NCT03945240

Brief Summary

Determine the most effective and efficient treatment protocols for treating neck pain with LLLT.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 9, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of grounding days from flying due to neck pain -- Interval Variable

    Number of grounding days from flying due to neck pain -- Interval Variable

    Record during screening visit

  • Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The NDI assessing functional capacity, has 10 parts, which evaluate pain intensity, personal care, lifting objects, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. NDI scores, ranging from 0-50, may be doubled and also expressed as a percentage of function on a scale of 0-100%; thereby allowing the measure to be treated as an interval variable. It has also been categorized into 5 ordinal measurements, which are shown below with corresponding score and percentage measurements: * NDI Score 0-4 (0-8%) is total capacity (no disability) * NDI Score 5-14 (10-28%) is mild incapacity (mild disability) * NDI Score 15-24 (30-48%) is mild incapacity (moderate disability) * NDI Score 25-34 (50-64%) is serious capacity (severe disability) * NDI Score 35-50 (70-100%) is severe incapacity (complete disability)

    visit 0 (screening visit), visit 1 (day 1), visit 10 (day 10)

  • Change in Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)

    The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale is an assessment tool that utilizes a numerical rating scale, enhanced by functional word descriptors, color coding, and graphical facial expressions to evaluate a patient's self-reported pain levels. The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.

    visit 0 (screening visit), visit 1 (day 1), visit 10 (day 10)

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Change in Interleukin 2 Receptor (CD25) Soluble Biomarker Levels

    day 0 (pre-treatment), day 10 (post-treatment)

  • Change in Interleukin 12 biomarker Levels

    day 0 (pre-treatment), day 10 (post-treatment)

  • Change in Interleukin 4 Biomarker Levels

    day 0 (pre-treatment), day 10 (post-treatment)

  • Change in Interleukin 5 biomarker Levels

    day 0 (pre-treatment), day 10 (post-treatment)

  • Change in Interleukin 10 Biomarker Levels

    day 0 (pre-treatment), day 10 (post-treatment)

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group 1 (Pinnacle, lower dosimetry parameters)

EXPERIMENTAL

Utilize the Pinnacle Series Laser by Aspen Laser Systems to apply LLLT

Procedure: Group 1 -- using Pinnacle Series Laser Device

Group 2 (Pinnacle, higher dosimetry parameters)

EXPERIMENTAL

Utilize the Pinnacle Series Laser by Aspen Laser Systems to apply LLLT

Procedure: Group 2 -- using Pinnacle Series Laser Device

Group 3 (Phoenix)

EXPERIMENTAL

Utilizing the Phoenix Thera-Lase by Phoenix Thera-Lase Systems, we will apply LLT.

Procedure: Group 3 -- using Phoenix Thera-Lase Device

Interventions

Utilizing the Pinnacle Series Laser by Aspen Laser Systems, investigators will apply 635-780nm, 10 mW cw, \~ 5-105 J/cm2 at the following time and mW intervals. The beam will be applied at 12 application patterns equidistant and parallel to each other. Each application point will be treated for the timeframes referenced below: * Subgroup 1: 10 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 2: 10 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 3: 10 minutes at 32 mW * Subgroup 4: 15 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 5: 15 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 6: 15 minutes at 32 mW

Group 1 (Pinnacle, lower dosimetry parameters)

Utilizing the Pinnacle Series Laser by Aspen Laser Systems, we will apply 830nm, 30- 50mW cw, \~ 1-20 J/cm2 at the following time and mW intervals. The beam will be applied at 12 application patterns equidistant and parallel to each other. Each application point will be treated for the timeframes referenced below: * Subgroup 1: 10 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 2: 10 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 3: 10 minutes at 32 mW * Subgroup 4: 15 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 5: 15 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 6: 15 minutes at 32 mW

Group 2 (Pinnacle, higher dosimetry parameters)

Utilizing the Phoenix Thera-Lase by Phoenix Thera-Lase Systems, we will apply 904nm, 40mW (pulsed) @10000Hz, \~ 4-18 J/cm2 at the following time and mW intervals. The beam will be applied at 12 application patterns equidistant and parallel to each other. Each application point will be treated for the timeframes referenced below: * Subgroup 1: 10 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 2: 10 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 3: 10 minutes at 32 mW * Subgroup 4: 15 minutes at 5 mW * Subgroup 5: 15 minutes at 15 mW * Subgroup 6: 15 minutes at 32 mW

Group 3 (Phoenix)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 62 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Active Duty US Air Force pilots or onboard navigators, aged 18- 62 years of age
  • maintain operational flight status at enrollment or within the last 6 months
  • History of neck pain for a period of more than two months
  • Score on the Neck Disability Index ranging from 15-24
  • No physiotherapy or local injection in 3 months before starting the study

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnant
  • major surgery or trauma in the previous 3 months
  • unstable cervical spine
  • cervical radiculopathy
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • open wound over neck
  • pace-maker or defibrillator implantation
  • overt neuropathic pain or radiation pain
  • inability to express pain or quality of life.
  • history of neurological disorders
  • medical diagnosis of fibromyalgia; systemic disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89191, United States

Location

Related Publications (27)

  • Hamalainen O, Heinijoki H, Vanharanta H. Neck training and +Gz-related neck pain: a preliminary study. Mil Med. 1998 Oct;163(10):707-8.

    PMID: 9795549BACKGROUND
  • Harrison MF, Neary JP, Albert WJ, Kuruganti U, Croll JC, Chancey VC, Bumgardner BA. Measuring neuromuscular fatigue in cervical spinal musculature of military helicopter aircrew. Mil Med. 2009 Nov;174(11):1183-9. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-00-7409.

