Class III Malocclusion
26
1
1
17
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 26 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 17 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 17 completed trials
Clinical Trials (26)
Comparison of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Tooth-Borne Face Mask Therapy Following the Alt-RAMEC Protocol
Assesment of Ethnic Bias in an Artificial Intelligence Based Orthodontic Diagnosis System
Effect of Face Mask Therapy on Blood Oxygen Levels
Evaluation of Pain and Functional Impairments When Treating Class III Malocclusion Using Two Treatment Procedures
Treating Growing Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction
Mandibular Sequential Distalization Versus Class III Elastics With Clear Aligners in Class III Patients
Corticotomy-Assisted Class III Elastic Applications
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
Effects of Class III Elastics on Stability of Orthopaedic Class III Correction
Palatal Versus Buccal Protraction Using Plates Assisted With Facemask in Growing Class III Patients
Mandibular First Molar Distalization
Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach
Patient Specific Intraoral Inverted-L Osteotomy Modified With Inferior Alveolar Nerve Relocation in Corrective Mandibular Surgery
The Effects of the Chin Cup on Temporomandibular Joint and Mandibular Dimensions
Success Rate of the Miniscrews in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf
The Effect of Splint Usage in Laterognathic Cl III Orthognathic Surgery Patients
The Effect of Orthopedic Face Mask Use on Head Posture and Pharyngeal Airway
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency