2nd visit expected average day 3, and at discharge expected average 4 weeks.
Change in the global rating of change
after visit 2 (expected average day 3) and again at discharge expected average 4 weeks.
Percent recovery
Measured at discharge expected average of 4 weeks into protocol
Change in deep cervical flexor endurance test
Initial examination, after 2 visit (expected average day 3) and at discharge ( expected average 4 weeks),
Study Arms (2)
Cervical and thoracic mobilization
EXPERIMENTALCervical and thoracic mobilization: described as a repetitive low-velocity oscillatory movement applied to a joint segment. It is graded 1-4 based on the size of the amplitude and where in range it is being applied. The mobilization technique chosen will be based on the examination and clinical reasoning process of the therapist. The cervical and thoracic mobilization will be applied to the most provocative level.
Cervical and thoracic manipulation
EXPERIMENTALCervical and thoracic manipulation: is defined as high-velocity low-amplitude thrust at end range of a particular spinal segment. The therapist performs this technique by taking up all available slack at a particular segment and applying a high-velocity thrust through the end-range restriction. The manipulation technique will be chosen based on the examination and clinical reasoning process of the therapist.
Interventions
Described in arm description
described in arm description
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- subjects aged 18-70 years old with a chief complaint of reproducible neck pain and an NDI score of 10 or greater.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Youngstown State Universitylead
- Franklin Pierce Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rehabilitex Inc.
Solon, Ohio, 44139, United States
Pain Relief and Physical Therapy
Havertown, Pennsylvania, 19083, United States
Related Publications (5)
Dunning JR, Cleland JA, Waldrop MA, Arnot CF, Young IA, Turner M, Sigurdsson G. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;42(1):5-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
PMID: 21979312RESULTCross KM, Kuenze C, Grindstaff TL, Hertel J. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation improves pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;41(9):633-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3670. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
PMID: 21885904RESULTLau HM, Wing Chiu TT, Lam TH. The effectiveness of thoracic manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain - a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2011 Apr;16(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
PMID: 20813577RESULTLeaver AM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Jull G, McAuley JH. Efficacy of manipulation for non-specific neck pain of recent onset: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Feb 26;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-18.
PMID: 17324291RESULTMiller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.02.007. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 20627797RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W. Griswold, DPT
Youngstown State University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W Griswold, DPT
Youngstown State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Kenneth Learman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2013
First Posted
January 15, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 26, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01