Validation of the Cervicothoracic Differentiation Test
EMU
Effectiveness of Matched or Unmatched Cervical and Thoracic Manipulations on Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Involving the CTDT (The EMU Manipulation Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two spinal manipulations in adults between the ages of 18-65 based on the results of a non-invasive clinical test. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does matched or unmatched region of manipulation based on the CTDT result in greater reduction of pain levels and improvement in range of motion in adults with neck pain compared to unmatched manipulations? Participants will be asked to:
- rate their pain with neck movement, complete brief questionnaires about their pain,
- have their neck range of motion measured,
- perform a test known as the cervico-thoracic differentiation test (CTDT),
- receive either a cervical or thoracic manipulation,
- repeat the range of motion measurements.
- A second session will occur 7-10 days later where questionnaires and range of motion measures will be repeated. Researchers will compare the effects of manipulation matched to CTDT test result to individuals in the unmatched CTDT manipulation group to see if the CTDT may indicate which region will provide a greater treatment effect for individuals with neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedJuly 11, 2024
July 1, 2024
4 months
February 22, 2024
July 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain with motion
pain occurring with the participants most provocative cervical motion as measured on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS)
immediate post intervention, 7-10 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
pain at rest
immediate post intervention, 7-10 days
range of motion
immediate post intervention, 7-10 days
neck disability index
7-10 days post intervention
Study Arms (2)
matched manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the matched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the participant's most provocative spinal level as determined by the examiner and side determined by the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.
unmatched manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the unmatched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine found during the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the most hypomobile spinal level determined by the physical therapist and to the most provocative side found during the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.
Interventions
High velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) manipulation of the cervical or thoracic spine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between the ages of 18 and 65,
- must report neck pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) greater than or equal to 3/10.
You may not qualify if:
- History of motor vehicle accident (MVA) within the past 6 months,
- hypertension greater than or equal to 160/100,
- non-mechanical neck pain (pain that is not reproducible with movement),
- any past or present history of cancer,
- upper motor neuron (CNS) lesion symptoms ( a positive Clonus sign, Babinski sign, or hyperreflexia of DTR's),
- any infection that originates from the spine
- Current confirmed or suspected pregnancy, or recent postpartum (6 mos),
- known osteoporosis,
- rheumatoid arthritis,
- long-term use of corticosteroids (\>6mos),
- history of neck surgery,
- history of vertebral or rib fractures,
- blood clotting disorders,
- connective tissue disorders,
- radicular/neural pain/symptoms. Radicular pain and symptoms would include dermatomal changes (sensory loss or hypersensitization), myotomal changes (weaknesses of muscular along nerve distributions), decreased reflexes (hyporeflexia), pain that travels down the upper extremities, and pain that is referred into the upper extremities.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Hartford
West Hartford, Connecticut, 06117, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Swanson, PT, DSc
University of Hartford
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded research assistants will perform all baseline and follow-up measures. Investigator providing manipulation is blinded to group allocation (matched/unmatched) Participants will not be told if the CTDT indicates that they would benefit from cervical or thoracic manipulation, and the investigator performing the CTDT will only indicate which region is to be manipulated. All investigators are blinded to the work of the others and submit their results to an additional research assistant who will enter the data in a spreadsheet not accessible to the remainder of the research team until the conclusion of the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator, associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2024
First Posted
March 1, 2024
Study Start
February 20, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
July 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share