    PMID: 19960827BACKGROUND
  • Salmon DM, Harrison MF, Neary JP. Neck pain in military helicopter aircrew and the role of exercise therapy. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2011 Oct;82(10):978-87. doi: 10.3357/asem.2841.2011.

    PMID: 21961403BACKGROUND
  • (2018) International Association for the Study of Pain : Neck pain.

    BACKGROUND
  • Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.

    PMID: 18443635BACKGROUND
  • Attal N, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Fermanian J, Bouhassira D. The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: results of a French nationwide survey. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2836-2843. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

    PMID: 22019149BACKGROUND
  • Torrance N, Ferguson JA, Afolabi E, Bennett MI, Serpell MG, Dunn KM, Smith BH. Neuropathic pain in the community: more under-treated than refractory? Pain. 2013 May;154(5):690-699. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.022. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

    PMID: 23485369BACKGROUND
  • Mester E, Ludany G, Sellyei M, Szende B, Gyenes G, Tota GJ. [Studies on the inhibiting and activating effects of laser beams]. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1968;322:1022-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02453990. No abstract available. German.

    PMID: 5758676BACKGROUND
  • Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013 Mar;32(1):41-52.

    PMID: 24049929BACKGROUND
  • (2018) North American Association for Photobiomodulation Therapy.

    BACKGROUND
  • Guarini D, Gracia B, Ramirez-Lobos V, Noguera-Pantoja A, Sole-Ventura P. Laser Biophotomodulation in Patients with Neurosensory Disturbance of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Jan;36(1):3-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4312. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

    PMID: 29022844BACKGROUND
  • Chow RT, Heller GZ, Barnsley L. The effect of 300 mW, 830 nm laser on chronic neck pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):201-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.018. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

    PMID: 16806710BACKGROUND
  • Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Sanford LE, Woodruff LD. The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Aug;22(4):323-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2004.22.323.

    PMID: 15345176BACKGROUND
  • Carrasco TG, Guerisoli LD, Guerisoli DM, Mazzetto MO. Evaluation of low intensity laser therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Cranio. 2009 Oct;27(4):243-7. doi: 10.1179/crn.2009.035.

    PMID: 19891258BACKGROUND
  • Olavi A, Pekka R, Pertti K, Pekka P. Effects of the infrared laser therapy at treated and non-treated trigger points. Acupunct Electrother Res. 1989;14(1):9-14. doi: 10.3727/036012989816358560.

    PMID: 2568075BACKGROUND
  • Graham N, Gross AR, Carlesso LC, Santaguida PL, Macdermid JC, Walton D, Ho E; ICON. An ICON Overview on Physical Modalities for Neck Pain and Associated Disorders. Open Orthop J. 2013 Sep 20;7:440-60. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010440. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24155804BACKGROUND
  • Ceccherelli F, Altafini L, Lo Castro G, Avila A, Ambrosio F, Giron GP. Diode laser in cervical myofascial pain: a double-blind study versus placebo. Clin J Pain. 1989 Dec;5(4):301-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-198912000-00005.

    PMID: 2520419BACKGROUND
  • Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Kokino S. The clinical efficacy of low-power laser therapy on pain and function in cervical osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(3):181-4. doi: 10.1007/s100670170061.

    PMID: 11434469BACKGROUND
  • Konstantinovic LM, Cutovic MR, Milovanovic AN, Jovic SJ, Dragin AS, Letic MDj, Miler VM. Low-level laser therapy for acute neck pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study. Pain Med. 2010 Aug;11(8):1169-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00907.x.

    PMID: 20704667BACKGROUND
  • Gur A, Sarac AJ, Cevik R, Altindag O, Sarac S. Efficacy of 904 nm gallium arsenide low level laser therapy in the management of chronic myofascial pain in the neck: a double-blind and randomize-controlled trial. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(3):229-35. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20082.

    PMID: 15389743BACKGROUND
  • Ilbuldu E, Cakmak A, Disci R, Aydin R. Comparison of laser, dry needling, and placebo laser treatments in myofascial pain syndrome. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Aug;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1089/pho.2004.22.306.

    PMID: 15345173BACKGROUND
  • Hakguder A, Birtane M, Gurcan S, Kokino S, Turan FN. Efficacy of low level laser therapy in myofascial pain syndrome: an algometric and thermographic evaluation. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(5):339-43. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10241.

    PMID: 14677161BACKGROUND
  • Woodruff LD, Bounkeo JM, Brannon WM, Dawes KS, Barham CD, Waddell DL, Enwemeka CS. The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Jun;22(3):241-7. doi: 10.1089/1549541041438623.

    PMID: 15315732BACKGROUND
  • Huang YY, Chen AC, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response. 2009 Sep 1;7(4):358-83. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-027.Hamblin.

    PMID: 20011653BACKGROUND
  • Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy - an update. Dose Response. 2011;9(4):602-18. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.11-009.Hamblin. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

    PMID: 22461763BACKGROUND
  • Huang YY, Nagata K, Tedford CE, McCarthy T, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces oxidative stress in primary cortical neurons in vitro. J Biophotonics. 2013 Oct;6(10):829-38. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200157. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

    PMID: 23281261BACKGROUND
  • Huang YY, Nagata K, Tedford CE, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser therapy (810 nm) protects primary cortical neurons against excitotoxicity in vitro. J Biophotonics. 2014 Aug;7(8):656-64. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201300125. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

    PMID: 24127337BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Paul F Crawford, MD

    US Air Force

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2019

First Posted

May 10, 2019

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 9, 2025

Study Completion

December 9, 2025

Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We do not plan on sharing data

Locations