Treating Growing Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction
Radiographic Analysis of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes Following the Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction in Growing Patients Using Two Different Treatment Protocols: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial intends to test the efficacy of two treatment protocols in the correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary constriction. We have to options, either to modify the growth using inter-maxillary traction based on an upper fixed appliance that is used in the same time for rapid maxillary expansion or to inhibit mandibular growth by a removable mandibular retractor (RMR) supplied with an expansion screw.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.3 years
December 31, 2024
March 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (26)
Change in the SNA angle
This angle represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the SNB angle
his angle represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the ANB angle
This angle represents the relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the SN-GoMe angle
This angle represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the MM angle
This angle represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the SN-SPP angle
This angle represents the position of the upper jaw (represented by the spinal plane "SPP") in the vertical direction of the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the Witz appraisal
Witz appraisal is measured by the anteroposterior distance between the projections of Points A and B onto the functional occlusal plane, measured in mm. It gives an idea about the sagittal relationship between the upper and lower jaws.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the Co.Go.Me angle
This angle is created by the intersection between the ramus plane (Co.Go) and the mandibular plane (Go.Me). This is called the gonial angle.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the mandibular length
This distance is measured between the mandibular condyle (Co) and the genial point (Gn).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the ramus height
This distance is measured between the mandibular condyle (Co) and mandibular gonial angle (Go).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the lower facial height
This distance is measured between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and the lower point on the mandibular symphysis (Me).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the A-H variable
This variable is the horizontal distance between A point (the maxillary bone point) and the perpendicular plane to the S-N plane through Point S (Sella).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the B-H variable
This variable is the horizontal distance between B point (the mandibular bone point) and the perpendicular plane to the S-N plane through Point S (Sella).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the SN-U1
This angle represents the relationship of the upper anterior teeth with SN in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the GoMe-L1 angle
This angle represents the relationship of the lower anterior teeth with the mandibular plane in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the SPP-U1 angle
This angle represents the relationship of the upper anterior teeth with the SPP plane in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in ls-E Line distance
It is the distance between Ricketts's esthetic line and the upper lip point.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in li-E Line distance
It is the distance between the lower lip point and esthetic line of Ricketts.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the Gla-Sn-Pog angle
It is the angle between the soft tissue forehead point (Gla) and the subnasal point (Sn) and the most anterior point on the soft tissue chin (Pog).
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the naso-labial angle
It is the angle between the upper lip and nasal columella plane.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the labio-mental angle
It is the angle between the lower lip and the chin. It is also called the labio-mental fold angle..
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the Ag to MZF-j variable
Maxillomandibular width right: measured from the Jugal process to the frontofacial plane. This measurement is measured on the frontal cephalogram.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the J-J distance
It is the maxillary width measured on the frontal cephalogram.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the molar width at the level of apices (M-MRA)
This is measured between the apices of the palatal roots of the maxillary first molars (R.RA-L.RA) on the frontal cephalogram.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the molar width at the level of cusps (M-MCT)
This is measured between the mesio-palatal cusps tips of the maxillary first molars (R.CT-L.CT) on the frontal cephalogram.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Change in the inferred molar tipping (M-tip)
The difference between R.RA-L.RA and R.CT-L.CT variables mentioned above and the difference is given in mm.
At two assessment times: (1) one day before the beginning of the treatment, and (2) at the end of the retention phase which is expected to occur within 12 months
Study Arms (2)
RMR with SME
EXPERIMENTALThe removable mandibular retractor (RMR) will inhibit mandibular growth. This appliance will be supplemented with a medline screw that is used for slow maxillary expansion (SME).
BAIMT with RME
ACTIVE COMPARATORBone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT) will be used for Class III correction. This upper part of the appliance is used for rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
Interventions
Patients will be asked to wear this removable appliance for 16 hours daily. The expansion screw is activated twice a week.
The elastics are worn 18 hours per day to achieve the sagittal correction. The RME appliance on the upper jaw is activated twice daily until the required expansion is achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- growing male and female patients aged between 12 and 15 years
- Angle's class III malocclusion
- skeletal class III relationship judged clinically and confirmed radiographically (-4 \< ANB \< + 1)
- An anterior crossbite involving two or more teeth or an edge-to-edge incisor relationship with or without an anterior shift of the lower jaw upon closure
- normal inclination of the lower incisors or slightly proclined (i.e., the IMPA between 85° and 100°
- maxillary constriction requiring expansion judged clinically and confirmed radiographically
- permanent dentition
- no previous orthodontic treatment
You may not qualify if:
- skeletal class III malocclusion caused predominantly by maxillary deficiency (SNA\<78° with a normal SNB angle)
- severe skeletal class III presenting mainly due to mandibular protrusion (ANB \< - 4° with no functional shift on closure)
- contraindications for the use of the mini-screws, such as osteoporosis (addressed with cortisone and its derivatives) or those undergoing radiation treatment
- a convergence between the mandibular canine root and the first premolar root ,which was assessed radiographically
- facial asymmetry, characterized by a mandibular midline deviation exceeding 2 mm from the facial midline
- MM angle \>35° or SN-MP angle \> 40°
- The existence of cleft lip or craniofacial syndromes and/or palate abnormalities and
- The existence of supernumerary teeth or missing ones except for the third molars.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Damascus Universitylead
- Universiti Sains Malaysiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Adib Al-Lahham Center, Damascus Health Directorate, Ministry of Health
Damascus, DJ223QX, Syria
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damsacus
Damascus, DM20 HAJ72, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Majanni AM, Hajeer MY. The Removable Mandibular Retractor vs the Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction in the Correction of skeletal class III Malocclusion in children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):361-71. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1856.
PMID: 27443361BACKGROUNDSaleh M, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Assessment of pain and discomfort during early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Removable Mandibular Retractor Appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):119-24.
PMID: 23758461BACKGROUNDSaleh M, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Short-term soft- and hard-tissue changes following Class III treatment using a removable mandibular retractor: a randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 May;16(2):75-86. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12007. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PMID: 23323964BACKGROUNDRabah N, Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA. Evaluation of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion in early adolescent patients with skeletal maxillary constriction using cone-beam computed tomography: A short-term follow-up randomized controlled trial. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):583-591. doi: 10.17219/dmp/133513.
PMID: 36108265BACKGROUNDRabah N, Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Mahmoud G. Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes When Treating Maxillary Constriction Using a Slow Removable Versus a Rapid Fixed Expansion Appliance in the Adolescence Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2022 Mar 3;14(3):e22793. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22793. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PMID: 35261839BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Younis Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2024
First Posted
January 7, 2025
Study Start
September 15, 2021
Primary Completion
January 15, 2023
Study Completion
September 15, 2023
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share