NCT06287242

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two spinal manipulations in adults between the ages of 18-65 based on the results of a non-invasive clinical test. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does matched or unmatched region of manipulation based on the CTDT result in greater reduction of pain levels and improvement in range of motion in adults with neck pain compared to unmatched manipulations? Participants will be asked to:

  • rate their pain with neck movement, complete brief questionnaires about their pain,
  • have their neck range of motion measured,
  • perform a test known as the cervico-thoracic differentiation test (CTDT),
  • receive either a cervical or thoracic manipulation,
  • repeat the range of motion measurements.
  • A second session will occur 7-10 days later where questionnaires and range of motion measures will be repeated. Researchers will compare the effects of manipulation matched to CTDT test result to individuals in the unmatched CTDT manipulation group to see if the CTDT may indicate which region will provide a greater treatment effect for individuals with neck pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 9, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

neck pain, manipulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pain with motion

    pain occurring with the participants most provocative cervical motion as measured on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS)

    immediate post intervention, 7-10 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • pain at rest

    immediate post intervention, 7-10 days

  • range of motion

    immediate post intervention, 7-10 days

  • neck disability index

    7-10 days post intervention

Study Arms (2)

matched manipulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the matched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the participant's most provocative spinal level as determined by the examiner and side determined by the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.

Other: spinal manipulation

unmatched manipulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the unmatched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine found during the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the most hypomobile spinal level determined by the physical therapist and to the most provocative side found during the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.

Other: spinal manipulation

Interventions

High velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) manipulation of the cervical or thoracic spine

matched manipulationunmatched manipulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • must report neck pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) greater than or equal to 3/10.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of motor vehicle accident (MVA) within the past 6 months,
  • hypertension greater than or equal to 160/100,
  • non-mechanical neck pain (pain that is not reproducible with movement),
  • any past or present history of cancer,
  • upper motor neuron (CNS) lesion symptoms ( a positive Clonus sign, Babinski sign, or hyperreflexia of DTR's),
  • any infection that originates from the spine
  • Current confirmed or suspected pregnancy, or recent postpartum (6 mos),
  • known osteoporosis,
  • rheumatoid arthritis,
  • long-term use of corticosteroids (\>6mos),
  • history of neck surgery,
  • history of vertebral or rib fractures,
  • blood clotting disorders,
  • connective tissue disorders,
  • radicular/neural pain/symptoms. Radicular pain and symptoms would include dermatomal changes (sensory loss or hypersensitization), myotomal changes (weaknesses of muscular along nerve distributions), decreased reflexes (hyporeflexia), pain that travels down the upper extremities, and pain that is referred into the upper extremities.
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Hartford

West Hartford, Connecticut, 06117, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Interventions

Manipulation, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Brian Swanson, PT, DSc

    University of Hartford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinded research assistants will perform all baseline and follow-up measures. Investigator providing manipulation is blinded to group allocation (matched/unmatched) Participants will not be told if the CTDT indicates that they would benefit from cervical or thoracic manipulation, and the investigator performing the CTDT will only indicate which region is to be manipulated. All investigators are blinded to the work of the others and submit their results to an additional research assistant who will enter the data in a spreadsheet not accessible to the remainder of the research team until the conclusion of the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle investigator, associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2024

First Posted

March 1, 2024

Study Start

February 20, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2024

Study Completion

June 30, 2024

Last Updated

July 11, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations