Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Pediatric Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Concurrent Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is the most common cause of childhood physical disability. Early CP diagnosis and intervention are crucial to improving outcomes in these patients. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has become a standard therapeutic intervention for children with unilateral CP. CIMT utilizes restraining of the unaffected upper limb to stimulate the use of the paretic upper limb enhancing neuroplasticity in the affected cerebral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe non-invasive technique that stimulates the brain using repetitive magnetic pulses to enhance neuroplasticity. TMS has been shown to improve symptoms of children with neurodevelopmental disorders such as CP. It is predicted that a combined therapy that uses CIMT and TMS is could improve mobility in children with unilateral CP. To determine if combined therapy is beneficial to children with CP and if use of this therapy is feasible for families, the investigators would like to conducted a feasibility trial. In this trial the investigators will enrol 10 children who have unilateral CP, the participants will either receive:
- 1.CIMT and TMS or;
- 2.CIMT and fake TMS, fake TMS consist of a child sitting near the TMS machine but not receiving any TMS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedJune 9, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.5 years
April 22, 2021
June 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Evaluation of Participant recruitment
Participant recruitment: We will assess number of eligible children, reasons for ineligibility and non-participation.
5 Months
Evaluation of Participant retention during trial
We will assess and report the number of missing variables and number of patients with incomplete outcome measures.
5 Months
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by Parental Reports
We will ask parents to report weekly on the presence of previously reported side effects including headaches, anxiety, dizziness, tingling, mood changes, difficulties with concentration, abnormal muscle contractions, nausea, stomach ache, fatigue and decreased hand function of either hand. For completeness we will also ask about presence of seizures (new onset or increase in existing seizures), although this side effect was not seen in previous safety studies. We will also assess number of times (and reasons) TMS session ended before the stipulated time and number of minutes lost.
5 Months
Effectiveness of the transcrainial magnetic stimulation blinding process on patients and therapist
TMS sham process and blinding of patients and therapist: At the end of the study we will ask parents/ occupational therapist assessing outcomes to report on possible group allocation of participant (could they identify if the participant received TMS or sham TMS?)
5 months
Evaluation of treatment intervention by parental guardians
Acceptability of treatment: Based on Gillick's work, at the end of the intervention (6 weeks) and 3 months post completion, we will ask parents to rate on a scale of 1 to 10 their "satisfaction with the intervention, willingness to repeat the study, and likelihood of recommending the study to others." . \- Participant research engagement: At the end of the study we will ask parents to rate their willingness to participate as a research-collaborator in a future large RCT study.
3 months
Estimation of intervention costs
This study will provide information needed to develop a budget for the future application.
5 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of mobility using Small Kids-AHA
5 months
Assessment of mobility using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
5 months
Study Arms (2)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation with constraint induced movement therapy
EXPERIMENTALCIMT/TMS: Five participants will receive a one-hour weekly occupational therapy session of CIMT with 2-hours of daily home program for a total of 6 weeks; immediately prior to initiation of each CIMT session, participants will receive 20 minutes of TMS 1HZ.
constraint induced movement therapy Sham transcrianial magnetic stimulation
SHAM COMPARATOR(CIMT/sham TMS): Five participants will receive a one-hour weekly session of CIMT with 2-hours daily of home program for a total of 6 weeks; immediately prior to initiation of each CIMT session, participants will receive 20 minutes of sham TMS 1HZ.
Interventions
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe non-invasive technique that stimulates the brain using repetitive magnetic pulses to enhance neuroplasticity. TMS has been shown to produce lasting modulation of cortical activity and improve clinical symptoms of children with neurodevelopmental disorders including CP
Sham Transcranial Magnetic stimulation will be given to the control group. During the Sham procedure patients will sit near the TMS but will not receive any magnetic pulses.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of unilateral spastic CP
- assessed as Gross Motor Function Classification System level I to III
- assessed as Manual Ability Classification System level II to level IV
You may not qualify if:
- have received CIMT in the last 6 month
- do not have neuroimaging studies to confirm clinical diagnosis of CP
- severe impairments limiting their ability to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SSCY/RCC
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E3G1, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14.
PMID: 17370477BACKGROUNDNovak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, de Vries LS, Einspieler C, Fahey M, Fehlings D, Ferriero DM, Fetters L, Fiori S, Forssberg H, Gordon AM, Greaves S, Guzzetta A, Hadders-Algra M, Harbourne R, Kakooza-Mwesige A, Karlsson P, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Latal B, Loughran-Fowlds A, Maitre N, McIntyre S, Noritz G, Pennington L, Romeo DM, Shepherd R, Spittle AJ, Thornton M, Valentine J, Walker K, White R, Badawi N. Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689.
PMID: 28715518BACKGROUNDGordon AM. To constrain or not to constrain, and other stories of intensive upper extremity training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Sep;53 Suppl 4:56-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04066.x.
PMID: 21950396BACKGROUNDUswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a method for harnessing neuroplasticity to treat motor disorders. Prog Brain Res. 2013;207:379-401. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00015-1.
PMID: 24309263BACKGROUNDChen YP, Pope S, Tyler D, Warren GL. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Oct;28(10):939-53. doi: 10.1177/0269215514544982. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
PMID: 25125440BACKGROUNDSakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd RN. Efficacy of upper limb therapies for unilateral cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e175-204. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0675. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
PMID: 24366991BACKGROUNDEliasson AC, Holmefur M. The influence of early modified constraint-induced movement therapy training on the longitudinal development of hand function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jan;57(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12589. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
PMID: 25236758BACKGROUNDMasuda F, Nakajima S, Miyazaki T, Tarumi R, Ogyu K, Wada M, Tsugawa S, Croarkin PE, Mimura M, Noda Y. Clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review. Autism. 2019 Oct;23(7):1614-1629. doi: 10.1177/1362361318822502. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
PMID: 30663323BACKGROUNDKirton A, Andersen J, Herrero M, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carsolio L, Damji O, Keess J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill MD. Brain stimulation and constraint for perinatal stroke hemiparesis: The PLASTIC CHAMPS Trial. Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1659-67. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002646. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PMID: 27029628BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator, Developmental Pediatrician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2021
First Posted
May 26, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06