Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the effects of bone-anchored and tooth borne maxillary protraction on dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2021
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
11 months
April 21, 2021
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pre-treatment (T0) cephalometric analysis measures
A cephalometric analysis of skeletal maxillary (SNA) and mandibular (SNB) positions
0 month
Pre-treatment (T0) soft tissues measurements
Maxillary and mandibular (Soft tissue convexity angle) soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry
0 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post-treatment (T1) cephalometric analysis measurements
An average of 6 month
Post-treatment (T1) soft tissues measurements
An average of 6 month
Study Arms (3)
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction group
EXPERIMENTALFace mask with hybrid-hyrax
Tooth-borne maxillary protraction group
EXPERIMENTALFace mask with conventional bonded RME
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group consisting of 14 non-treated Class III malocclusion subjects
Interventions
Face mask with hybrid-hyrax
Face mask with conventional bonded RME
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Late mixed or early permanent dentition
- C3 or C4 period according to the cervical vertebral maturation method
- Presence of skeletal class III malocclusion (ANB \<0 °).
- Retrusive nasomaxillary complex (Nperp-A \<1 mm).
- Presence of dental class III malocclusion
- Normal or horizontal growth pattern (SNGoGn \<40 °).
- Negative overjet (overjet \<0)
- Good cooperation
- Absence of any systemic disease
- Periodontal health
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- No craniofacial deformity
- No neuromuscular deformity
- The absence of a congenital anomaly
You may not qualify if:
- Poor cooperation
- Early mixed dentition
- Individuals who have passed the C4 period
- Craniofacial deformity
- Congenital anomaly
- A history of facial trauma Syndromes such as cleft lip and palate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Izmir Katip Celebi University,Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Izmir, Çiğli, 35640, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Burcin AKAN, Phd
Academician
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- 3 arm parallel clinical trial
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2021
First Posted
April 28, 2021
Study Start
June 15, 2020
Primary Completion
May 20, 2021
Study Completion
October 20, 2021
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04